Volume 18 Issue 5
Oct.  2022
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Abstract
References
Related Articles
LIU Jingbin, TANG Hao, XU Liuxiong, SUN Qiuyang, LIU Wei, YIN Liqiang, ZHANG Feng. Evaluation of scale effect on hydrodynamic force of V-shaped otter board based on CFD[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2022, 18(5): 128-137. DOI: 10.12131/20210355
Citation: LIU Jingbin, TANG Hao, XU Liuxiong, SUN Qiuyang, LIU Wei, YIN Liqiang, ZHANG Feng. Evaluation of scale effect on hydrodynamic force of V-shaped otter board based on CFD[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2022, 18(5): 128-137. DOI: 10.12131/20210355
shu

Evaluation of scale effect on hydrodynamic force of V-shaped otter board based on CFD

  • 1.

    College of Marine Sciences, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai 201306, China

  • 2.

    Key Laboratory of Sustainable Exploitation of Oceanic Fisheries Resources/National Engineering Research Center for Oceanic Fisheries, Shanghai 201306, China

More Information
  • Received Date: November 27, 2021
  • Revised Date: January 05, 2022
  • Accepted Date: February 06, 2022
  • Available Online: February 27, 2022
    Graphical Abstract
    • Abstract
  • The main way to study the hydrodynamic characteristics of the otter board is to build a physical model to measure its hydrodynamic characteristics based on the similarity law. In this study, we analyzed the lift, drag coefficient and flow field distribution of V-type otter board with three scale ratios (1∶2, 1∶3 and 1∶4) and three thickness (2, 5 and 10 mm), then we compared them with the corresponding model test results to explore the influence of different physical model scales on hydrodynamic estimation of the otter boards. The results show that: 1) With the increase of the angle of attack, the drag coefficient of otter board with all scales gradually increased, while the lift coefficient first increased and then decreased, and the lift-drag ratio decreased gradually. 2) When the angle of attack reached 30°, the apparent separation vortex appeared at the back of the otter board, resulting in the decrease of simulated lift force. 3) With the increase of the otter board model scale, the separation effect of the boundary layer on the otter board surface and the separation vortex of the flow field in the wake area increased gradually, and the lift, drag and lift-drag ratio of the otter board also showed an increasing tendency. The thickness of the mesh plate had little effect on the flow field, lift and resistance, and the average error of the maximum lift coefficient relative to the model test was 4.97%. As the model scale increased, the prediction error of hydrodynamic force decreased gradually.
    • FullText(HTML)
    • References (31)
  • [1]
    刘宏伟. 蝠翼式拖网网板的水动力特性研究 [D]. 大连: 大连理工大学, 2018: 1-9.
    [2]
    MELLIBOVSKY F, PRAT J, NOTTI E, et al. Testing otter board hydrodynamic performances in wind tunnel facilities[J]. Ocean Engin, 2015, 104: 52-62. doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2015.04.064
    [3]
    MELLIBOVSKY F, PRAT J, NOTTI E, et al. Otter board hydrodynamic performance testing in flume tank and wind tunnel facilities-Science Direct[J]. Ocean Engin, 2018, 149: 238-244. doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2017.12.034
    [4]
    刘健, 黄洪亮, 吴越, 等 2种立式曲面缝翼式网板水动力学性能的试验研究 [J]. 南方水产科学, 2015, 11(1): 68-74.
    [5]
    SU X, LU H S, FENG B, et al. Hydrodynamic characteristics of the double-winged otter board in the deep waters of the Mauritanian Sea[J]. Chin J Oceanol Limnol, 2018: 1417-1424.
    [6]
    YOU X X, HU F X, KUMAZAWA T, et al. Performance of new hyper-lift trawl door for both mid-water and bottom trawling [J]. Ocean Engin, 2020, 199:106989.
    [7]
    SALA A, FARRAN J, ANTONIJUAN J, et al. Performance and impact on the seabed of an existing- and an experimental-otter board: comparison between model testing and full-scale sea trials[J]. Fish Res, 2009, 100: 156-166. doi: 10.1016/j.fishres.2009.07.004
    [8]
    YOU X X, HU F X, Z X, et al. Effect of wingtip flow on hydrodynamic characteristics of cambered otter board [J]. Ocean Engin, 2021, 222:108611.
    [9]
    BALASH C, BLAKE W, STERLING D. Seeking maximum effectiveness and efficiency for large multi-sail penaeid otter boards [J/OL]. Ocean Engin, 2020, 200:107093.
    [10]
    宋科委, 郭春雨, 孙聪, 等. 实尺度船舶阻力计算及尺度效应研究[J]. 华中科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 49(6): 74-80.
    [11]
    朴倉斗, 松田皎, 胡夫祥. 反り比の異なる湾曲板の流体特性に及ぼす底面の影響[J]. 日本水產學會誌, 1993, 59(4): 627-632.
    [12]
    XU Q C, HUANG L Y, LI X, et al. Parameter optimization of a rectangular cambered otter board using response surface method [J/OL]. Ocean Engin, 2021, 220: 108475.
    [13]
    CHU W H, CHEN G, YE X C, et al. Hydrodynamic performance and structural response characteristics of the double-slotted vertical cambered V-Type otter board[J]. Aquac Fish, 2020(5): 201-209.
    [14]
    XU Q C, HUANG L Y, ZHAO F F, et al. Study on the hydrodynamic characteristics of the rectangular V-type otter board using computational fluid dynamics[J]. Fish Sci, 2017, 83(2): 1-10.
    [15]
    刘宏伟, 赵云鹏, 毕春伟. 不同展弦比的矩形曲面网板水动力性能的数值模拟[C]//第十四届全国水动力学学术会议暨第二十八届全国水动力学研讨会文集(上册). 北京: 海洋出版社, 2017: 739-745.
    [16]
    TAKAHASHI Y, FUJIMORI Y, HU F, et al. Design of trawl otter boards using computational fluid dynamics[J]. Fish Res, 2015, 161: 400-407. doi: 10.1016/j.fishres.2014.08.011
    [17]
    YOU X X, HU F X, DONG S C, et al. Shape optimization approach for cambered otter board using neural network and multi-objective genetic algorithm.[J]. Appl Ocean Res, 2020, 100(C): 102148.
    [18]
    MATTHEW J, MCHUGH M K, BROADHURST D J, et al. Relative benthic disturbances of conventional and novel otter boards and ground gears[J]. Fish Sci, 2020, 86(6): 245-254.
    [19]
    刘志强, 许柳雄, 唐浩, 等. 立式双曲面网板水动力性能及流场可视化研究[J]. 水产学报, 2020, 44(8): 1360-1370.
    [20]
    李崇聪. V型网板水动力性能和数值模拟初步研究 [D]. 青岛: 中国海洋大学, 2012: 17-28.
    [21]
    SHIH T H, LIOU W W, SHABBIR A, et al. A new K-ε eddy viscosity model for high reynolds number turbulent flows[J]. Comput Fluids, 1995, 24(3): 227-238. doi: 10.1016/0045-7930(94)00032-T
    [22]
    刘志强. 中层网板水动力性能及流场可视化研究—以立式双曲面网板为例 [D]. 上海: 上海海洋大学, 2020: 34-51.
    [23]
    刘志强, 许柳雄, 唐浩, 等. 不同工作姿态下立式双曲面网板水动力及周围流场特性研究[J]. 南方水产科学, 2020, 16(2): 87-98. doi: 10.12131/20190221
    [24]
    朴倉斗, 松田皎, 東海正. タフト法による平板の周りの流れの可視化[J]. 日本水產學會誌, 1994, 60(2): 193-199.
    [25]
    朴倉斗, 松田皎, 胡夫祥. 縦横比の異なる平板の揚抗力特性に及ぼす底面の影響[J]. 日本水產學會誌, 1993, 59(1): 79-84.
    [26]
    SHEN X L, HU F X, KUMAZAWA T, et al. Hydrodynamic characteristics of a hyper-lift otter board with wing-end plates[J]. Fish Sci, 2015, 81(3): 1-10.
    [27]
    左玲玉, 司海清, 李耀, 等. 基于Richardson外推法的CFD离散误差分析 [J]. 指挥控制与仿真, 2022, 44(1): 58-62.
    [28]
    ROY C J, OBERKAMPF W L. Verification and validation in computational fluid dynamics[J]. Progr Aerospace Sci, 2002, 38(3): 209-272. doi: 10.1016/S0376-0421(02)00005-2
    [29]
    STERN F, WILSON R. Comprehensive approach to verification and validation of CFD simulations−Part 1: methodology and procedures[J]. ASME J Fluids Eng, 2002, 124(3): 810. doi: 10.1115/1.1492827
    [30]
    WILSON R V, STERB F, COLENAN H W, et al. Comprehensive approach to verification and validation of CFD simulations−Part 2: application for rans simulation of a cargo/container ship[J]. ASME J Fluids Eng, 2001, 123(4): 803-810. doi: 10.1115/1.1412236
    [31]
    康顺, 石磊, 戴丽萍, 等. CFD模拟的误差分析及网格收敛性研究[J]. 工程热物理学报, 2010, 31(12): 2009-2013.
    • Related Articles

  • Related Articles

    [1]LUO Yingying, HUANG Hui, LI Laihao, HAO Shuxian, CHEN Shengjun, WEI Ya, CEN Jianwei, XIANG Huan. Quality improvement and mechanism analysis of non-rinsing tilapia surimi gel[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2025, 21(2): 164-173. DOI: 10.12131/20240238
    [2]CUI Qiaoyan, LI Laihao, CHEN Tianyu, CHEN Shengjun, HUANG Hui, ZHAO Yongqiang, LI Chunsheng. Improvement of gel strength of fermented tilapia surimi by Lactiplantibacillus plantarum through inhibition of protein hydrolysis[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2024, 20(4): 1-10. DOI: 10.12131/20240060
    [3]WANG Xin, LI Mengzhe, ZHANG Wei, KONG Yunfei, XIONG Zhiyu, SHI Tong, BAO Yulong, YUAN Li, ZHANG Shiyong, WANG Minghua, CHEN Xiaohui, GAO Ruichang. Evaluation of gel properties of heat-induced surimi of Ictalurus punctatus from four genealogies[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2023, 19(3): 164-172. DOI: 10.12131/20220198
    [4]GE Mengmeng, SHEN Jiandong, TANG Xiaohang, XIA Wenshui, XU Yanshun. Optimization of thermal sterilization process for low-acid and acidified instant laver[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2022, 18(6): 127-136. DOI: 10.12131/20220003
    [5]QI Bo, YANG Shaoling, WANG Yueqi, HU Xiao, YANG Xianqing, PAN Chuang, LI Laihao, WANG Lunan. Effect of carboxymethyl agar on gel properties of tilapia surimi[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2022, 18(2): 83-89. DOI: 10.12131/20210311
    [6]LIU Fangfang, LIN Wanling, HAN Yingxue, LI Laihao, LI Chunsheng, YANG Xianqing, ZHOU Wenguo. Basic properties of surimi gel of five freshwater fish[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2021, 17(2): 114-121. DOI: 10.12131/20200220
    [7]YIN Min, XIE Chongyou, PU Deyong, HUANG Jing, WANG Zhijian. Microstructure of oogenesis in Sinibrama taeniatus[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2019, 15(2): 127-132. DOI: 10.12131/20180181
    [8]YU Shanshan, WANG Qinglin, DONG Yunwei. Effects of parent acclimation and heat-shock at gastrula on growth and development of sea cucumber larvae[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2015, 11(4): 46-52. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-0780.2015.04.007
    [9]ZHANG Yuemei, BAO Yulong, LUO Yongkang, WANG Hang. Changes of biogenic amines and quality indicators of grass carp (Ctenpharyngodon idellus) during chilled storage and effect on biogenic amines during thermal processing[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2013, 9(4): 56-61. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-0780.2013.04.010
    [10]HUANG Jiansheng, LU Weihua, ZOU Weili, WANG Yao. Determination of residual polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) in blubber of whale by gel permeation chromatography and gas chromatography/mass spectrometry[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2009, 5(4): 9-12. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-2227.2009.04.002

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(11)

    1. 张婷娟，吴风超，周纷. 市售生姜油对白鲢鱼糜凝胶品质特性的影响. 食品科技. 2025(01): 146-153 .
    2. 金铮，于婉莹，赵文宇，刘宇轩，祁立波，白帆，董秀萍. 鲟鱼重组鱼排3D打印特性的研究. 食品与发酵工业. 2024(03): 241-249 .
    3. 步营，程亚佳，厉寒，朱文慧，励建荣，李学鹏，季广仁. 发芽糙米匀浆对带鱼鱼糜凝胶特性的影响. 农业工程学报. 2024(18): 292-301 .
    4. 林雅文，刘佳晨，李艾靑，高月，励建荣，李学鹏. 不同干燥方法对南美白对虾理化特性和微观结构的影响. 食品科学. 2023(19): 74-81 .
    5. 邹怡茜，陈海强，潘卓官，肖苏尧，周爱梅. 超高压耦合热处理对鳙鱼鱼糜凝胶特性和水分迁移的影响. 现代食品科技. 2022(12): 272-280 .
    6. 宋春勇，洪鹏志，周春霞，陈艾霖，冯瑞. 大豆油和预乳化大豆油对金线鱼鱼糜凝胶品质的影响. 食品科学. 2021(08): 90-97 .
    7. 梁雯雯，杨天，郑志红，郭建，陈胜军，汪秋宽，丛海花. 升温方式对二段加热鲢鱼糜水分分布和品质的影响. 大连海洋大学学报. 2021(04): 646-652 .
    8. 刘芳芳，林婉玲，李来好，吴燕燕，杨少玲，黄卉，杨贤庆，林织. 海鲈鱼糜加工及凝胶形成过程中蛋白质的变化机理. 食品科学. 2020(14): 15-22 .
    9. 郑静静，林琳，张艳凌，陆剑锋，姜绍通. 不同解冻方式对熟制小龙虾理化特性的比较分析. 现代食品科技. 2020(09): 188-194+108 .
    10. 李钊，李宁宁，刘玉，赵圣明，康壮丽，朱明明，计红芳，何鸿举，马汉军. 超高压对肌原纤维蛋白结构及其凝胶特性影响的研究进展. 食品与发酵工业. 2020(21): 304-309 .
    11. 王菲，隋好林. 不同水产养殖区福寿鱼的鱼糜凝胶品质研究. 江西水产科技. 2019(06): 10-14 .

    Other cited types(14)

Catalog

    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML
    Article views (552) PDF downloads (31) Cited by(25)
    Related

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co., Ltd.  

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return