PAN Liling, HUANG Guiju, CHENG Shuying, WANG Xiaoning, YU Dahui. cDNA cloning, characterization and challenge-based expression profiles of cathepsin D in winged pearl oyster Pteria penguin[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2012, 8(2): 22-29. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-0780.2012.02.004
Citation: PAN Liling, HUANG Guiju, CHENG Shuying, WANG Xiaoning, YU Dahui. cDNA cloning, characterization and challenge-based expression profiles of cathepsin D in winged pearl oyster Pteria penguin[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2012, 8(2): 22-29. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-0780.2012.02.004

cDNA cloning, characterization and challenge-based expression profiles of cathepsin D in winged pearl oyster Pteria penguin

More Information
  • Received Date: July 16, 2011
  • Revised Date: November 28, 2011
  • We cloned the cathepsin D gene of winged pearl oyster(Pteria penguin)and conducted preliminary studies on its expression profiles. The cDNA sequence of cathepisn D was obtained from P.penguin (named as pgCTSD) by using homology cloning method and RACE approach. The full length of the cDNA is 1 767 bp long, with a 5′UTR of 38 bp, an ORF of 1 176 bp, encoding 392 amino acids and a 3′UTR of 553 bp. The predicted amino acid sequenceis consisted of a signal peptide of 18 aa, a pro-sequence of 29 aa and a mature protein of 345 aa, with an estimated isoelectric point of 8.04 and molecular mass of 42.3 kDa. The amino acid sequence of its pgCTSDis highly similar with that of Pinctada maxima (79% similarity), and shares 59%~75% similarity with other organisms.The fluorescent quantitative analysis suggests that pgCTSD mRNA expresses in all the tissues tested including adductor muscle, gonad, hepatopancreas, mantle and gill, with higher expression level in hepatopancreas and lower level in adductor muscle. Compared with the control, the expression level ofpgCTSD in the LPS-challenged test groups decreases in tissues of gonad and hepatopancreas significantly but increases in adductor muscle in 6 h after injection of LPS, yet no obvious change was observed in mantle or gill tissues. In 6 h after injection of Vibrio harveyi, the expression profile ofpgCTSD decreases in hepatopancreas and mantle but increases in adductor muscle and gill, yet no significant change is found in gonad. The cDNA expression′s response to challenges of LPS and Vibrio bacteria in hepatopancrea suggests pgCTSD′s participation in immune reaction.

  • [1]
    BANKOWSKA A, GACKO M, CHYCZEWSK E, et al. Biological and diagnostic role of cathepsin D[J]. Rocz Akad Med Bialymst, 1997, 42(1): 79-85. https://xueshu.baidu.com/usercenter/paper/show?paperid=8f9581b3cfd368803a7a947d0977341a&site=xueshu_se&hitarticle=1
    [2]
    CHO J H, PARK I Y, KIM H S, et al. Cathepsin D produces antimicrobial peptide parasin Ⅰ from histone H2A in the skin mucosa of fish[J]. FASEB J, 2002, 16(3): 429-431. doi: 10.1096/fj.01-0736fje
    [3]
    DIMENT S, MARTIN K J, STAHL P D. Cleavage of parathyroid hormone in macrophage endosomes illustrates a novel pathway for intracellular processing of proteins[J]. J Biol Chem, 1989, 264(23): 13403-13406. doi: 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)80010-2
    [4]
    Van NOORT J M, Van der DRIFT A C. The selectivity of cathepsin D suggests an involvement of the enzyme in the generation of T-cell epitopes[J]. J Biol Chem, 1989, 264(24): 14159-14164. doi: 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)71656-6
    [5]
    MOMMSEN T P. Salmon spawning migration and muscle protein metabolism: the August Krogh principle at work[J]. Comp Biochem Phys B, 2004, 139(3): 383-400. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpc.2004.09.018
    [6]
    LI Chenghua, ZHANG Huan, LI Ling, et al. Identification of a cathepsin D potentially involved in H2A cleavage from scallop Chlamys farreri[J]. Mol Biol Rep, 2010, 37(3): 1451-1460. doi: 10.1007/s11033-009-9534-2
    [7]
    潘俐玲, 黄桂菊, 喻达辉, 等. 大珠母贝组织蛋白酶D的cDNA克隆、序列特征分析及应激表达研究[J]. 广东农业科学, 2011, 38(10): 4-9. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-874X.2011.10.002

    PAN Liling, HUANG Guiju, YU Dahui, et al. Molecular cloning and characterization of cathepsin D in pearl oyster Pinctada maxima and its tissue expression profiles under Vibrio harveyi challenge[J]. Guangdong Agric Sci, 2011, 38(10): 4-9. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-874X.2011.10.002
    [8]
    MA Jianjun, ZHANG Dianchang, JIANG Jingjing, et al. Molecular characterization and expression analysis of cathepsin L1 cysteine protease from pearl oyster Pinctada fucata[J]. Fish Shellfish Immunol, 2010, 29(3): 501-507. doi: 10.1016/j.fsi.2010.05.006
    [9]
    麻建军, 张殿昌, 崔淑歌, 等. 合浦珠母贝组织蛋白酶L2基因的特征与组织表达分析[J]. 中国水产科学, 2010, 17(4): 701-711.

    MA Jianjun, ZHANG Dianchang, CUI Shuge, et al. Molecular characterization and expression analyasis of cathepsin L2 cysteine protease from pearl oyster Pinctada fucata[J]. J Fish Sci China, 2010, 17(4): 701-711. (in Chinese)
    [10]
    黄桂菊, 喻达辉, 曲妮妮, 等. 企鹅珍珠贝热休克蛋白70基因的克隆与序列比较分析[J]. 热带海洋学报, 2008, 27 (1): 51-56. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-5470.2008.01.009

    HUANG Guiju, YU Dahui, QU Nini, et al. Cloning and sequence comparison of heat hot protein 70 gene from penguin pearl oyster Pteria penguin[J]. J Tropic Oceanogr, 2008, 27(1): 51-56. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-5470.2008.01.009
    [11]
    ZHANG Dianchang, JIANG Shigui, QIU Lihua, et al. Molecular characterization and expression analysis of the IkB gene from pearl oyster Pinctada fucata[J]. Fish Shellfish Immunol, 2009, 26(1): 84-90. doi: 10.1016/j.fsi.2008.10.009
    [12]
    PADILHA M H, PIMENTEL A C, RIBEIRO A F, et al. Sequence and function of lysosomal and digestive cathepsin D-like proteinases of Musca domestica midgut[J]. Insect Biochem Mol Biol, 2009, 39(11): 782-791. doi: 10.1016/j.ibmb.2009.09.003
    [13]
    ROJO L, MUHLIA-ALMAZAN A, SABOROWSKI R, et al. Aspartic cathepsin D endopeptidase contributes to extracellular digestion in clawed lobsters Homarus americanus and Homarus gammarus[J]. Mar Biotechnol (NY), 2010, 12(6): 696-707. doi: 10.1007/s10126-010-9257-3
    [14]
    CARNEVALI O, CENTONZE F, BROOKS S, et al. Molecular cloning and expression of ovarian cathepsin D in seabream, Sparus auratal[J]. Biol Reprod, 1999, 61(3): 785-791. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod61.3.785
    [15]
    FAUST P L, KORNFELD S, CHIRGWIN J M. Cloning and sequence analysis of cDNA for human cathepsin D[J]. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 1985, 82(15): 4910-4914. doi: 10.1073/pnas.82.15.4910
    [16]
    梅盈洁, 李加琪, 陈瑶生, 等. 猪CTSD全长cDNA的克隆和表达分析[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2007, 38(5): 432-436. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0366-6964.2007.05.003

    MEI Yingjie, LI Jiaqi, CHEN Yaosheng, et al. Cloning and expression of porcine cathepsin D gene full-length cDNA[J]. Acta Veterinaria et Zootechnica Sinaca, 2007, 38(5): 432-436. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0366-6964.2007.05.003
    [17]
    BROOKS S, TYLER C R, CARNEVALI O, et al. Molecular characterisation of ovarian cathepsin D in the rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss[J]. Gene, 1997, 201(1/2): 45-54. doi: 10.1016/S0378-1119(97)00426-5
    [18]
    LI Chenghua, ZHANG Huan, LI Ling, et al. Identification of a cathepsin D potentially involved in H2A cleavage from scallop Chlamys farreri[J]. Mol Biol Rep, 2010, 37(3): 1451-1460. doi: 10.1007/s11033-009-9534-2
    [19]
    JIA Airong, ZHANG Xiaohua. Molecular cloning, characterization and expression analysis of cathepsin D gene from turbot Scophthalmus maximus[J]. Fish Shellfish Immunol, 2009, 26(4): 606-613. doi: 10.1016/j.fsi.2008.09.011
    [20]
    ZHANG Dianchang, MA Jianjun, JIANG Jingjing, et al. Molecular characterization and expression analysis of lipopolysaccharide and β-1, 3-glucan-binding protein (LGBP) from pearl oyster Pinctada fucata[J]. Mol Biol Rep, 2010, 37(7): 3335-3343. doi: 10.1007/s11033-009-9920-9
    [21]
    沈锦玉, 李新华, 潘晓艺, 等. 哈维氏弧菌的主要致病因子及其特性分析[J]. 浙江大学学报: 农业与生命科学版, 2011, 37(2): 142-148.

    SHEN Jinyu, LI Xinhua, PAN Xiaoyi, et al. Characterization of major virulent factor produced by pathogenic Vibrio harveyi[J]. JZUS: Agric & Life Sci, 2011, 37(2): 142-148. (in Chinese)
  • Related Articles

    [1]YIN Xingjun, HUA Chuanxiang, ZHU Qingcheng. Analysis of morphological differences and discrimination between female and male Cololabis saira based on geometric morphometrics[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2024, 20(6): 104-111. DOI: 10.12131/20240077
    [2]ZHANG Yuqing, GUO Huayang, ZHANG Nan, LIU Baosuo, ZHU Kecheng, XIAN Lin, ZHU Tengfei, ZHANG Dianchang. Path analysis of partial growth-related traits for wild large yellow croaker (Larimichthys crocea) of different geographical populations[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2024, 20(3): 112-119. DOI: 10.12131/20230203
    [3]XIA Feiyu, ZHANG Xiumei, XU Pian, XU Ying, WANG Yihang. Comparative analysis of shell frame characteristics and mitochondrial 16S rRNA gene between wild and cultured mussels (Mytilus coruscus)[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2023, 19(5): 168-176. DOI: 10.12131/20230096
    [4]GAO Jin, WANG Yongbo, LIU Jinye, GUO Yilan, FU Shuyuan. Transcriptome analysis of Plectropomus leopardus liver under different flow velocity[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2022, 18(1): 107-117. DOI: 10.12131/20210125
    [5]Jiangtao LI, Kaiyu YANG, Xiaotong QIU, Junchao FANG, Feifei HUANG, Xiaolong QIU, Xiaojing LYU, Rishen LIANG, Qingqing LI, Li LIN. Comparison of growth and morphological characteristics of inbred and hybrid families of Micropterus salmoides from Foshan and Taiwan populations[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2021, 17(5): 1-9. DOI: 10.12131/20200262
    [6]WEI Lei, ZHU Shuqin, LIU Wei, ZHAO Jinliang, QIAN Yezhou, WU Chao, QIAN De. Comparison on morphology and body spots characteristics between backcross progenies and their parents of mandarin fish[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2020, 16(2): 1-7. DOI: 10.12131/20190219
    [7]GONG Fahui, ZHANG Dianchang, LIU Tiantian, ZHANG Nan, GUO Huayang, ZHOU Falin, HAUNG Jianhua, JIANG Shigui. Morphological comparative research of Metupenaeus ensis stocks in southeast coast of China[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2016, 12(6): 76-82. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-0780.2016.06.010
    [8]WANG Xu, XU Heng, ZOU Li, DU Xiao, WANG Fengli, ZHENG Wei, HAN Zhiqiang, SHUI Bonian. Morphological variation analysis of three differente geographic populations of Monodonta labio[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2013, 9(4): 22-27. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-0780.2013.04.004
    [9]HAN Zhen, XIAO Yongshuang, GAO Tianxiang. Comparison of morphological characteristics of 9 Larimichthys polyactis populations in China[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2012, 8(3): 25-33. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-0780.2012.03.004
    [10]ZHANG Wei, LI Chunhou, JIA Xiaoping, CHEN Peimao, FANG Liang. Multivariate analysis of organisms communities attached on concrete and iron reefs[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2009, 5(3): 30-35. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-2227.2009.03.005
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(12)

    1. 张方琪,陈嘉娴,候勇康,王丽君,廖韬梁,栗志民. 北部湾海域不同地理群体西施舌表型性状的相关性与通径分析. 中国渔业质量与标准. 2024(05): 17-25 .
    2. 王雨吉,孟学平,易乐飞. 基于转录组西施舌微卫星标记开发及隐种鉴定. 水产科学. 2022(02): 289-295 .
    3. 陈健,郭丹,翟子钦,喻达辉,白丽蓉. 西施舌形态性状与体质量性状的相关性分析. 南方水产科学. 2021(01): 45-51 . 本站查看
    4. 林建杰. 福建长乐西施舌资源现状及保护成效研究. 应用海洋学学报. 2020(04): 551-558 .
    5. 陈薛伟杰,郭健康,杨志,曹恒源,安苗. 贵州境内3个野生大眼鳜群体的形态差异. 中国水产科学. 2018(01): 34-43 .
    6. 朱明,申欣,朱笑琳,屠海淼,杨婕,孟学平. 西施舌3个群体H2A基因和nad6-nad1片段序列比较研究. 海洋科学. 2015(09): 26-32 .
    7. 孟学平,申欣,屠海淼,朱笑琳,赵娜娜,程汉良,阎斌论. 基于nad5的西施舌漳州群体遗传分化水平分析——以蛤蜊属2个物种差异水平为参照. 生态学报. 2015(08): 2635-2642 .
    8. 杨璐,陈明茹,杨圣云,胡文佳,程建新,叶观琼,纪雅宁,鲍姗姗. 水产种质资源保护区适应性管理研究. 海洋环境科学. 2014(01): 122-129 .
    9. 赵娜娜,孟学平,申欣,程汉良,于清,刘兆普. 两株西施舌内脏团细菌的分离及初步鉴定. 水产科学. 2013(02): 93-97 .
    10. 王旭,徐衡,邹莉,杜肖,王凤丽,郑伟,韩志强,水柏年. 3个单齿螺地理群体形态差异分析. 南方水产科学. 2013(04): 22-27 . 本站查看
    11. 孟学平,申欣,赵娜娜,田美,梁猛,郝珏,程汉良,阎斌伦,董志国. 漳州西施舌线粒体基因组全序列:腔蛤蜊属(Coelomactra)存在新种的证据. 海洋学报(中文版). 2013(03): 204-214 .
    12. 孟学平,申欣,赵娜娜,田美,曾云,陈建安,董志国,程汉良,阎斌伦. 基于ITS2和16S rRNA的西施舌群体遗传差异分析. 生态学报. 2013(24): 7882-7891 .

    Other cited types(4)

Catalog

    Article views (3970) PDF downloads (2631) Cited by(16)
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return