Volume 3 Issue 5
Oct.  2007
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Abstract
References
Related Articles
HU Derong, LIN Qin, KE Changliang. Preliminary study on the relationship of sulfate-reducing bacteria and other environmental factors in the sediment of marine culture cage area[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2007, 3(5): 14-18.
Citation: HU Derong, LIN Qin, KE Changliang. Preliminary study on the relationship of sulfate-reducing bacteria and other environmental factors in the sediment of marine culture cage area[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2007, 3(5): 14-18.
shu

Preliminary study on the relationship of sulfate-reducing bacteria and other environmental factors in the sediment of marine culture cage area

  • 1.

    Key Laboratory of Marine Fishery Ecology Environment and Pollution Monitoring & Control Techniques, South China Sea Fisheries Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, Guangzhou 510300, China

  • 2.

    Shanghai Fishery University, Shanghai 200090, China

  • 3.

    Guangdong Ocean University, Zhanjiang 524088, China

More Information
  • Received Date: April 23, 2007
  • Revised Date: June 21, 2007
    Graphical Abstract
    • Abstract

  • The content of sulfate-reducing bacteria in the sediment of Dapeng′ao Cove marine culture cage area was determined by using the most probable number (MPN) technique. The results showed that the percentage detection of five sampling stations is 100%, the content of SRB in fish cage area was higher than that in control area and seashell area. The vertical content distribution of SRB is 1cm layer>5 cm layer>10 cm layer. The relationships among SRB content, sulfide, Eh, pH were discussed. The content of SRB is positively correlated with sulfide(R=0.96, P < 0.05), and significantly negative correlated with Eh (R=－0.97, P < 0.01).There is no significant relationship between the content of SRB and pH.

    • FullText(HTML)
    • References (13)
  • [1]
    谈媛, 易绍金. 硫酸盐还原菌对不同钢材的腐蚀及缓蚀作用[J]. 油气田环境保护, 2006, 16(4): 44-45. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-3158.2006.01.015
    [2]
    ALENA L, MMARIA K. Bioremediation of acid mine drainage contaminated by SRB[J]. Hydrometallurgy, 2005, 77(1/2): 97-102. doi: 10.1016/j.hydromet.2004.10.019
    [3]
    陈皓文. 海洋硫酸盐还原菌及其活动的经济重要性[J]. 黄渤海海洋, 1998, 16(4): 64-74. https://kns.cnki.net/kcms2/article/abstract?v=-xbefZa1CduJZWFwDE2YvZkXwYDSt02Rd42WcqgQcCEaKwq6EuDeyyQjfQ4Xux7zwC0xUjFey1NEHpg8qS11LxV9JTRo0o9qify7-xkBgEUHk86I0K_mFDernzFI4Z1TOu-HRzoUaXTNusV9u1E92CVYVrm43AMSJ2di3X73-9sq5vUr0lwL883GhXS7jdKr&uniplatform=NZKPT&language=CHS
    [4]
    乔士斌, 林钦. 大鹏澳网箱养殖区沉积物耗氧的初步研究[J]. 南方水产, 2006, 2(3): 32-39. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-0780.2006.03.005
    [5]
    黄洪辉, 林钦, 王文质, 等. 大鹏澳海水鱼类网箱养殖对水环境的影响[J]. 南方水产, 2005, 1(3): 7-13. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-0780.2005.03.002
    [6]
    严莉, 王佳. 硫酸盐还原菌对海水状态和碳钢腐蚀行为的影响[J]. 海洋科学, 2004, 28(9): 70-74. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3096.2004.09.015
    [7]
    国家技术监督局. GB/T14643.5-1993工业循环冷却水中硫酸盐还原菌的测定, MPN法[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 1993. https://std.samr.gov.cn/gb/search/gbDetailed?id=71F772D78C81D3A7E05397BE0A0AB82A
    [8]
    国家海洋局. GB17378.5-1998海洋监测规范[S]. 北京: 海洋出版社, 1998.
    [9]
    薛廷耀. 海洋细菌学[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1962: 73-77. https://baike.baidu.com/item/%E6%B5%B7%E6%B4%8B%E7%B4%B0%E8%8F%8C%E5%AD%B8/5267310
    [10]
    高爱国, 陈皓文, 孙海青. 北极沉积物中硫酸盐还原菌与生物地球化学要素的相关分析[J]. 环境科学学报, 2003, 239(5): 619-624. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0253-2468.2003.05.011
    [11]
    雷衍之. 养殖水环境化学[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2004: 142-149.
    [12]
    陈皓文, 李培英, 王波. 浙江-闽北陆架沉积物硫酸盐还原菌及与生物地球化学因子关系的分析[J]. 环境科学学报, 2000, 20(4): 478-482. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0253-2468.2000.04.019
    [13]
    陈皓文, 徐家声. 北部湾东侧沉积物硫酸盐还原菌含量及其意义[J]. 广西科学院学报, 1999, 15(3): 103-107. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-7378.1999.03.002
    • Related Articles

  • Related Articles

    [1]YIN Xingjun, HUA Chuanxiang, ZHU Qingcheng. Analysis of morphological differences and discrimination between female and male Cololabis saira based on geometric morphometrics[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2024, 20(6): 104-111. DOI: 10.12131/20240077
    [2]ZHANG Yuqing, GUO Huayang, ZHANG Nan, LIU Baosuo, ZHU Kecheng, XIAN Lin, ZHU Tengfei, ZHANG Dianchang. Path analysis of partial growth-related traits for wild large yellow croaker (Larimichthys crocea) of different geographical populations[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2024, 20(3): 112-119. DOI: 10.12131/20230203
    [3]XIA Feiyu, ZHANG Xiumei, XU Pian, XU Ying, WANG Yihang. Comparative analysis of shell frame characteristics and mitochondrial 16S rRNA gene between wild and cultured mussels (Mytilus coruscus)[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2023, 19(5): 168-176. DOI: 10.12131/20230096
    [4]GAO Jin, WANG Yongbo, LIU Jinye, GUO Yilan, FU Shuyuan. Transcriptome analysis of Plectropomus leopardus liver under different flow velocity[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2022, 18(1): 107-117. DOI: 10.12131/20210125
    [5]Jiangtao LI, Kaiyu YANG, Xiaotong QIU, Junchao FANG, Feifei HUANG, Xiaolong QIU, Xiaojing LYU, Rishen LIANG, Qingqing LI, Li LIN. Comparison of growth and morphological characteristics of inbred and hybrid families of Micropterus salmoides from Foshan and Taiwan populations[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2021, 17(5): 1-9. DOI: 10.12131/20200262
    [6]WEI Lei, ZHU Shuqin, LIU Wei, ZHAO Jinliang, QIAN Yezhou, WU Chao, QIAN De. Comparison on morphology and body spots characteristics between backcross progenies and their parents of mandarin fish[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2020, 16(2): 1-7. DOI: 10.12131/20190219
    [7]GONG Fahui, ZHANG Dianchang, LIU Tiantian, ZHANG Nan, GUO Huayang, ZHOU Falin, HAUNG Jianhua, JIANG Shigui. Morphological comparative research of Metupenaeus ensis stocks in southeast coast of China[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2016, 12(6): 76-82. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-0780.2016.06.010
    [8]WANG Xu, XU Heng, ZOU Li, DU Xiao, WANG Fengli, ZHENG Wei, HAN Zhiqiang, SHUI Bonian. Morphological variation analysis of three differente geographic populations of Monodonta labio[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2013, 9(4): 22-27. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-0780.2013.04.004
    [9]HAN Zhen, XIAO Yongshuang, GAO Tianxiang. Comparison of morphological characteristics of 9 Larimichthys polyactis populations in China[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2012, 8(3): 25-33. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-0780.2012.03.004
    [10]ZHANG Wei, LI Chunhou, JIA Xiaoping, CHEN Peimao, FANG Liang. Multivariate analysis of organisms communities attached on concrete and iron reefs[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2009, 5(3): 30-35. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-2227.2009.03.005

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(12)

    1. 张方琪，陈嘉娴，候勇康，王丽君，廖韬梁，栗志民. 北部湾海域不同地理群体西施舌表型性状的相关性与通径分析. 中国渔业质量与标准. 2024(05): 17-25 .
    2. 王雨吉，孟学平，易乐飞. 基于转录组西施舌微卫星标记开发及隐种鉴定. 水产科学. 2022(02): 289-295 .
    3. 陈健，郭丹，翟子钦，喻达辉，白丽蓉. 西施舌形态性状与体质量性状的相关性分析. 南方水产科学. 2021(01): 45-51 . 本站查看
    4. 林建杰. 福建长乐西施舌资源现状及保护成效研究. 应用海洋学学报. 2020(04): 551-558 .
    5. 陈薛伟杰，郭健康，杨志，曹恒源，安苗. 贵州境内3个野生大眼鳜群体的形态差异. 中国水产科学. 2018(01): 34-43 .
    6. 朱明，申欣，朱笑琳，屠海淼，杨婕，孟学平. 西施舌3个群体H2A基因和nad6-nad1片段序列比较研究. 海洋科学. 2015(09): 26-32 .
    7. 孟学平，申欣，屠海淼，朱笑琳，赵娜娜，程汉良，阎斌论. 基于nad5的西施舌漳州群体遗传分化水平分析——以蛤蜊属2个物种差异水平为参照. 生态学报. 2015(08): 2635-2642 .
    8. 杨璐，陈明茹，杨圣云，胡文佳，程建新，叶观琼，纪雅宁，鲍姗姗. 水产种质资源保护区适应性管理研究. 海洋环境科学. 2014(01): 122-129 .
    9. 赵娜娜，孟学平，申欣，程汉良，于清，刘兆普. 两株西施舌内脏团细菌的分离及初步鉴定. 水产科学. 2013(02): 93-97 .
    10. 王旭，徐衡，邹莉，杜肖，王凤丽，郑伟，韩志强，水柏年. 3个单齿螺地理群体形态差异分析. 南方水产科学. 2013(04): 22-27 . 本站查看
    11. 孟学平，申欣，赵娜娜，田美，梁猛，郝珏，程汉良，阎斌伦，董志国. 漳州西施舌线粒体基因组全序列:腔蛤蜊属(Coelomactra)存在新种的证据. 海洋学报(中文版). 2013(03): 204-214 .
    12. 孟学平，申欣，赵娜娜，田美，曾云，陈建安，董志国，程汉良，阎斌伦. 基于ITS2和16S rRNA的西施舌群体遗传差异分析. 生态学报. 2013(24): 7882-7891 .

    Other cited types(4)

Catalog

    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML
    Article views (5070) PDF downloads (3030) Cited by(16)
    Related

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co., Ltd.  

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return