Volume 14 Issue 4
Jul.  2018
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Abstract
References
Related Articles
CHEN Shuyin, ZHANG Zhiyong, XU Jin, JI Hongjiu, WU Guojun, JIA Chaofeng, ZHU Fei, MENG Qian. Study on larval early development and point of no return of hybrid F2 of Acanthopagrus schiegelii (♀)×Pagrus major (♂)[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2018, 14(4): 122-128. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-0780.2018.04.015
Citation: CHEN Shuyin, ZHANG Zhiyong, XU Jin, JI Hongjiu, WU Guojun, JIA Chaofeng, ZHU Fei, MENG Qian. Study on larval early development and point of no return of hybrid F2 of Acanthopagrus schiegelii (♀)×Pagrus major (♂)[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2018, 14(4): 122-128. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-0780.2018.04.015
shu

Study on larval early development and point of no return of hybrid F2 of Acanthopagrus schiegelii (♀)×Pagrus major (♂)

  • 1.

    Marine Fisheries Research Institute of Jiangsu Province, Nantong 226007, China

  • 2.

    Jiangsu Key Laboratory for Genetics and Breeding of Marine Fishes, Nantong 226007, China

More Information
  • Received Date: August 10, 2017
  • Revised Date: March 18, 2018
  • Available Online: December 04, 2018
    Graphical Abstract
    • Abstract
  • With the hybrid F1 [Acanthopagrus schiegelii (♀) ×Pagrus major (♂)] as parents, we analyzed the early development and point of no return (PNR) of hybrid F2 which were naturally fertilized and artificially incubated at the water temperature of (21.8±0.4) ℃ in April, 2017. The results show that the total length of the newly hatched larva was (2.40±0.15) mm, and the larva started feeding at 3 dah with the mixed feeding stage lasting 4−5 d. The yolk sac disappeared at 7 dah and the total length was (3.95±0.04) mm. The initial feeding rate and the highest feeding rate were 45.80% and 77.21%, respectively. The initial feeding rate dropped significantly to 29.83% at 6 dah and the PNR appeared. In the starvation group, the larvae experienced negative growth and had significant difference at 5 dah (P<0.05) and very significant difference at 5 dah (P<0.01) in the total length with the control group. It is indicated that the development of hybrid F2 larvae was good, and the optimum initial feeding time for the larvae was within 3 d after their mouths opened.
    • FullText(HTML)
    • References (35)
  • [1]
    江世贵, 苏天凤, 夏军红, 等. 中国近海鲷科鱼类种质资源及其利用[M]. 北京: 海洋出版社, 2012: 1-55.
    [2]
    吴仁协, 刘静, 樊冀蓉, 等. 黑棘鲷的命名和分类地位探究[J]. 海洋科学, 2011, 35(5): 117-119.
    [3]
    YANG Y X, CAO X X, FENG R Y, et al. Isolation and characterization of thirteen polymorphic microsatellite loci from black porgy (Acanthopagrus schlegeli)[J]. J Genet, 2015, 94(1): E97-E99.
    [4]
    KINOSHITA I, TANAKA M. Differentiated spatial distribution of larvae and juveniles of the two sparids, red and black sea bream, in Shijiki Bay[J]. 日本水産学会誌, 1990, 56(11): 1807-1813.
    [5]
    JEAN C T, LEE S C, HUI C F, et al. Genetic variation of black porgy, Acanthopagrus schlegeli (Perciformes: Sparidae) in the coastal waters of Taiwan[J]. Biochem Syst Ecol, 1996, 24(3): 211-219.
    [6]
    ZHU F, ZHANG Z, CHEN S, et al. The complete mitochondrial genome of the hybrid of Pagrus major (♀) × Acanthopagrus schlegelii (♂)[J]. Mitochondrial DNA A, 2016, 27(4): 2980-2981.
    [7]
    林勉, 苗亮, 李明云, 等. 真鲷、黑鲷及其杂交子代的染色体构成与 AFLP 分析[J]. 海洋学报(中文版), 2014, 36(8): 117-121.
    [8]
    PARK I S, KIM B S, LEE S J. Comparative of morphometric traits of hybrids between Red Sea bream (Pagrus major) and the Black Sea bream (Acanthopagrus schlegelii)[J]. J Fish Sci Techol, 2006, 9(1): 44-47.
    [9]
    王思婷, 李鹏, 陈淑吟, 等. 黑鲷与真鲷及其杂交子一代脂肪含量测定与脂肪酸成分分析[J]. 食品科学, 2016, 37(20): 81-85.
    [10]
    姜景腾. 真鲷♀×黑鲷♂杂交子一代抗逆性初步研究[D]. 宁波: 宁波大学, 2011: 21-43.
    [11]
    殷名称. 鱼类早期生活史研究与其进展[J]. 水产学报, 1991, 15(4): 348-358.
    [12]
    殷名称. 鱼类仔鱼期的摄食和生长[J]. 水产学报, 1995, 19(4): 335-342.
    [13]
    SHAN X J, HUANG W, CAO L, et al. Advances in studies of the effects of starvation on growth and development of fish larvae[J]. J Ocean Univ China, 2008, 7(3): 319-326.
    [14]
    菅玉霞, 房慧, 张少春, 等. 大泷六线鱼仔鱼饥饿试验及不可逆点的研究[J]. 海洋科学, 2014, 38(3): 111-115.
    [15]
    贾瑞锦, 陈超, 孔祥迪, 等. 饥饿对条纹锯鮨仔鱼的存活、摄食及生长的影响[J]. 海洋科学, 2014, 38(4): 44-49.
    [16]
    李彩娟, 许郑超, 张振早, 等. 赤眼鳟仔鱼饥饿试验和不可逆点研究[J]. 扬州大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2016, 37(3): 65-70.
    [17]
    鲍宝龙, 苏锦祥, 殷名称. 延迟投饵对真鲷、牙鲆仔鱼早期阶段摄食、存活及生长的影响[J]. 水产学报, 1998, 22(1): 33-38.
    [18]
    陈国柱, 方展强. 饥饿对唐鱼仔鱼摄食和生长的影响[J]. 动物学杂志, 2007, 42(5): 49-61.
    [19]
    许晓娟, 区又君, 李加儿. 延迟投饵对卵形鲳鲹早期仔鱼阶段摄食、成活及生长的影响[J]. 南方水产, 2010, 6(1): 37-41.
    [20]
    夏连军, 施兆鸿, 陆建学. 黄鲷仔鱼饥饿试验及不可逆点的确定[J]. 海洋渔业, 2004, 26(4): 286-290.
    [21]
    彭志兰, 柳敏海, 罗海忠, 等. 条石鲷仔鱼饥饿试验及不可逆点的确定[J]. 水产科学, 2010, 29(3): 152-155.
    [22]
    张海发, 刘晓春, 刘付永忠, 等. 饥饿对斜带石斑鱼卵黄囊期仔鱼摄食、存活及生长的影响[J]. 中山大学学报(自然科学版), 2009, 48(1): 51-55.
    [23]
    彭志兰, 柳敏海, 傅荣兵, 等. 早繁鮸鱼仔鱼饥饿试验及不可逆点的确定[J]. 海洋渔业, 2007, 29(4): 325-330.
    [24]
    王茂元. 斑鳜仔鱼饥饿试验及不可逆点的确定[J]. 广东海洋大学学报, 2015, 35(4): 99-103.
    [25]
    黄良敏, 谢仰杰, 邓书品, 等. 延迟投饵对花尾胡椒鲷仔鱼摄食、生长和存活的影响[J]. 集美大学学报(自然科学版), 2003, 8(2): 130-133.
    [26]
    马建波, 茅沈丽, 梁桂洪, 等. 杂交鳢仔鱼饥饿试验及不可逆点的确定[J]. 水生态学杂志, 2012, 33(3): 90-95.
    [27]
    鲍宝龙, 苏锦祥, 龚小玲. 饥饿状态下真鲷仔鱼早期阶段的高温、低盐耐力和浮力[J]. 上海海洋大学学报, 1997, 6(2): 90-95.
    [28]
    高小强, 洪磊, 刘志峰, 等. 美洲西鲱仔鱼不可逆点及仔、稚鱼摄食特性研究[J]. 水产学报, 2015, 39(3): 392-400.
    [29]
    柳琪, 区又君. 鱼类早期发育阶段摄食行为研究现状[J]. 南方水产, 2006, 2(1): 71-75.
    [30]
    ŠIMKOVA A, VOJTEK L, HALACKA K, et al. The effect of hybridization on fish physiology, immunity and blood biochemistry: a case study in hybridizing Cyprinus carpio and Carassius gibelio (Cyprinidae)[J]. Aquaculture, 2015, 435: 381-389.
    [31]
    FALK-PETERSEN I B. Comparative organ differentiation during early life stages of marine fish[J]. Fish Shellfish Immunol, 2005, 19(5): 397-412.
    [32]
    MAZURAIS D, DARIAS M, ZAMBONINOINO-INFANTE J L, et al. Transcriptomics for understanding marine fish larval development[J]. Can J Zool, 2011, 89(7): 599-611.
    [33]
    DOU S Z, MASUDA R, TANAKA M, et al. Effects of temperature and delayed initial feeding on the survival and growth of Japanese flounder larvae[J]. J Fish Biol, 2005, 66(2): 362-377.
    [34]
    李艳秋, 姜志强, 孙阳, 等. 太平洋鳕仔鱼饥饿实验及不可逆生长点的确定[J]. 生态学报, 2014, 34(14): 3873-3878.
    [35]
    邹记兴, 向文洲, 胡超群, 等. 点带石斑鱼仔鱼营养转换期的摄食与生长[J]. 高技术通讯, 2003, 13(5): 87-91, 86.
    • Related Articles

  • Related Articles

    [1]LI Xue, LI Yafang, CHEN Qinghua, NING Jiajia, WANG Lianggen, XU Lei, HUANG Delian, LIU Shuangshuang, ZHONG Chao, ZHANG Jian, WANG Xuehui, DU Feiyan. Structural characteristics and relative influencing factors of macrobenthos community in intertidal zone of Daya Bay[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2023, 19(3): 42-50. DOI: 10.12131/20220202
    [2]WANG Teng, LIU Yong, QUAN Qiumei, LIN Lin, XIAO Yayuan, LI Chunhou, LI Hong. Community structure characteristics of zooplankton in main freshwater rivers of Jiangmen City, Guangdong Province[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2021, 17(4): 9-17. DOI: 10.12131/20210019
    [3]CHEN Zilin, LI Chunhou, XIAO Yayuan, LIU Yong, LIN Lin, WANG Jiujiang, QUAN Qiumei. Distribution of structure of macrobenthic communities in coastal waters of Jiangmen, Guangdong[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2020, 16(4): 18-27. DOI: 10.12131/20190248
    [4]GONG Yuyan, XIAO Yayuan, XU Shannan, LIU Yong, YANG Yutao, HUANG Zirong, LI Chunhou. Zooplankton community structure in Hailing Bay and its relationship with primary environmental factors[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2019, 15(6): 49-55. DOI: 10.12131/20180220
    [5]WANG Lianggen, LI Yafang, DU Feiyan, NING Jiajia, XU Lei, XIAO Yayuan, LI Chunhou. Zooplankton community characteristics and impact on ichthyoplankton in artificial reefs and island reefs of Daya Bay[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2018, 14(2): 41-50. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-0780.2018.02.006
    [6]LÜ Shaoliang, WANG Xuefeng, ZENG Jiawei, CHEN Haigang, WANG Lifei, JIA Xiaoping. Phytoplankton community structure and its environmental adaptation in Fangcheng coastal waters[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2017, 13(4): 17-25. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-0780.2017.04.003
    [7]DENG Bangping, XU Ren, LIU Caicai, CAI Peng, YE Shufeng. Distribution characteristics of zooplankton communities in offshore waters of the Southern Yellow Sea and the East China Sea in summer[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2015, 11(4): 11-19. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-0780.2015.04.002
    [8]HU Chengye, XU Heng, SHUI Bonian, HAN Zhiqiang, DU Xiao, WANG Fengli, ZHENG Wei, LI Liang. Community structure and biodiversity of nekton near Oufei Beach of Wenzhou[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2015, 11(3): 7-15. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-0780.2015.03.002
    [9]DENG Bangping, CHEN Dong, JI Huanhong, WANG Jinhui, XU Ren. Ecological response of zooplankton community to tidal movement in Fengxian coastal area in autumn[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2011, 7(1): 69-72. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-0780.2011.01.011
    [10]GAO Yuan, LAI Zini, WANG Chao, PANG Shixun, WEI Taili, XIE Wenping, YANG Wanling. Community characteristics of zooplankton in Pearl River Estuary in summer of 2006[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2008, 4(1): 10-15.

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(30)

    1. 初建松，郑卫东，孙利元，彭道民，索安宁，朱玉贵. 基于生物资源的万山海洋牧场生境适宜性评估. 海洋科学. 2024(01): 75-84 .
    2. 田思泉，柳晓雪，花传祥，王寅，杜涣洋. 南海渔业资源状况及其管理挑战. 上海海洋大学学报. 2024(03): 786-798 .
    3. 李炳楠，胡梓阳，董建宇，吕少梁，陈宁，初庆柱，王学锋. 海南东部海域甲壳类群落结构特征及其环境影响因子. 广东海洋大学学报. 2024(06): 50-58 .
    4. 蔡研聪，孙铭帅，许友伟，陈作志. 南海北部近海中国枪乌贼分布与海洋环境关系的空间异质研究. 南方水产科学. 2023(03): 1-10 . 本站查看
    5. 刘锴，马嘉昕. 中国海洋渔业碳汇的时空演变及发展态势. 资源开发与市场. 2023(07): 778-785 .
    6. 刘彩莲，许庆，王林龙，邢衍阔，宋稼豪，林柏岸，康斌，刘敏. 闽东近海春秋季游泳动物多样性、密度及群落特征. 生物多样性. 2023(07): 115-131 .
    7. 粟丽，许友伟，张魁，陈作志. 南海区拖网渔业发展趋势及其对渔业资源的影响. 南方水产科学. 2023(04): 41-48 . 本站查看
    8. 冯瑞玉，郭禹，李金明，孙金辉，于刚，吴一桂，秦传新. 基于EnhanceFish模型的鱼类增殖放流策略研究:以中山市南朗水域黄鳍棘鲷增殖放流为例. 渔业科学进展. 2023(05): 1-10 .
    9. 罗峥力，杨长平，王良明，刘岩，单斌斌，刘蔓婷，孙典荣. 北部湾北部沿岸海域鱼类资源时空分布特征及多样性变化. 南方农业学报. 2023(06): 1847-1857 .
    10. 裴精花，陈清华，范金金，刘伟杰，郭照良，隋昊志. 珠江口海域游泳动物群落结构及多样性特征. 南方农业学报. 2023(12): 3727-3738 .
    11. 麦广铭，陈志劼，王学锋，肖雅元，李纯厚. 南海北部沿岸鱼类分类学多样性的空间格局. 南方水产科学. 2022(03): 38-47 . 本站查看
    12. 潘士远，林坤，吕少梁，王学锋. 种间互作对雷州湾海域鱼类群落结构的影响. 生态学报. 2022(22): 9383-9393 .
    13. 周卫国，丁德文，索安宁，何伟宏，田涛. 珠江口海洋牧场渔业资源关键功能群的遴选方法. 水产学报. 2021(03): 433-443 .
    14. 刘前，王学锋，吕少梁，林坤，张静. 湛江港海域游泳动物群落结构及多样性分析. 广东海洋大学学报. 2021(02): 103-110 .
    15. 张羽翔，刘维，赵海龙，吴程宏，陈敏. 海南岛近岸春秋季游泳动物多样性分析. 渔业研究. 2021(02): 133-142 .
    16. 徐鹏，谢木娇，周卫国，孙英婷，丁德文，索安宁. 近30年珠江口海域游泳动物经济物种群落结构变化特征. 应用海洋学学报. 2021(02): 239-250 .
    17. 易晓英，邱康文，周霄，招春旭，邓裕坚，何雄波，颜云榕. 北部湾斑鳍白姑鱼渔业生物学分析. 上海海洋大学学报. 2021(03): 515-524 .
    18. 陆丽仪，曾嘉维，林坤，张静，王学锋. 海南东部外海海域鱼类群落结构季节变动及其影响因素. 广东海洋大学学报. 2021(03): 28-35 .
    19. 于杰，周艳波，唐振朝，陈国宝，曾雷. 基于北斗卫星船位监控系统数据的南海双拖渔船作业特征研究. 海洋科学. 2021(10): 40-48 .
    20. 余文全. 南海渔业冲突的不同情境与政策选择. 东南亚研究. 2021(04): 106-123+154 .
    21. 李敏，孔啸兰，许友伟，陈作志. 基于线粒体控制区序列的花斑蛇鲻遗传多态性分析. 热带海洋学报. 2020(04): 42-49 .
    22. 于南京，俞存根，菅康康，许永久，孙蓓蓓，张佩怡，刘坤，王慧君. 嵊泗列岛邻近海域鱼类种类组成及多样性分析. 渔业研究. 2020(04): 293-301 .
    23. 蔡研聪，孙铭帅，许友伟，李佳俊，黄梓荣，陈作志，杨长平，刘维达，张衡. 南海北部近海头足类优势种及其生态位特征. 应用生态学报. 2020(08): 2793-2803 .
    24. 彭露，徐姗楠，蔡研聪，许友伟，孙铭帅，陈作志，张魁，粟丽. 北部湾金线鱼的数量分布及变化趋势. 海洋湖沼通报. 2020(04): 120-126 .
    25. 蔡研聪，黄梓荣，李佳俊，许友伟，孙铭帅，陈作志，刘维达. 南海北部近海新记录种——苏门答腊金线鱼资源分布特征. 南方水产科学. 2020(06): 1-11 . 本站查看
    26. 曾嘉维，林坤，王学锋，李纯厚. 雷州湾附近海域鱼类群落结构及其与环境因子的关系. 中国水产科学. 2019(01): 108-117 .
    27. 刘祝楠，余景，陈丕茂，于杰，王言丰. 粤西海域灯光罩网渔场时空分布与海洋环境的关系. 南方农业学报. 2019(04): 867-874 .
    28. 蔡研聪，黄梓荣，许友伟，孙铭帅，徐姗楠，张魁，陈作志. 南海北部近海渔业资源密度概率分布特征. 应用生态学报. 2019(07): 2426-2436 .
    29. 王言丰，余景，陈丕茂，于杰，刘祝楠. 北部湾灯光罩网渔场时空分布与海洋环境关系分析. 热带海洋学报. 2019(05): 68-76 .
    30. Liu Zhunan，Yu Jing. Response of Spatio-temporal Distribution of Fishery Resources to Mairne Environment in the Northern South China Sea. Animal Husbandry and Feed Science. 2018(Z1): 311-317+320 .

    Other cited types(16)

Catalog

    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML
    Article views (3379) PDF downloads (230) Cited by(46)
    Related

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co., Ltd.  

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return