Volume 19 Issue 6
Dec.  2023
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Abstract
References
Related Articles
YANG Ling, LIU Yiming, XU Bingjie, WANG Chaoqi, WU Tao, XING Qinggan, PEI Kun, WEI Chaomin, ZENG Shangwei, PAN Ying. Nursery and adult culture experiments of Tapes dorsatus in Beihai, Fangchenggang and Qinzhou sea areas[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2023, 19(6): 38-50. DOI: 10.12131/20230145
Citation: YANG Ling, LIU Yiming, XU Bingjie, WANG Chaoqi, WU Tao, XING Qinggan, PEI Kun, WEI Chaomin, ZENG Shangwei, PAN Ying. Nursery and adult culture experiments of Tapes dorsatus in Beihai, Fangchenggang and Qinzhou sea areas[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2023, 19(6): 38-50. DOI: 10.12131/20230145
shu

Nursery and adult culture experiments of Tapes dorsatus in Beihai, Fangchenggang and Qinzhou sea areas

  • 1.

    College of Animal Science and Technology, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China

  • 2.

    Key Laboratory of Aquatic Healthy Breeding and Nutrition Regulation of Guangxi Universities, Nanning 530004, China

  • 3.

    Fangchenggang Fishery Technology Promotion Station, Fangchenggang 538021, China

More Information
  • Received Date: July 30, 2023
  • Revised Date: August 11, 2023
  • Accepted Date: August 30, 2023
  • Available Online: September 02, 2023
    Graphical Abstract
    • Abstract

  • In order to explore the suitable breeding density and effective culture mode of Tapes dorsatus in three sea areas of Beibu Gulf, Guangxi, we had carried out basket nursery culture, basket adult culture and net cage hanging experiments of T. dorsatus in mudflat of three sea areas in Qingzhou, Beihai and Fangchenggang from May 2021 to January 2023. The results show that: 1) The suitable nursery culture density for T. dorsatus were 2 000, 1 500 and 1 500 grains·basket−1, respectively, and the growth indexes and survival rate of T. dorsatus decreased with the increase of nursery culture density. The survival rates of all density groups in Beihai were significantly better than those in Fangchenggang and Qinzhou (P<0.05). Except that the growth indexes (Shell length, shell width and body mass) in d5 group (3 000 grains·basket−1) in Beihai were lower than that in Fangchenggang, the growth indexes of other groups were all higher than those of Fangchenggang and Qinzhou. 2) The suitable culture densities of T. dorsatus in Beihai, Fangchenggang and Qinzhou were 40, 40 and 20 grains·basket−1, respectively. The growth indexes and survival rate of T. dorsatus at adult stage were Beihai>Fangchenggang>Qinzhou, and the survival rate decreased with the increase of cultivation density. When the density of net cage suspension in Fangchenggang was 30 grains· cage−1, all growth indexes were the highest. There were no significant differences in shell length, shell width, shell height, body mass and survival rate among different density groups in net cage suspension (P>0.05). The results of environmental factors show that the water temperature, beach temperature, salinity, transparency, pH and DO in Beihai were slightly higher than those in Fangchenggang and Qinzhou, with relatively stable water quality. The water quality environment in Qinzhou and Fangchenggang changed greatly and was unstable. The diameter of plasmid at the bottom of Beihai mudflat was mainly coarse sand (49.00%), Fangchenggang was mainly composed of medium sand (59.28%), and Qinzhou was mainly composed of fine sand (77.33%). The results of phytoplankton quantity show that the species and quantity of phytoplankton algae in Beihai were the largest, and the least species and quantity of phytoplankton algae were in Qinzhou. The research indicates that T. dorsatus is suitable for nursery and adult culture in three sea areas of Beibu Gulf, and the breeding effect in Beihai is better than that in Fangchenggang and Qinzhou. Besides, 1.5-year-old T. dorsatus is suitable for net cage hanging culture in Fangchenggang sea area.

    • FullText(HTML)
    • References (35)
  • [1]
    庄启谦. 中国动物志 软体动物门 双壳纲 帘蛤科[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2001, 63-64.
    [2]
    黄洋, 杜涛, 杨世平. 钝缀锦蛤生态习性的初步研究[J]. 水产科学, 2008, 27(4): 175-178. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-1111.2008.04.004
    [3]
    杨家林, 邹杰, 彭慧婧. 温度、盐度和体质量对钝缀锦蛤滤食率和同化率的影响[J]. 水产科学, 2019, 38(1): 104-108. doi: 10.16378/j.cnki.1003-1111.2019.01.016
    [4]
    巫旗生, 祁剑飞, 宁岳, 等. 盐度、pH、氨氮对钝缀锦蛤稚贝生长及存活的影响[J]. 渔业研究, 2021, 43(6): 621-627.
    [5]
    张柯馨, 曹楚畑, 刘志刚, 等. 钝缀锦蛤 (Tapes dorsatus) 稚贝的温度和盐度耐受性研究[J]. 海洋学报, 2022, 44(4): 57-64.
    [6]
    NELL J A. Salinity studies on the clams Katelysia rhytiphora (Lamy) and Tapes dorsatus (Lamarck)[J]. Aquac Res, 1997, 28(2): 115-119. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2109.1997.tb01023.x
    [7]
    陈道海, 李洪英, 吴秋颖, 等. 10种帘蛤科贝类COI基因序列分析及系统发育研究[J]. 生物资源, 2018, 40(3): 277-284.
    [8]
    巫旗生, 曾志南, 宁岳, 等. 钝缀锦蛤形态性状对活体质量的影响[J]. 水产科学, 2018, 37(1): 110-114. doi: 10.16378/j.cnki.1003-1111.2018.01.017
    [9]
    巫旗生, 文宇, 曾志南, 等. 钝缀锦蛤繁殖周期和胚胎发育[J]. 中国水产科学, 2017, 24(3): 488-496.
    [10]
    连昌朋, 王超奇, 杨凌, 等. 广西北部湾钝缀锦蛤精巢发育、精子发生及超微结构研究[J]. 海洋科学, 2022, 46(6): 80-89.
    [11]
    连昌朋, 吴韬, 王超奇, 等. 广西北海营盘海域钝缀锦蛤(Tapes conspersus)卵巢发育、卵子和卵黄发生的研究[J]. 热带海洋学报, 2022, 41(5): 170-179. doi: 10.11978/2021185
    [12]
    张柯馨, 杨尚松, 罗泽鑫, 等. 钝缀锦蛤胚胎、幼虫及稚贝发育观察[J]. 水产科学, 2023, 42(4): 682-689. doi: 10.16378/j.cnki.1003-1111.21125
    [13]
    NELL J A, O'CONNOR W A, HAND R E, et al. Hatchery production of diploid and triploid clams, Tapes dorsatus (Lamarck 1818): a potential new species for aquaculture[J]. Aquaculture, 1995, 130(4): 389-394. doi: 10.1016/0044-8486(95)92761-Q
    [14]
    张柯馨, 罗泽鑫, 张元, 等. 钝缀锦蛤规模化人工育苗技术研究[J]. 南方水产科学, 2023, 19(3): 51-59. doi: 10.12131/20220262
    [15]
    PATERSON K J, NELL J A. Effect of different growing techniques and substrate types on the growth and survival of the clams Tapes dorsatus (Lamarck) and Katelysia rhytiphora (Lamy)[J]. Aquac Res, 1997, 28(9): 707-715. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2109.1997.tb01093.x
    [16]
    杨凌, 曾尚伟, 韦朝民, 等. 钝缀锦蛤海区中培筐式养殖及马氏珠母贝吊养养殖防风浪模式分析[J]. 渔业信息与战略, 2023, 38(1): 52-59. doi: 10.13233/j.cnki.fishis.2023.01.007
    [17]
    田园, 金燕, 陈炜, 等. 菲律宾蛤仔(Ruditapes philippinarum)“斑马蛤2号”筏式和底播养殖模式比较研究[J]. 海洋与湖沼, 2021, 52(6): 1496-1505. doi: 10.11693/hyhz20210500125
    [18]
    范斌朋, 王梅芳, 刘永, 等. 吊养和底播两种养殖方式对扁平钳蛤生长的影响[J]. 基因组学与应用生物学, 2016, 35(7): 1725-1730. doi: 10.13417/j.gab.035.001725
    [19]
    赵东波. 常用沉积物粒度分类命名方法探讨[J]. 海洋地质动态, 2009, 25(8): 41-44, 46. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-2722.2009.08.009
    [20]
    刘志刚, 刘建勇, 刘付少梅. 不同潮位、密度及季节对皱肋文蛤中间培育效果的影响[J]. 海洋科学, 2011, 35(10): 34-41.
    [21]
    李永仁, 梁健, 郭永军, 等. 天津沿海菲律宾蛤仔适养密度研究[J]. 海洋通报, 2015, 34(4): 470-474. doi: 10.11840/j.issn.1001-6392.2015.04.016
    [22]
    潘渊博, 孙秀俊, 郭贺, 等. 围隔生境下养殖密度对菲律宾蛤仔生长的影响[J]. 中国海洋大学学报(自然科学版), 2023, 53(1): 53-65. doi: 10.16441/j.cnki.hdxb.20220021
    [23]
    于佐安, 谭克非, 张明, 等. 筏式虾夷扇贝养成期不同密度生长与经济效益分析[J]. 水产学报, 2016, 40(10): 1624-1633.
    [24]
    刘德经, 张克存, 李正华. 放养密度对西施舌稚贝生长的影响[J]. 特产研究, 2008, 30(4): 14-16, 37. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4721.2008.04.004
    [25]
    何毛贤, 张红玉, 袁涛. 养殖密度、水层和养殖地点对马氏珠母贝选育群体生长存活的影响[J]. 热带海洋学报, 2009, 28(6): 68-71. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-5470.2009.06.009
    [26]
    栗志民, 刘志刚, 刘付少梅, 等. 中培期和养成期墨西哥湾扇贝(Argopecten irradians concentricus)新品系养殖密度的研究[J]. 海洋与湖沼, 2013, 44(6): 1557-1565. doi: 10.11693/hyhz20130306002
    [27]
    廖锐, 区又君, 勾效伟. 养殖密度对鱼类福利影响的研究进展I. 死亡率、生长、摄食以及应激反应[J]. 南方水产, 2006, 2(6): 76-80.
    [28]
    王超奇, 徐炳杰, 吴韬, 等. 广西北部湾滩涂施氏獭蛤中培及养成期养殖密度比较研究[J]. 南方水产科学, 2023, 19(4): 105-115. doi: 10.12131/20230046
    [29]
    蔡德建, 蒋艳, 杨家林, 等. 大獭蛤人工苗种浅海沉箱式中间培育试验研究[J]. 广西科学, 2010, 17(3): 263-266, 270. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-9164.2010.03.022
    [30]
    陈瑞芳, 刘海娟, 董兰芳, 等. 织锦巴非蛤海区悬挂养殖新模式[J]. 中国水产, 2022(7): 87-88. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-6681.2022.7.zhongguosc202207030
    [31]
    CHAUDHURI K, MANNA S, SARMA K S, et al. Physicochemical and biological factors controlling water column metabolism in Sundarbans estuary, India[J]. Aquat Biosyst, 2012, 8(1): 1-16. doi: 10.1186/2046-9063-8-1
    [32]
    李亚芳, 杜飞雁, 王亮根, 等. 底质类型对三亚湾潮间带大型底栖动物生态功能的影响[J]. 水产学报, 2018, 42(10): 1559-1571.
    [33]
    刘亦涵, 李由明, 付湘粤, 等. 基质粒径对缀锦蛤 (Taper literatus) 生长影响的分析[J]. 畜牧与饲料科学, 2018, 39(4): 15-17. doi: 10.12160/j.issn.1672-5190.2018.04.004
    [34]
    黄亚楠, 王文杰, 魏钰恒, 等. 墨西哥湾扇贝(Argopecten irradians concentricus) 选育系F7在广西北部湾海区的生长比较研究[J]. 海洋与湖沼, 2020, 51(5): 1222-1231. doi: 10.11693/hyhz20191200284
    [35]
    邱清波, 李由明, 吴丽云, 等. 干露对缀锦蛤、文蛤、美女蛤和织锦巴非蛤耗氧率的影响[J]. 海南热带海洋学院学报, 2018, 25(2): 20-24.
    • Related Articles

  • Related Articles

    [1]GONG Binhao, LIANG Qing, XUE Fei, ZOU Jianwei. Estimation on catches by Guangxi fishing vessels in Beibu Gulf[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2024, 20(6): 112-120. DOI: 10.12131/20240073
    [2]WANG Chaoqi, XU Bingjie, WU Tao, YANG Ling, LIU Yiming, PAN Ying. Comparative study on breeding density of Lutraria sieboldii in nursery culture and adult culture in Beibu Gulf beaches of Guangxi Province, China[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2023, 19(4): 105-115. DOI: 10.12131/20230046
    [3]ZHANG Gongjun, YANG Changping, LIU Yan, ZHOU Wenli, SHAN Binbin, WANG Liangming, WANG Sihan, SUN Dianrong, JIA Chunbin. Pattern of fish community and its relationship with environmental factors in Fangchenggang (Qinzhou coastal area of Beibu Gulf)[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2022, 18(4): 20-33. DOI: 10.12131/20210255
    [4]GENG Ping, ZHANG Kui, CHEN Zuozhi, XU Youwei, SUN Mingshuai. Interannual change in biological traits and exploitation rate of Decapterus maruadsi in Beibu Gulf[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2018, 14(6): 1-9. DOI: 10.12131/20180106
    [5]ZHANG Kui, CHEN Zuozhi, QIU Yongsong. Decadal changes in growth, mortality and maturity parameters of Evynnis cardinalis in Beibu Gulf[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2016, 12(6): 9-16. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-0780.2016.06.002
    [6]ZOU Jianwei, LIN Piwen, WANG Qiangzhe. Evaluation of catch in Beibu Gulf of South China Sea in 2012[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2013, 9(4): 75-81. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-0780.2013.04.013
    [7]YUAN Huarong, CHEN Pimao, JIA Xiaoping, TANG Zhenzhao, QIN Chuanxin, YU Jing, CAI Wengui, SHU Liming. Nekton resources in northeast Beibu Gulf[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2011, 7(3): 31-38. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-0780.2011.03.006
    [8]SUN Dianrong, LI Yuan, WANG Xuehui, WANG Yuezhong, WU Qia′er. Biological characteristics and stock changes of Loligo edulis in Beibu Gulf, South China Sea[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2011, 7(2): 8-13. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-0780.2011.02.002
    [9]LI Koujun, QIU Yongsong, WANG Yaozhong. Influence of natural environment variation on fishery resources in Beibu Gulf[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2007, 3(1): 7-13.
    [10]CHEN Zuo-zhi, QIU Yong-song. Stock variation of Parargyrops edita Tanaka in Beibu Gulf[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2005, 1(3): 26-31.

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(11)

    1. 李兵部，傅建军，陶易凡，强俊，徐跑. 基于D-loop序列和微卫星标记的4个黄颡鱼群体的遗传变异分析. 黑龙江畜牧兽医. 2024(04): 115-127 .
    2. 胡玉婷，凌俊，江河，汪焕，潘庭双，段国庆，周华兴，杨敏，李彤. 苏皖地区中华绒螯蟹养殖群体微卫星遗传多样性的评估. 渔业科学进展. 2024(06): 178-187 .
    3. 李大命，杨子萍，刘燕山，谷先坤，殷稼雯，蔡永久，唐晟凯，张彤晴. 基于线粒体COI序列的江淮下游湖泊鲢群体遗传多样性和遗传结构分析. 淡水渔业. 2023(04): 3-11 .
    4. 宋立民，王娜，郑英珍，丁子元，刘肖莲，姜巨峰，张韦，耿绪云. 基于微卫星标记技术的5个黄颡鱼群体遗传多样性分析. 经济动物学报. 2023(02): 101-108 .
    5. 葛锐，强壮，聂竹兰，李丽，魏杰. 基于高通量转录组测序的斑重唇鱼SSR分布及序列特征分析. 南方农业学报. 2023(03): 806-814 .
    6. 邹利，王金龙，李传武，王冬武，曾春芳，刘明求，刘丽，谢敏，曾鸣. 稻田适养品种呆鲤的遗传多样性分析. 水产科学. 2023(05): 795-804 .
    7. 黄皓，范嗣刚，王鹏飞，陈佳，赵超，闫路路，邱丽华，潘滢. 基于微卫星标记对6个花鲈群体的遗传多样性分析. 南方水产科学. 2022(01): 99-106 . 本站查看
    8. 胡玉婷，凌俊，江河，汪焕，潘庭双，周华兴. 中华绒螯蟹4个养殖群体遗传多样性与遗传结构分析. 江苏农业科学. 2022(16): 54-59 .
    9. 胡玉婷，侯冠军. 安徽省翘嘴鲌野生群体的遗传多样性分析. 生物学杂志. 2022(04): 79-83 .
    10. 罗宇婷，方弟安，周彦锋，徐东坡，彭云鑫，彭飞，张桂宁，刘凯，尤洋. 基于微卫星标记对长江下游鲢遗传多样性现状的分析. 南方水产科学. 2021(06): 48-57 . 本站查看
    11. 张显波，傅建军，胡锦丽，朱文彬，闵倩雯，赵飞，吴俣学，董在杰. 基于D-loop序列和SSR的从江田鱼与6个鲤群体的遗传分析. 贵州农业科学. 2021(12): 76-85 .

    Other cited types(5)

Catalog

    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML
    Article views (249) PDF downloads (27) Cited by(16)
    Related

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co., Ltd.  

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return