Volume 5 Issue 5
Oct.  2009
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Abstract
References
LI Haitao, HU Yunhua, WANG Yindong. Effects of acidifier on growth performance and feed utilization in hybrid tilapia (Oreochromis aureus ♂×O.niloticus ♀)[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2009, 5(5): 67-71. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-2227.2009.05.012
Citation: LI Haitao, HU Yunhua, WANG Yindong. Effects of acidifier on growth performance and feed utilization in hybrid tilapia (Oreochromis aureus ♂×O.niloticus ♀)[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2009, 5(5): 67-71. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-2227.2009.05.012
shu

Effects of acidifier on growth performance and feed utilization in hybrid tilapia (Oreochromis aureus ♂×O.niloticus ♀)

  • 1.

    Kemin Industries (Zhuhai) Co., Ltd., Zhuhai 519040, China

  • 2.

    School of Life Sciences, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China

More Information
  • Received Date: March 23, 2009
  • Revised Date: April 20, 2009
    Graphical Abstract
    • Abstract

  • An 8-week feeding trial was conducted to study the effects of acidifier on growth performance and feed utilization of tilapia. Four hundred and eighty tilapia juveniles with an average body weight of 5.35±0.02 g were randomly allocated into 16 tanks with 30 fish in each tank and fed with four experimental diets. The control group was fed with the basal diet, while the other groups were fed with diets supplemented with 0.1%, 0.2% and 0.3% acidifier, respectively. The results showed that the growth performance of 0.3% group was significantly improved (P < 0.05) compared with the control group. In addition, the feed coefficient and protein efficiency ratio improved accordingly. Supplementation of acidifier with different concentration in tilapia diets did not significantly affect the moisture, protein, lipid and ash contents of fish body. Hepatosomatic index, intraperitoneal fat ratio, blood concentration of cholesterol, triglyceride, high-density or low-density lipoprotein were not affected, neither. However, the viscerosomatic index of 0.3% group increased significantly compared with the control group (P < 0.05). The results suggested that supplementation of 0.3% acidifier in diets could significantly improve the growth performance and feed utilization of tilapia, but the fish meat quality was not affected.

    • FullText(HTML)
    • References (11)
  • [1]
    农业部渔业局. 中国渔业年鉴2008[G]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2008: 87. http://zjlib.superlib.net/detail?dxid=631883&channelid=11&enc=64d0620d0966493181ee946974dd9ebe
    [2]
    夏长青, 刘豫宁, 符冬岩. 饲料中添加柠檬酸促进鲤鱼生长的试验[J]. 上海水产大学学报, 1998, 7(增刊): 406-408.
    [3]
    冷向军, 钟炜, 黄春萍, 等. 饲料中添加柠檬酸对罗非鱼的养殖效果分析[J]. 广西农业生物科学, 2001, 20(4): 262-265. https://wf.pub/perios/article:gxnyswkx200104008
    [4]
    冷向军, 伦锋, 李小勤, 等. 柠檬酸对异育银鲫生长及营养物质消化率的影响[J]. 上海水产大学学报, 2006, 15(2): 78-181. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-7271.2006.02.010
    [5]
    BALAMURALI R S, ARAYINDAN C M. Citric acid as a feed stimulan[J]. Fish Tech, 1997, 34(1): 9-12. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Citric-Acid-as-a-Feed-stimulant-Balamurali-Aravindan/89fdecd756d836b44720b334e833594dc9e9116c
    [6]
    潘庆, 谭永刚, 毕英佐, 等. 酸制剂对罗非鱼生长和饲料利用的影响[J]. 水产学报, 2004, 28(5): 681-687. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0615.2004.06.013
    [7]
    戴振炎, 刘淑逑, 肖调义. 添加麦饭石和柠檬酸投喂革胡子鲶的试验研究[J]. 内陆水产, 1997(3): 4-6. https://kns.cnki.net/kcms2/article/abstract?v=QnUIp1GSfy5TBmlLWmYc2JJlNOFbU5MmnHmWr_IuSa11hOVhRo3HIr3oiDYraf1xudYsSYMA4VRdK1MzXXPqZ5qvYP5PB0dZ9M3x9mKP2Pmyozwk5Cs665gY9h1yYfpfsKzbe4_lWOK51JEolbp6UrGGkbJ-nC1kiqQXfSDNwjD-j9Fc52vILpGvxxl6fHS9&uniplatform=NZKPT&language=CHS
    [8]
    RUNGRUANGSAK K, UTNE F. Effect of different acidified wet feeds on protease activities in the digestive tract and on growth rate of rainbow trout[J]. Aquac, 1981, 22(1): 67-79. doi: 10.1016/0044-8486(81)90134-4
    [9]
    BARUAH K, SAHU N P, PAL A K, et al. Interactions of dietary microbial phytase, citric acid and crude protein level on mineral utilization by rohu, Labeo rohita (Hamilton), juveniles[J]. J World Aquac Soc, 2007, 38(2): 238-249. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-7345.2007.00092.x
    [10]
    范九国, 宋忠. 配饵添加柠檬酸养虾试验[J]. 齐鲁渔业, 1993(1): 33-34.
    [11]
    潘庆, 谭永刚, 毕英佐, 等. 柠檬酸对罗非鱼生长、体成分和消化酶活性的影响[J]. 中国水产科学, 2004, 11(4): 344-348. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1005-8737.2004.04.012
    • Related Articles

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(13)

    1. 杨燕，孙锟焜，谢艳萍，马燕天，张赫. 溶藻菌治理藻华的研究进展. 渔业研究. 2024(04): 413-424 .
    2. 胡晓娟，杨铿，文国樑，苏浩昌，许云娜，徐创文，徐煜，徐武杰，曹煜成. 溶藻菌CZBC1在氯化物型盐碱水中对铜绿微囊藻的溶藻效果研究. 南方水产科学. 2024(05): 169-175 . 本站查看
    3. 陈皓祥，邓益琴，程长洪，马红玲，郭志勋，冯娟. 养殖池塘14株芽孢杆菌的分离鉴定及抑菌效果. 热带生物学报. 2022(06): 605-613 .
    4. 赵鄢鹏，蔡忠贞，王冰，耿金峰，白雪梅. 眼点拟微绿球藻养殖过程中致死细菌的分离鉴定与治理. 江西农业学报. 2019(03): 16-22 .
    5. 孙卫芳，黄小帅，胡晓娟，文国樑，曹煜成，张建设. 广东沿海地区凡纳滨对虾EHP、VP_(AHPND)和SHIV感染情况调查与分析. 南方农业学报. 2019(10): 2343-2349 .
    6. 罗智伟，罗剑飞，林炜铁. 南美白对虾养殖水体中抑藻细菌的分离及鉴定. 现代食品科技. 2019(11): 109-113+51 .
    7. 王慧博，宋聃，黄晓丽，霍堂斌，王秋实，都雪. 生物絮团养殖池塘中浮游植物的群落结构特点. 水产学杂志. 2019(06): 29-35 .
    8. 耿金峰，赵鄢鹏，冯倩，蔡忠贞，王慧岭，张晋阳，王冰，刘敏胜，白雪梅. 眼点拟微绿球藻养殖过程中细菌污染的治理方法. 安徽农业科学. 2018(26): 63-67+76 .
    9. 张洪玉，王海波，杨移斌，赵明军，夏磊. 虾源蜡样芽孢杆菌D7的生态安全性评价. 浙江农业学报. 2018(09): 1585-1591 .
    10. 田雅洁，曹煜成，胡晓娟，黄小帅，徐煜，许云娜，李卓佳，文国樑. 4种因子对玫瑰红红球菌XH2氨氮去除效果的影响. 渔业科学进展. 2018(06): 164-172 .
    11. 胡晓娟，徐创文，李卓佳，文国樑，杨铿，许云娜，李莎莎，曹煜成. 响应面法优化蓝藻溶藻菌CZBC1发酵培养工艺. 南方农业学报. 2017(11): 2092-2099 .
    12. 徐煜，徐武杰，文国樑，胡晓娟，苏浩昌，杨铿，李卓佳，曹煜成. 颤藻浓度和水温对凡纳滨对虾响应颤藻粗提液毒性的影响. 南方水产科学. 2017(01): 26-32 . 本站查看
    13. 孙志伟，邱丽华，曹煜成，李卓佳，胡晓娟，苏浩昌，蔡卓平，文国樑. 蓝藻水华对水产养殖业影响的研究进展. 生态科学. 2017(01): 231-235 .

    Other cited types(12)

Catalog

    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML
    Article views (5197) PDF downloads (2818) Cited by(25)
    Related

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co., Ltd.  

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return