CHEN Jian, GUO Dan, ZHAI Ziqing, YU Dahui, BAI Lirong. Correlation analysis of morphological traits and body mass traits of Coelomactra antiquata[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2021, 17(1): 45-51. DOI: 10.12131/20200180
Citation: CHEN Jian, GUO Dan, ZHAI Ziqing, YU Dahui, BAI Lirong. Correlation analysis of morphological traits and body mass traits of Coelomactra antiquata[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2021, 17(1): 45-51. DOI: 10.12131/20200180

Correlation analysis of morphological traits and body mass traits of Coelomactra antiquata

More Information
  • Received Date: August 25, 2020
  • Revised Date: October 13, 2020
  • Accepted Date: October 30, 2020
  • Available Online: December 01, 2020
  • To evaluate the effects of shell phenotypic traits on the  body mass of Coelomactra antiquata wild population, we measured eight traits including shell height (SH), shell length (SL), shell width (SW), anterior length (PL), posterior length (PL), shell mass (SM), visceral-mass mass (VM) and body mass (BM) from 178 individuals of C. antiquata. The shell traits (SH, SL, SW, AL, GL, SM) were used as independent variables and mass traits (BM, VM) as dependent variables for path coefficient and multiple regression analysis. The results show that the maximal coefficient of variance was in visceral-mass mass, with very significant difference in correction coefficients among the eight quantitative traits of C. antiquata (P<0.01), and the correlation coefficients between body mass and visceral-mass mass and that of shell height and shell mass were the highest, with values of 0.831 and 0.646, respectively. Shell width and shell mass had the greatest direct influence on body mass and visceral-mass mass, and the path coefficients were 0.362 and 0.487, respectively, and the degree of determination analysis was consistent with the path analysis results. The optimal multiple regression equations of shell traits on mass traits were established through stepwise multiple regression analysis (R2<0.85).

  • [1]
    刘德经, 朱善央. 福建与江苏西施舌群体形态差异研究[J]. 南方水产, 2010, 6(2): 29-34. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-2227.2010.02.005
    [2]
    孟学平, 郝珏, 梁猛, 等. 西施舌可食部分微量元素分析与评价[J]. 食品科学, 2012(4): 167-172.
    [3]
    KONG L F, LI Q. Genetic evidence for the existence of cryptic species in an endangered clam Coelomactra antiquata[J]. Mar Biol, 2009, 156: 1507-1515. doi: 10.1007/s00227-009-1190-5
    [4]
    LIU H, ZHU J X, SUN H L, et al. The clam, Xishi tongue Coelomactra antiquata (Spengler), a promising new candidate for aquaculture in China[J]. Aquaculture, 2006, 255(1/2/3/4): 402-409.
    [5]
    孟学平, 高如承, 董志国, 等. 西施舌营养成分分析与评价[J]. 海洋科学, 2007, 31(1): 17-22. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3096.2007.01.004
    [6]
    李振华, 陈月忠, 周永东, 等. 福建长乐海蚌保护区海蚌软体部的营养成分分析与评价[J]. 食品科学, 2014, 35(5): 176-182. doi: 10.7506/spkx1002-6630-201405035
    [7]
    温扬敏, 万端静, 谢永华, 等. 西施舌对糖尿病小鼠血脂及抗氧化活性的影响[J]. 西部中医药, 2015, 28(10): 19-21. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-6852.2015.10.006
    [8]
    杨维群, 温扬敏, 林文东, 等. 西施舌多糖对人食管鳞癌裸鼠移植瘤作用的研究[J]. 天然产物研究与开发, 2015, 27(8): 1402-1406.
    [9]
    方民杰. 长乐沿海西施舌资源的初步调查[J]. 福建水产, 2013, 35(4): 312-316. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-5601.2013.04.011
    [10]
    饶小珍, 许友勤, 陈寅山, 等. 西施舌的核型分析[J]. 动物学杂志, 2003, 38(2): 2-5. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0250-3263.2003.02.001
    [11]
    YI L, MA K Y, QIN J, et al. Insights into cryptic diversity and adaptive evolution of the clam Coelomactra antiquata (Spengler, 1802) from comparative transcriptomics[J]. Mar Biodiv, 2019, 49: 2311-2322. doi: 10.1007/s12526-019-00964-w
    [12]
    KONG L F, LI Q, QIU Z. Genetic and morphological differentiation in the clam Coelomactra antiquata (Bivalvia: Veneroida) along the coast of China[J]. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol, 2007, 343(1): 110-117.
    [13]
    KONG L F, LI Q. Genetic comparison of cultured and wild populations of the clam Coelomactra antiquata (Spengler) in China using AFLP markers[J]. Aquaculture, 2007, 271(1/2/3/4): 152-161.
    [14]
    孟学平, 王帅, 高如承, 等. 西施舌群体遗传结构及分化的RAPD分析[J]. 海洋科学, 2011, 35(2): 6-9.
    [15]
    邹杰, 彭慧婧, 张守都, 等. 施氏獭蛤壳体表型性状对体质量的影响分析[J]. 水产科学, 2020, 39(4): 573-8.
    [16]
    黄建盛, 郭志雄, 陈刚, 等. 4月龄军曹鱼幼鱼形态性状与体质量的相关性及通径分析[J]. 海洋科学, 2019, 43(8): 72-79. doi: 10.11759/hykx20190318001
    [17]
    吴水清, 郑乐云, 罗辉玉, 等. 杂交石斑鱼 (斜带石斑鱼♀×赤点石斑鱼♂) 与其亲本形态性状比较研究[J]. 南方水产科学, 2017, 13(5): 47-54. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-0780.2017.05.007
    [18]
    张雷雷, 滕爽爽, 李腾腾, 等. 不同月龄青蛤形态性状对活体质量的影响分析[J]. 海洋科学, 2019, 43(12): 74-80.
    [19]
    谭才钢, 刘宝锁, 张东玲, 等. 合浦珠母贝主要形态性状与体质量的灰色关联分析[J]. 南方水产科学, 2015, 11(2): 35-40. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-0780.2015.02.005
    [20]
    冯建彬, 马克异, 李家乐. 日本沼虾养殖群体主要形态性状对体质量的通径分析[J]. 上海海洋大学学报, 2019, 28(2): 219-226.
    [21]
    张龙, 石林林, 李艳和. 克氏原螯虾形态与体重的通径分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2019, 35(18): 148-153. doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb18020017
    [22]
    张新明, 程顺峰, 张敏. 解放眉足蟹形态性状对重量性状影响的效果分析[J]. 中国水产科学, 2020, 27(1): 62-74.
    [23]
    刘文广, 林坚士, 何毛贤. 不同贝龄华贵栉孔扇贝数量性状的通径分析[J]. 南方水产科学, 2012, 8(1): 43-48. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-0780.2012.01.007
    [24]
    韩自强, 李琪. 长牡蛎壳橙品系形态性状与体质量的相关及通径分析[J]. 中国海洋大学学报 (自然科学版), 2017, 47(12): 46-52.
    [25]
    魏海军, 邓正华, 陈明强, 等. 棕带仙女蛤数量性状的相关与通径分析[J]. 南方水产科学, 2019, 15(6): 1-7. doi: 10.12131/20190045
    [26]
    梁健, 王俊杰, 郭永军, 等. 不同地理群体菲律宾蛤仔表型性状的相关性与通径分析[J]. 水产科学, 2020, 39(1): 40-47.
    [27]
    郭华阳, 陈明强, 王雨, 等. 黄边糙鸟蛤野生群体主要经济性状间的相关性及通径分析[J]. 南方水产科学, 2013, 9(2): 1-8. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-0780.2013.02.001
    [28]
    闫喜武, 王琰, 郭文学, 等. 四角蛤蜊形态性状对重量性状的影响效果分析[J]. 水产学报, 2011, 35(10): 1513-1518.
    [29]
    郑怀平, 孙泽伟, 张涛, 等. 华贵栉孔扇贝1龄贝数量性状的相关性及通径分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2009, 25(20): 322-326.
    [30]
    邓正华, 陈明强, 李有宁, 等. 野生大珠母贝形态性状对湿重和壳重的相关性及通径分析[J]. 南方农业学报, 2018, 49(12): 203-208.
    [31]
    郭文学, 闫喜武, 肖露阳, 等. 中国蛤蜊壳形态性状对体质量性状的影响[J]. 大连海洋大学学报, 2013, 28(1): 49-54. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-1388.2013.01.010
    [32]
    田莹, 郝寿康, 王艺霏, 等. 布氏蚶壳尺寸和体质量性状的相关性与回归分析[J]. 水产学杂志, 2018, 31(6): 18-22. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-3832.2018.06.005
    [33]
    张伟杰, 常亚青, 丁君, 等. 日本镜蛤壳尺寸与重量性状的相关与回归分析[J]. 海洋与湖沼, 2013, 44(3): 796-800. doi: 10.11693/hyhz201303039039
    [34]
    张超, 李永仁, 郭永军, 等. 毛蚶天津群体形态性状对体质量的影响研究[J]. 海洋通报, 2019, 38(4): 400-404.
    [35]
    刘辉, 张兴志, 鹿瑶, 等. 菲律宾蛤仔橙色品系壳形态性状对质量性状的通径及多元回归分析[J]. 大连海洋大学学报, 2015, 30(5): 514-518.
  • Related Articles

    [1]ZHU Shuli, CHEN Weitao, WU Zhi, XIA Yuguo, YANG Jiping, LI Yuefei, LI Jie. Preliminary investigation of fish diversity in middle and lower reaches of Pearl River based on environmental DNA technology[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2024, 20(1): 120-129. DOI: 10.12131/20230111
    [2]XIE Yufang, WU Peng, LIU Yong, XIAO Yayuan, TANG Guanglong, WANG Teng, LIN Lin, LI Chunhou. Study on habitat suitability of Coilia mystus in Pearl River Estuary, China[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2023, 19(1): 22-29. DOI: 10.12131/20220029
    [3]LI Hongting, ZHANG Shuai, ZOU Keshu, CHEN Zuozhi, CHEN Xiaolei, JIANG Peiwen, CAO Yiting, LI Min. Establishment and optimization of environmental DNA extraction method from water of Pearl River Estuary[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2022, 18(3): 30-37. DOI: 10.12131/20210304
    [4]CHEN Zhi, CAI Xingwei, ZHANG Qingfeng, LI Gaojun, MA Chunlai, SHEN Zhixin. Preliminary construction and comparative analysis of environmental DNA metabarcoding reference database of freshwater fishes in Hainan Island[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2022, 18(3): 1-12. DOI: 10.12131/20210339
    [5]XIONG Pengli, CHEN Zuozhi, HOU Gang, ZHANG Shuai, QIU Yongsong, FAN Jiangtao, XU Shannan. Decadal change in biological traits of Collichthys lucidus in Pearl River Estuary[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2021, 17(6): 31-38. DOI: 10.12131/20210072
    [6]YAN Yali, ZHANG Nan, GUO Huayang, GUO Liang, ZHU Kecheng, LIU Baosuo, ZHANG Dianchang. Species identification and phylogenetic relationship in Siganidae based on DNA barcoding[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2019, 15(1): 100-105. DOI: 10.12131/20180083
    [7]SHUAI Fangmin, LI Zhiquan, LIU Guowen, LI Xinhui, LI Yuefei, YANG Jiping, LI Jie. Resource status of Japanese eel (Anguilla japonica) in the Pearl River Estuary[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2015, 11(2): 85-89. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-0780.2015.02.012
    [8]GAO Yuan, LAI Zini, WANG Chao, PANG Shixun, WEI Taili, XIE Wenping, YANG Wanling. Community characteristics of zooplankton in Pearl River Estuary in summer of 2006[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2008, 4(1): 10-15.
    [9]WANG Di, LIN Zhaojin. Spatial and temporal variations of fish community structure in the Pearl River Estuary waters[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2006, 2(4): 37-45.
    [10]YANG Lin, ZHANG Xufeng, ZHANG Peng, TAN Yongguang. Composition of by-catch of shrimping beam trawl in the Pearl River Estuary, China[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2005, 1(1): 27-34.
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(11)

    1. 郭瑶杰,万武波,王海山,叶乐,陈治. 3组常用鱼类eDNA宏条形码通用引物对三亚水环境样品的物种检出效果比较. 南方水产科学. 2025(01): 66-76 . 本站查看
    2. 薛向平,孙朝徽,刘霞,惠筠,李学军,李秀启,司飞. 基于COI基因的黄河河南-山东段鲤群体遗传结构分析. 淡水渔业. 2025(02): 43-52 .
    3. 朱书礼,陈蔚涛,武智,夏雨果,杨计平,李跃飞,李捷. 基于环境DNA技术的珠江中下游鱼类多样性初步研究. 南方水产科学. 2024(01): 120-129 . 本站查看
    4. 于耀鲜,邢冉冉,邓婷婷,王琳,卢思远,王宏勋,王丽梅,陈颖. 基于重组酶介导等温扩增-CRISPR/Cas12a的青鱼物种快速鉴定研究. 食品安全质量检测学报. 2024(04): 40-48 .
    5. 徐颖琪,梁绪虹,陈新军,宋成辉,彭祖焜,王丛丛. 基于COⅠ基因构建西北太平洋常见鱼类DNA条形码参考数据库. 上海海洋大学学报. 2024(04): 823-835 .
    6. 张浩博,王晓艳,陈治,钟兰萍,高天翔. 基于环境DNA metabarcoding的舟山及其邻近海域鱼类空间分布格局的初步研究. 水产学报. 2024(08): 125-138 .
    7. 李筱芹,吴开阳,倪达富,杨丽亚,鲁桃秀,张连博,邓华堂,吴彤飞,何荣超,付梅,姚维志,吕红健. 基于环境DNA技术的梯级水坝对长江上游重要支流鱼类多样性的影响研究——以綦江为例. 生态学报. 2024(19): 8865-8883 .
    8. 陈炳耀,信誉,路方婷,孙婧,刘杉,李敏,吴斌,王崇瑞,张衡,周玉香,白玲. 长江江豚监测现状及展望. 中国环境监测. 2023(02): 1-10 .
    9. 陈治,蔡杏伟,申志新,张清凤,李芳远,谷圆,李高俊,赵光军,王镇江. 海南岛淡水鱼类eDNA宏条形码COⅠ通用引物的筛选. 渔业科学进展. 2023(06): 40-57 .
    10. 刘乙蒙,刘洋,刘必林,俞晔伟,宋成辉,王丛丛. Cyt b和12S rRNA基因条形码在灯笼鱼科鱼类物种鉴定中的应用. 中国水产科学. 2023(09): 1112-1126 .
    11. 蒋佩文,李敏,张帅,陈作志,徐姗楠. 基于环境DNA宏条码和底拖网的珠江河口鱼类多样性. 水生生物学报. 2022(11): 1701-1711 .

    Other cited types(5)

Catalog

    Article views (1073) PDF downloads (75) Cited by(16)
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return