Volume 19 Issue 3
Jun.  2023
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Abstract
References
Related Articles
LI Xue, LI Yafang, CHEN Qinghua, NING Jiajia, WANG Lianggen, XU Lei, HUANG Delian, LIU Shuangshuang, ZHONG Chao, ZHANG Jian, WANG Xuehui, DU Feiyan. Structural characteristics and relative influencing factors of macrobenthos community in intertidal zone of Daya Bay[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2023, 19(3): 42-50. DOI: 10.12131/20220202
Citation: LI Xue, LI Yafang, CHEN Qinghua, NING Jiajia, WANG Lianggen, XU Lei, HUANG Delian, LIU Shuangshuang, ZHONG Chao, ZHANG Jian, WANG Xuehui, DU Feiyan. Structural characteristics and relative influencing factors of macrobenthos community in intertidal zone of Daya Bay[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2023, 19(3): 42-50. DOI: 10.12131/20220202
shu

Structural characteristics and relative influencing factors of macrobenthos community in intertidal zone of Daya Bay

  • 1.

    College of Marine Sciences, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai 201306, China

  • 2.

    South China Sea Fisheries Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences/Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Fishery Ecology and Environment/Key Laboratory of South China Sea Fishery Research Exploitation & Utilization, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Guangzhou 510300, China

  • 3.

    South China Institute of Environmental Science, Ministry of Ecology and Environment, Guangzhou 510530, China

  • 4.

    Sanya Tropical Fisheries Research Institute, Sanya 572018, China

More Information
  • Received Date: July 21, 2022
  • Revised Date: December 12, 2022
  • Accepted Date: January 06, 2023
  • Available Online: January 15, 2023
    Graphical Abstract
    • Abstract
  • In recent years, the structure of macrobenthic community and ecological functions of intertidal zone in Daya Bay have changed significantly due to the influence of various factors such as anthropogenic disturbances. In order to understand the changing patterns of ecosystem functioning in the coastal waters of Daya Bay, we obtained the data on the macrobenthos and habitats in six intertidal sections (Three sands, two muds and one artificial shoreline) in summer (August) and autumn (November) of 2021, and analyzed their community structure characteristics and influencing factors. The results show that a total of 118 species were identified, including 82 species in summer and 64 species in autumn, among which molluscs had the largest quantity in both seasons followed by arthropods and annelids. The mean biomasses of the six sampling sections in two seasons were 589.36 and 188.22 g·m−2, and the mean abundances were 356.39 and 1 010.3 ind·m−2, respectively, with molluscs and arthropods accounting for a higher proportion. The results of cluster analysis and multidimensional scaling show that the macrobenthic fauna community in the survey areas displayed significant spatial differences. The macrobenthos in the intertidal zone of Daya Bay could be divided into three communities: sand facies, mud facies and artificial shoreline, among which the artificial shoreline community had the highest diversity index and best community stability. Distance-based redundancy analysis indicates that the structure of intertidal macrobenthic community was mainly affected by sediment type and anthropogenic disturbance.
    • FullText(HTML)
    • References (37)
  • [1]
    蔡尔西, 林双淡, 张水浸, 等. 杭州湾北岸潮间带生态学研究I. 软相底栖动物群落调查[J]. 海洋学报, 1980, 2(4): 122-131.
    [2]
    李亚芳, 杜飞雁, 王亮根, 等. 底质类型对三亚湾潮间带大型底栖动物生态功能的影响[J]. 水产学报, 2018, 42(10): 1559-1571.
    [3]
    RANASINGHE J A, SCHIFF K C, MONTAGNE D E, et al. Benthic macrofaunal community condition in the Southern California Bight, 1994–2003[J]. Mar Pollut Bull, 2010, 60(6): 827-833.
    [4]
    杨万喜, 陈永寿. 中国沿岸潮间带生态学研究概况及深化研究的建议[J]. 东海海洋, 1997, 15(1): 1-7.
    [5]
    胡成业, 杜肖, 水玉跃, 等. 浙江6个列岛潮间带大型底栖动物分类多样性[J]. 中国水产科学, 2016, 23(2): 458-468.
    [6]
    DAUER D M. Biological criteria, environmental health and estuarine macrobenthic community structure[J]. Mar Pollut Bull, 1993, 26(5): 249-257. doi: 10.1016/0025-326X(93)90063-P
    [7]
    张舒怡, 何雪宝, 王建军, 等. 福建洛阳河口潮间带大型底栖甲壳动物群落及其功能群研究[J]. 生态学报, 2017, 37(18): 5961-5972.
    [8]
    付俊平. 浙江海岛岩礁区大型底栖生物生态学研究[D]. 青岛: 中国海洋大学, 2010: 2-10.
    [9]
    龚志军, 谢平, 唐汇涓, 等. 水体富营养化对大型底栖动物群落结构及多样性的影响[J]. 水生生物学报, 2011, 25(3): 210-216.
    [10]
    黄少峰, 刘玉, 李策, 等. 珠江口滩涂围垦对大型底栖动物群落的影响[J]. 应用与环境生物学报, 2011, 17(4): 499-503.
    [11]
    李荣冠, 江锦祥. 大亚湾核电站邻近埔渔洲红树林区软体动物生态研究[J]. 海洋科学集刊, 1997, 2(39): 115-122.
    [12]
    SANDERS H L. Benthic studies in Buzzards Bay. I. Animal-sediment relationships[J]. Limnol Oceanogr, 1958, 3(3): 245-258. doi: 10.4319/lo.1958.3.3.0245
    [13]
    覃胡林. 苍南县沿浦湾大型底栖动物群落结构及多样性研究[D]. 舟山: 浙江海洋大学, 2016: 2-10.
    [14]
    MUCHA A P, VASCONCELOS M , BORDALO A. Macrobenthic community in the Douro estuary: relations with trace metals and natural sediment characteristics[J]. Environ Pollut 2003, 121(2): 169-180.
    [15]
    GRACA M A S, PINTO P, CORTES R, et al. Factors affecting macroinvertebrate richness and diversity in Portuguese streams: a two-scale analysis[J]. Int Rev Hydrobiol, 2004, 89(2): 151-164. doi: 10.1002/iroh.200310705
    [16]
    杜飞雁, 王雪辉, 李纯厚, 等. 大亚湾大型底栖动物物种多样性现状[J]. 南方水产, 2008, 4(6): 33-41.
    [17]
    RYU J, KHIM J S, KANG S G, et al. The impact of heavy metal pollution gradients in sediments on benthic macrofauna at population and community levels[J]. Environ Pollut, 2011, 159(10): 2622-2629. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2011.05.034
    [18]
    ZHANG L, XIONG L L, LI J L, et al. Long-term changes of nutrients and biocenoses indicating the anthropogenic influences on ecosystem in Jiaozhou Bay and Daya Bay, China[J]. Mar Pollut Bull, 2021, 168: 112406. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2021.112406
    [19]
    吴启泉, 郑凤武, 鲁琳, 等. 大亚湾红树林区底相大型动物的群落[J]. 台湾海峡, 1992, 11(2): 161-166.
    [20]
    于芳. 大连长兴岛潮间带大型底栖动物的分布特征及其季节性变化[D]. 大连: 辽宁师范大学, 2013: 36-39.
    [21]
    STEPHENSON T A. The universal features of zonation between tide-marks on rocky coasts[J]. J Ecol, 1949, 37(2): 289-305. doi: 10.2307/2256610
    [22]
    CLARKE K R, WARWICK R M. Change in marine com-munities: an approach to statistical analysis and inter-pretation[M]. 2nd ed. Plymouth: Primer E, 2001: 71-72.
    [23]
    朱四喜, 周唯, 章飞军. 舟山群岛不同底质潮间带夏季大型底栖动物的群落结构特征[J]. 海洋学研究, 2010, 28(3): 23-33.
    [24]
    李亚芳, 杜飞雁, 王亮根, 等. 粤西海陵湾养殖区邻近海域大型底栖动物生态学特征[J]. 海洋与湖沼, 2018, 49(6): 1294-1307.
    [25]
    WARWICK R M. A new method for detecting pollution effects on marine macrobenthic communities[J]. Mar Biol, 1986, 92(4): 557-562. doi: 10.1007/BF00392515
    [26]
    黄银盈. 不同围垦方式对南汇和崇明东滩湿地大型底栖动物的影响[D].上海: 华东师范大学, 2022: 35-39.
    [27]
    李荣冠, 江锦祥, 吴启泉, 等. 大亚湾核电站邻近水域潮间带生物数量与分布[J]. 台湾海峡, 1999, 18(4): 365-371.
    [28]
    李荣冠, 江锦祥, 鲁琳, 等. 大亚湾潮间带底栖生物种类组成与分布[J]. 海洋与湖沼, 1993, 24(5): 527-535.
    [29]
    梁超愉, 汉华, 吴进锋. 大亚湾潮间带生物种类组成、数量分布及生物多样性研究[J]. 南方水产, 2005, 1(3): 42-48.
    [30]
    陈丙温. 大亚湾和考洲洋潮间带大型底栖动物群落研究[D]. 厦门: 厦门大学, 2020: 19-63.
    [31]
    王友绍, 王肇鼎, 黄良民. 近20年来大亚湾生态环境的变化及其发展趋势[J]. 2004, 23(5): 85-95.
    [32]
    杜飞雁, 张汉华, 李纯厚, 等. 大亚湾大型底栖动物种类组成及物种多样性[J]. 中国水产科学, 2008, 15(2): 252-259.
    [33]
    YU W W, ZHANG D, LIAO J J, et al. Linking ecosystem services to a coastal bay ecosystem health assessment: a comparative case study between Jiaozhou Bay and Daya Bay, China[J]. Ecol Indic, 2022, 135(1): 108530.
    [34]
    高爱根, 陈全震, 曾江宁, 等. 浙江苍南泥相潮间带春末底栖动物生态特征[J]. 海洋科学, 2006, 30(5): 92-96.
    [35]
    汤雁滨, 廖一波, 寿鹿, 等. 珊瑚藻类对南麂列岛潮间带底栖生物群落多样性的影响[J]. 生物多样性, 2014, 22(5): 640-648.
    [36]
    DOLBETH M, CARDOSO P, GRILO T, et al. Drivers of estuarine benthic species distribution patterns following a restoration of a seagrass bed: a functional trait analyses[J]. Mar Pollut Bull, 2013, 72(1): 47-54. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2013.05.001
    [37]
    李亚芳, 杜飞雁, 王亮根, 等. 基于生物性状分析方法的不同恢复阶段无瓣海桑人工林湿地大型底栖动物生态功能研究[J]. 南方水产科学, 2018, 14(3): 10-19.
    • Related Articles

  • Related Articles

    [1]WEI Zhengkun, DONG Hongbiao, ZHAO Wen, CHEN Fei, ZHANG Chuanxiang, CHEN Jian, GONG Baohua, ZHU Changbo, ZHANG Jiasong. Anesthetic effect and tissue oxidative injury for Litopenaeus vannamei by two anesthetics[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2023, 19(1): 136-146. DOI: 10.12131/20220070
    [2]ZHAO Xiaoyu, SU Haochang, XU Yu, XU Wujie, HU Xiaojuan, WEN Guoliang, CAO Yucheng, YU Zhaolong. Removal of sulphonamide resistance sul1 gene in water source and pond water by fishery oxidants in aquaculture[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2021, 17(3): 46-53. DOI: 10.12131/20200231
    [3]ZHANG Linbao, CHEN Haigang, TIAN Fei, SUN Wei, ZHANG Zhe, CAI Wengui. Gender differences in neurotoxicity and oxidative damage of triazophos on Perna viridis[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2020, 16(6): 75-80. DOI: 10.12131/20200097
    [4]WANG Haifeng, CHENG Yongxu, LI Jinghao, XI Yewen, LI Jiayao. Effects of desiccation and resubmersion on oxidative stress response of crayfish (Procambarus clarkii)[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2019, 15(5): 69-76. DOI: 10.12131/20190059
    [5]ZHANG Bo, MENG Zihao, LIU Baosuo, LI Haimei, SU Jiaqi, HUANG Guiju, WU Kaichang, YU Dahui. Effect of nucleus-inserting surgery damage on anti-oxidation and immunity of pearl oyster (Pinctada fucata)[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2017, 13(5): 72-77. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-0780.2017.05.010
    [6]OU Youjun, CHEN Shixi, WANG Pengfei, LI Jia'er, WEN Jiufu, WANG Wen, XIE Mujiao. Study on oxidative stress response and physiological metabolism related indices of Trachinotus ovatus under hyp-oxia stress[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2017, 13(3): 120-124. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-0780.2017.03.016
    [7]LIU Xujia, HUANG Guoqiang, PENG Yinhui. Effect of different dissolved oxygen levels on growth, energy metabolism and oxidative stress of Mugil cephalus[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2015, 11(4): 88-94. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-0780.2015.04.013
    [8]DOU Yong, QIAO Xiuting, CHEN Limei, ZHOU Wenli. Study on oxidative stress and damage of Cyclina sinensis exposed to naphthalene[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2014, 10(4): 39-44. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-0780.2014.04.007
    [9]ZHANG Ting, LUO Yuliang. Effect of Fenpropathrin on Na+-K+-ATPase and histomorphology of Cyprinus carpio gills[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2013, 9(6): 41-46. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-0780.2013.06.007
    [10]YANG Tao, CHEN Haigang, CAI Wengui, QIN Jiefang, JIA Xiaoping. Oxidative stress and damage of Perna viridis by exposure to phenanthrene and benzo (b) fluoranthene[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2011, 7(4): 24-29. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-0780.2011.04.004

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(9)

    1. 张潇潇，杨少森，邹翠云，张勇，黄锦雄，甘松永，秦真东，黄玮坪，陈永南，吴锦辉，林蠡. 蓝圆鲹的胚胎及胚后发育特征观察. 水产学报. 2025(01): 105-115 .
    2. 杨瑞兰，刘彦斌，赵红雪，刘凯，杨立强，肖伟，赛清云，田永华，赖章龙，阮超岭，柳婷，刘哲，连总强. 大鼻吻鮈胚胎发育特征和初孵仔鱼形态观察. 甘肃农业大学学报. 2024(01): 49-58 .
    3. 王岳松，徐林，杨洋，程睿，王崇，何大江，黎国樑，马海涛，毕建启，陈锋，万正平，张志明. 长鳍光唇鱼(Acrossocheilus longipinnis)人工繁殖和早期发育研究. 南方水产科学. 2024(02): 63-72 . 本站查看
    4. 李文康，骆小年，段友健，李姣，吴晨. 鸭绿沙塘鳢仔稚鱼发育观察及饥饿不可逆点的确定. 大连海洋大学学报. 2023(01): 32-42 .
    5. 石叶忠，朱双全，潘月，申屠琰，冯彬彬，程鑫，张克鑫，朱卫东，夏荣兴，张玉明，竺俊全. 宽鳍鱲仔稚鱼发育. 浙江海洋大学学报(自然科学版). 2023(02): 136-142 .
    6. 王新月，訾方泽，葛建民，陈生熬，姚娜，肖青，艾尼瓦尔·依布拉音. 盐碱胁迫下扁吻鱼幼鱼耐受性分析. 新疆农业科学. 2023(06): 1540-1547 .
    7. 陈思奇，朱永久，吴兴兵，杨德国，李晓莉. 大鳍鳠胚胎及仔稚鱼发育观察. 南方水产科学. 2023(06): 60-70 . 本站查看
    8. 邢雨忻，骆小年，李姣，段友健，季辰跃，常建太. 马口鱼仔稚鱼发育观察及饥饿不可逆点的确定. 大连海洋大学学报. 2023(06): 972-979 .
    9. 王程欣，陈生熬，王新月，訾方泽，林旭元，魏齐. 新疆特克斯河斑重唇鱼胚胎发育和胚后发育观察. 动物学杂志. 2022(05): 668-677 .

    Other cited types(4)

Catalog

    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML
    Article views PDF downloads Cited by(13)
    Related

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co., Ltd.  

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return