JIANG Tao, ZHENG Chaocheng, HUANG Honghui, XUAN Zhongya, QIU Chen, LIU Hongbo, YANG Jian. Landmark-based morphometric comparison of otolith for Coilia mystus and C. grayii from Pearl River estuary and Jiulong River estuary[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2018, 14(6): 10-16. DOI: 10.12131/20180097
Citation: JIANG Tao, ZHENG Chaocheng, HUANG Honghui, XUAN Zhongya, QIU Chen, LIU Hongbo, YANG Jian. Landmark-based morphometric comparison of otolith for Coilia mystus and C. grayii from Pearl River estuary and Jiulong River estuary[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2018, 14(6): 10-16. DOI: 10.12131/20180097

Landmark-based morphometric comparison of otolith for Coilia mystus and C. grayii from Pearl River estuary and Jiulong River estuary

More Information
  • Received Date: May 10, 2018
  • Revised Date: June 28, 2018
  • Accepted Date: July 18, 2018
  • Available Online: December 05, 2018
  • Landmark-based morphometric analysis was first used to identify the variation in the otolith and stock connectivity of Coilia mystus and C. grayii from the Pearl River estuary and Jiulong River estuary. Six landmarks in the outline of otolith and four landmarks in the sulcus were selected to extract the geometric morphometric information of otoliths. Discrimination analysis indicates that both intra-and inter-species distinguishing ratios of the two Coilia fish from two different waters were 100%. Among the 10 landmarks, those in the sulcus had main contribution (76.1%) in explaining the main source of morphological variation, while those in the outline of otolith just had 23.9%. The difference of inter-species shows that the sulcus of C. mystus was wider than C. grayii. Meanwhile, the difference of intra species shows that the C. grayii from the Pearl River estuary, had a narrower sulcus than those from the Jiulong River estuary, but the two stocks of C. mystus from these two waters were the opposite. It is revealed that the investigated stocks of either C. mystus or C. grayii from the Pearl River estuary and Jiulong River estuary are separated, which means that they may belong to different geographical stocks.
  • [1]
    方华华, 董晓煜, 李翔, 等. 2种耳石分析法在3种鲽科鱼类中的应用[J]. 海洋湖沼通报, 2017(3): 98-105.
    [2]
    ZHANG C, FAN Y N, YE Z J, et al. Identification of five Pampus species from the coast of China based on sagittal otolith morphology analysis[J]. Acta Oceanologica Sinica, 2017, 36(2): 51-56.
    [3]
    张波, 戴芳群, 金显仕. 黄海重要饵料鱼种矢耳石的形态特征[J]. 中国水产科学, 2008, 15(6): 917-926.
    [4]
    麻秋云, 薛莹, 徐宾铎, 等. 胶州湾12种饵料鱼类耳石大小与体长的关系[J]. 水生生物学报, 2013, 37(3): 481-487.
    [5]
    REBAYA M, BEN FALEH A, ALLAYA H, et al. Otolith shape discrimination of Liza ramada (Actinopterygii: Mugiliformes: Mugilidae) from marine and estuarine populations in Tunisia[J]. Acta Ichthyologica et Piscatoria, 2017, 47(1): 13-21.
    [6]
    DUNCAN R, BROPHY D, ARRIZABALAGA H. Otolith shape analysis as a tool for stock separation of albacore tuna feeding in the Northeast Atlantic[J]. Fish Res, 2018, 200: 68-74.
    [7]
    PONTON D. Is geometric morphometrics efficient for comparing otolith shape of different fish species?[J]. J Morphol, 2006, 267(6): 750-757.
    [8]
    REICHENBACHER B, FEULNER G R, SCHULZ-MIRBACH T. Geographic variation in otolith morphology among freshwater populations of Aphanius dispar (Teleostei, Cyprinodontiformes) from the southeastern Arabian Peninsula[J]. J Morphol, 2009, 270(4): 469-484.
    [9]
    王岩, 陈作志, 张俊, 等. 南海北部陆坡海域粗鳞灯笼鱼耳石形态特征[J]. 南方水产科学, 2017, 13(6): 65-72.
    [10]
    BOSE A, ADRAGNA J B, BALSHINE S. Otolith morphology varies between populations, sexes and male alternative reproductive tactics in a vocal toadfish Porichthys notatus[J]. J Fish Biol, 2017, 90(1): 311-325.
    [11]
    MAPP J, HUNTER E, van der KOOIJ J, et al. Otolith shape and size: the importance of age when determining indices for fish-stock separation[J]. Fish Res, 2017, 190: 43-52.
    [12]
    魏联, 朱国平, 刘子俊. 基于形态学及傅里叶分析对两种南极冰鱼耳石外型的研究[J]. 极地研究, 2017, 29(2): 218-227.
    [13]
    VIGNON M. Ontogenetic trajectories of otolith shape during shift in habitat use: interaction between otolith growth and environment[J]. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol, 2012, s420/421(2): 26-32.
    [14]
    侯刚, 刘丹丹, 冯波, 等. 基于地标点几何形态测量法识别北部湾4种白姑鱼矢耳石形态[J]. 中国水产科学, 2013, 20(6): 1293-1302.
    [15]
    IBANEZ A L, HERNANDEZ-FRAGA K, ALVAREZ-HERNANDEZ S. Discrimination analysis of phenotypic stocks comparing fish otolith and scale shapes[J]. Fish Res, 2017, 185: 6-13.
    [16]
    MONTEIRO L, BENEDITTO A, GUILLERMO L, et al. Allometric changes and shape differentiation of sagitta otoliths in sciaenid fishes[J]. Fish Res, 2005, 74(1/2/3): 288-299.
    [17]
    郑朝臣, 姜涛, 骆仁军, 等. 不同产地中华绒螯蟹形态差异的地标点法分析[J]. 水产学报, 2017, 41(12): 1896-1907.
    [18]
    陈模舜, 金则新, 柯世省. 不同光环境下天台鹅耳枥叶形变化的测定与分析[J]. 林业科学, 2018, 54(1): 54-63.
    [19]
    LOMBARTE A, PALMER M, MATALLANAS J A, et al. Ecomorphological trends and phylogenetic inertia of otolith sagittae in Nototheniidae[J]. Environ Biol Fish, 2010, 89(3/4): 607-618.
    [20]
    MONDAL R, DEVI N P, JAUHARI R K. Landmark-based geometric morphometric analysis of wing shape among certain species of Aedes mosquitoes in District Dehradun (Uttarakhand), India[J]. J Vector Borne Dis, 2015, 52(2): 122-128.
    [21]
    孙超. 几种鲚属的鱼类分子遗传特征研究[D]. 南京: 南京农业大学, 2012: 53-54.
    [22]
    张楠. 鲚属鱼类和江鳕的线粒体基因组全序列研究[D]. 青岛: 中国海洋大学, 2015: 47-51.
    [23]
    YANG J, ARAI T, LIU H, et al. Reconstructing habitat use of Coilia mystus and Coilia ectenes of the Yangtze River estuary, and of Coilia ectenes of Taihu Lake, based on otolith strontium and calcium[J]. J Fish Biol, 2006, 69(4): 1120-1135.
    [24]
    姜涛, 刘洪波, 黄洪辉, 等. 珠江口七丝鲚耳石微化学初报[J]. 水生生物学报, 2015, 39(4): 816-821.
    [25]
    MCDOWALL R M. Diadromy, diversity and divergence: implications for speciation processes in fishes[J]. Fish Fish, 2001, 2(3): 278-285.
    [26]
    JIANG T, YANG J, LU M, et al. Discovery of a spawning area for anadromous Coilia nasus Temminck et Schlegel, 1846 in Poyang Lake, China[J]. J Appl Ichthyol, 2017, 33(2): 189-192.
    [27]
    JIANG T, LIU H B, SHEN X Q, et al. Life history variations among different populations of Coilia nasus along the Chinese coast inferred from otolith microchemistry[J]. J Fac Agr Kyushu Univ, 2014, 59(2): 383-389.
    [28]
    姜涛, 杨健, 刘洪波, 等. 刀鲚、凤鲚和湖鲚矢耳石的形态学比较研究[J]. 海洋科学, 2011, 35(3): 23-31.
    [29]
    姜涛. 基于耳石形态和微化学特征的我国鲚属鱼类洄游生态学研究[D]. 南京: 南京农业大学, 2014: 29-42.
    [30]
    COWEN R K, LWIZA K M, SPONAUGLE S, et al. Connectivity of marine populations: open or closed?[J]. Science, 2000, 287(5454): 857-859.
    [31]
    ALMANY G R, CONNOLLY S R, HEATH D D, et al. Connectivity, biodiversity conservation and the design of marine reserve networks for coral reefs[J]. Coral Reefs, 2009, 28(2): 339-351.
    [32]
    HUGHES J M, SCHMIDT D J, MACDONALD J I, et al. Low interbasin connectivity in a facultatively diadromous fish: evidence from genetics and otolith chemistry[J]. Mol Ecol, 2014, 23(5): 1000-1013.
    [33]
    THORROLD S, LATKOCZY C, SWART P, et al. Natal homing in a marine fish metapopulation[J]. Science, 2001, 291(5502): 297-299.
    [34]
    SVANBACK R, EKLOV P. Genetic variation and phenotypic plasticity: causes of morphological and dietary variation in Eurasian perch[J]. Evol Ecol Res, 2006, 8(1): 37-49.
    [35]
    杨文斌, 苏彦平, 刘洪波, 等. 长江水系3个湖泊中华绒螯蟹形态及元素“指纹”特征[J]. 中国水产科学, 2012, 19(1): 84-93.
    [36]
    杨健, 邱楚雯, 苏彦平, 等. 不同水域条件下中华绒螯蟹的形态和元素分布[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2013, 41(3): 187-191.
    [37]
    MONTANINI S, STAGIONI M, VALDRE G A, et al. Intra-specific and inter-specific variability of the sulcus acusticus of sagittal otoliths in two gurnard species (Scorpaeniformes, Triglidae)[J]. Fish Res, 2015, 161: 93-101.
    [38]
    周晓犊, 杨金权, 唐文乔, 等. 基于线粒体CO Ⅰ基因DNA条形码的中国鲚属物种有效性分析[J]. 动物分类学报, 2010, 35(4): 819-826.
    [39]
    程起群, 马春艳, 庄平, 等. 基于线粒体cyt b基因标记探讨凤鲚3群体遗传结构和进化特征[J]. 水产学报, 2008, 32(1): 1-7.

Catalog

    Article views (4196) PDF downloads (63) Cited by()
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return