WEI Lei, ZHU Shuqin, LIU Wei, ZHAO Jinliang, QIAN Yezhou, WU Chao, QIAN De. Comparison on morphology and body spots characteristics between backcross progenies and their parents of mandarin fish[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2020, 16(2): 1-7. DOI: 10.12131/20190219
Citation: WEI Lei, ZHU Shuqin, LIU Wei, ZHAO Jinliang, QIAN Yezhou, WU Chao, QIAN De. Comparison on morphology and body spots characteristics between backcross progenies and their parents of mandarin fish[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2020, 16(2): 1-7. DOI: 10.12131/20190219

Comparison on morphology and body spots characteristics between backcross progenies and their parents of mandarin fish

More Information
  • Received Date: October 29, 2019
  • Revised Date: December 01, 2019
  • Accepted Date: January 09, 2020
  • Available Online: January 18, 2020
  • Since morphology and body spots characteristics are important breeding traits in mandarin fish crossbreeding, we analyzed the difference in quantifiable morphological traits of the backcross progeny [S. scherzeri ♀× (S. scherzeri ♀×S. chuatsi ♂)] and parental offspring (S. scherzeri, S. scherzeri ♀×S. chuatsi ♂) by multiple comparison, hybrid index, principal component analysis and discriminant analysis, and observed the body spots of the backcross. The results show that the average hybrid index of the backcross was 38.73. The morphometric difference analysis and hybrid index indicate that the backcross progenies were biased toward S. scherzeri. Principal component analysis and discriminant analysis reveal that the main differences lay in head angle, body height/body length, head height/head length, and C (the length from the back of the angle bone to the beginning of the ventral fin)/body length between the backcross progenies and their parents. The three-dimensional spatial distribution of the backcross, S. scherzeri and the hybrid on the first three principal components did not overlap and were distinguished from each other. Discriminant analysis can clearly classify the three groups in two-dimensional. The body spots of the backcross included back saddle spots and trunk spots which can be classified into four different combinations. 45.5% of the individuals had back saddle spots, and 72.8% had hollow spots. The results can provide data for cross breeding and hybrid identification of mandarin fish.

  • [1]
    BARTLEY D M, RANA K, IMMINK A J. The use of interspecific hybrids in aquaculture and fisheries[J]. Rev Fish Biol Fish, 2000, 10(3): 325-337. doi: 10.1023/A:1016691725361
    [2]
    楼允东, 李小勤. 中国鱼类远缘杂交研究及其在水产养殖上的应用[J]. 中国水产科学, 2006, 13(1): 151-158. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1005-8737.2006.01.024
    [3]
    XU H Q, LI Q, KONG L F, et al. Fertilization, survival and growth of hybrids between Crassostrea gigas and Crassostrea sikamea[J]. Aquaculture, 2019, 507: 91-96. doi: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2019.04.012
    [4]
    STILWELL J M, CAMUS A C, LEARY J H, et al. Pathologic changes associated with respiratory compromise and morbidity due to massive interlamellar Henneguya exilis infection in channel×blue hybrid catfish[J]. J Parasitol, 2019, 105(5): 686-692. doi: 10.1645/19-28
    [5]
    GUO H H, ZHENG G D, WU C B, et al. Comparative analysis of the growth performance and intermuscular bone traits in F1 hybrids of black bream (Megalobrama terminalis) (♀)×topmouth culter (Culter alburnus) (♂)[J]. Aquaculture, 2018, 492: 15-23. doi: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2018.03.037
    [6]
    ZHENG G D, GUO D D, WU C B, et al. The obvious heterosis and genetic characters of intergeneric cross and backcross juveniles between blunt snout bream (Megalobrama amblycephala) and topmouth culter (Culter alburnus)[J]. Aquacult Res, 2019, 50(6): 1-10.
    [7]
    朱晓平, 骆剑, 尹绍武, 等. 线纹尖塘鳢 (♀)、云斑尖塘鳢 (♂)及其杂交、回交子代遗传变异的微卫星分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2012, 28(17): 147-153. doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.2012-1083
    [8]
    赵新春, 贾智英, 李盛文, 等. 育成品种易捕鲤F5代保种群体的遗传结构研究[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 44(3): 28-36.
    [9]
    闫学春, 孙效文, 梁利群, 等. 鲤鲫杂交两种回交子代鱼的形态特征比较[J]. 东北农业大学学报, 2007, 38(6): 797-800. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-9369.2007.06.019
    [10]
    LIU Q F, LIU J M, LIANG Q L, et al. A hybrid lineage derived from hybridization of Carassius cuvieri and Carassius auratus red var. and a new type of improved fish obtained by backcrossing[J]. Aquaculture, 2019, 505: 173-182. doi: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2019.02.056
    [11]
    鲁凯. 黑格尔 (♂)×松石 (♀)和万宝路 (♂)×红妃 (♀)七彩神仙鱼杂交后代的遗传变异[D]. 上海: 上海海洋大学, 2018: 9-17.
    [12]
    王燕, 张勇, 张海发, 等. 两种杂交石斑鱼及其亲本的形态差异分析[J]. 水产学报, 2014, 38(6): 778-785.
    [13]
    YAO G C, LI W. Aquaculture in China: success stories and modern trends[M]. Oxford: John Wiley & Sons, 2018: 256-269.
    [14]
    LI Y, SHI J, SHI S, et al. Effect of live, frozen and artificial feeds on digestive enzymes, aminotransferase, histology of liver and intestine in mandarin fish hybrid (Siniperca chuatsi ♀×Siniperca scherzeri♂)[J]. Isr J Aaquacult-Bamid, 2015, 67: 1185-1192.
    [15]
    钱叶周, 吴超, 赵金良, 等. 秋浦杂交斑鳜[J]. 中国水产, 2016(2): 58-60.
    [16]
    李桂峰, 卢薛, 古勇明, 等. 长珠杂交鳜推广指南[J]. 中国水产, 2017(9): 52-56.
    [17]
    魏磊, 赵金良, 刘伟, 等. 鳜回交子代早期形态、生长与摄食特征[J]. 淡水渔业, 2019, 49(5): 93-97. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6907.2019.05.014
    [18]
    单建杰. 不同地区来源的翘嘴鳜与斑鳜自交及杂交子一代部分生物学性状比较研究[D]. 天津: 天津农学院, 2018: 9-17.
    [19]
    许淼洋, 郭金涛, 赵金良, 等. 斑鳜(♀)×鳜(♂)杂交子一代、子二代的形态特征分析[J]. 水产科学, 2013, 32(11): 636-640. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-1111.2013.11.002
    [20]
    STRAUSS R E, BOOKSTEIN F L. The truss: body form reconstructions in morphometrics[J]. Syst Zool, 1982, 31(2): 113-135. doi: 10.2307/2413032
    [21]
    MENGUMPHAN K, PANASE P. Morphometric and meristic divergence of two hybrid catfish: backcross (F1 hybrid female×Pangasianodon gigas Chevey 1931 male) and reciprocal backcross (P. gigas, female×F1 hybrid male)[J]. Asian Fish Sci, 2015, 28(1): 37-46.
    [22]
    VASIL'EVA E D, RACHEK E I, AMVROSOV D Y, et al. A comparative morphological analysis of the clonal progeny from a female hybrid sterlet Acipenser ruthenus×Kaluga A. dauricus (Acipenseridae): the genetic and modification variability in a number of quantitative morphological traits[J]. J Ichthyol, 2018, 58(5): 662-669. doi: 10.1134/S0032945218050193
    [23]
    李炎璐, 陈超, 陈建国, 等. 云纹石斑鱼(♀)×鞍带石斑鱼(♂)杂交F1与亲本的形态学比较[J]. 广东海洋大学学报, 2018, 38(6): 4-8.
    [24]
    HOCKADAY S, BEDDOW T A, STONE M, et al. Using truss networks to estimate the biomass of Oreochromis niloticus, and to investigate shape characteristics[J]. J Fish Biol, 2000, 57(4): 981-1000. doi: 10.1111/j.1095-8649.2000.tb02206.x
    [25]
    曹栋正, 陈四清, 严俊丽, 等. 星突江鲽和石鲽正反杂交种的形态变异分析[J]. 中国水产科学, 2016, 23(4): 871-881.
    [26]
    田永胜, 段会敏, 唐江, 等. 石斑鱼杂交种“云龙斑”与亲本的表型数量性状判别分析[J]. 上海海洋大学学报, 2017, 26(6): 11-20.
    [27]
    吴玉萍, 田永胜, 李振通, 等. 棕点石斑鱼(♀)×蓝身大斑石斑鱼(♂)杂交后代与亲本的形态差异[J]. 广东海洋大学学报, 2019, 39(6): 17-22. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-9159.2019.06.003
    [28]
    MCKINNEY G J, VARIAN A, SCARDINA J, et al. Genetic and morphological divergence in three strains of brook trout Salvelinus fontinalis commonly stocked in Lake Superior[J]. PLoS One, 2014, 9(11): 221-229.
    [29]
    ERGUDEN D, TURAN C. Examination of gentic and morphologic structure of sea-bass (Dicenrearchus labrax L. 1758) populationsin Turkish coastal waters[J]. Turk J Vet Sci, 2005, 29(3): 727-733.
    [30]
    RUBIDGE E M, TAYLOR E B. Hybrid zone structure and the potential role of selection in hybridizing populations of native westslope cutthroat trout (Oncorhynchus clarki lewisi) and introduced rainbow trout (O. mykiss)[J]. Mol Ecol, 2010, 13(12): 3735-3749.
    [31]
    MARSHALL D J, ULLER T. When is a maternal effect adaptive?[J]. Oikos, 2007, 116(12): 1957-1963. doi: 10.1111/j.2007.0030-1299.16203.x
    [32]
    金万昆, 俞丽, 杨建新, 等. 赤眼鳟(♀)与鳙(♂)杂交F1生物学特性[J]. 中国水产科学, 2012, 19(4): 611-619.
    [33]
    吴水清, 郑乐云, 罗辉玉, 等. 杂交石斑鱼(斜带石斑鱼♀×赤点石斑鱼♂)与其亲本形态性状比较研究[J]. 南方水产科学, 2017, 13(5): 47-54. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-0780.2017.05.007
    [34]
    杨宁, 吴常信. 亲本对后代群体的不均等遗传贡献及其优化控制[J]. 遗传学报, 1993, 20(1): 294-299.
  • Related Articles

    [1]JIANG Yongsheng, ZHOU Shanshan, ZHOU Yongdong, XU Kaida, ZHEN Xiaoman, JIAO Lishi, ZHANG Qiuhong, QU Yao. Effects of water temperature in transportation on mortality and physiological indicators of Sepiella japonica[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2024, 20(4): 107-115. DOI: 10.12131/20240089
    [2]LI Haohua, LIAO Tao, BAI Chan, QIU Liang, ZU Xiaoyan, LI Hailan, CHEN Liping, XIONG Guangquan, WANG Juguang. Effects of pre-transport density and temperature domestication on simulated transport of juvenile Ictalurus punctatus[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2024, 20(2): 160-171. DOI: 10.12131/20230154
    [3]WANG Chaoqi, XU Bingjie, WU Tao, YANG Ling, LIU Yiming, PAN Ying. Comparative study on breeding density of Lutraria sieboldii in nursery culture and adult culture in Beibu Gulf beaches of Guangxi Province, China[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2023, 19(4): 105-115. DOI: 10.12131/20230046
    [4]CHEN Xu, ZHAO Wang, CHEN Mingqiang, TAN Chunming, YU Gang. Effects of salinity stress on oxygen consumption rate, ammonia excretion rate and immune-related enzyme activities of Strombus luhuanus[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2022, 18(5): 160-165. DOI: 10.12131/20210346
    [5]CHEN Xiaojiang, XIONG Liling, WU Jiangu, QI Lu, WANG Quan. Effects of anesthetic MS-222 and eugenol on oxygen consumption rate and ammonia excretion rate of Sinogastromyzon szechuanensis[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2020, 16(4): 69-74. DOI: 10.12131/20190261
    [6]CAO Xiaocong, HUANG Xiaolin, SUN Xinyi, LIN Heizhao, SHU Hu, YANG Yukai, HUANG Zhong. Anaesthesia effects of eugenol on juvenile Siganus oramin[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2019, 15(3): 50-56. DOI: 10.12131/20180232
    [7]LI Dandan, CHEN Pimao, ZHU Aiyi, YUAN Huarong, CHEN Wenjing, LONG Xinling, WANG Wenjie. Recovery level of metabolic enzymes in juvenile black sea bream (Sparus macrocephlus) after exhaustive exercise[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2018, 14(6): 59-65. DOI: 10.12131/20180064
    [8]LI Dandan, CHEN Pimao, ZHU Aiyi, YUAN Huarong, FENG Xue, WANG Wenjie, CHEN Wenjing, LONG Xinling. Effect of transport density on survival rate of black seabream sealed in oxygenated plastic bag during stock enhancement[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2018, 14(5): 36-44. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-0780.2018.05.005
    [9]YANG Qibin, YE Le, WEN Weigeng, WANG Yu, JIANG Shigui. Effect of salinity on molting, survival, growth and feed conversion rate of juvenile Penaeus monodon[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2008, 4(1): 16-21.
    [10]TANG Xianming, SUI Zhao, TIAN Jingbo, WANG Guofu. Effects of salinity on metabolic rate of juvenile turbot (Scophamus maximus)[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2006, 2(4): 54-58.
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(11)

    1. 王大伟,邢盈,蒋成宇,胡淼,赵金良. 放养密度对鳜幼鱼HPI轴激素、应激酶活力及呼吸频率的影响. 淡水渔业. 2025(02): 26-32 .
    2. 何静怡,魏涯,岑剑伟,郝淑贤,陈胜军,黄卉,赵永强,王悦齐,杨少玲,林织. 基于梯度降温的草鱼暂养及有水保活运输技术. 食品科学. 2024(04): 271-278 .
    3. 何静怡,郑伟,黄卉,岑剑伟,赵永强,王田,魏涯,郝淑贤,杨少玲,陈琛. 不同温度、盐度条件对草鱼暂养及应激保活的影响. 大连海洋大学学报. 2024(04): 597-605 .
    4. 梁雪莹,郑晓婷,陈秋羽,谢静怡,董宏标,李勇,杨金龙,陈成勋,张家松. 模拟运输胁迫对牛蛙幼蛙生理机能的影响. 广东海洋大学学报. 2024(06): 118-126 .
    5. 刘浩,李洁,李亚军,康鹏天,张国维,邵东宏,王建福. 水体中泥沙含量对虹鳟生存、生理和体表微生物的影响. 中国水产科学. 2024(11): 1365-1374 .
    6. 唐忠林,张佳佳,周国勤,陈树桥,徐钢春,徐跑,强俊,王佩佩. 丁香酚对“优鲈3号”幼鱼运输水质及其血液、肌肉生理指标的影响. 水产科技情报. 2023(01): 44-52 .
    7. 王文雯,杨静茹,付正祎,于刚,马振华. 运输时间对高体鰤幼鱼应激、代谢、抗氧化和免疫的影响. 中国渔业质量与标准. 2023(02): 25-36 .
    8. 李哲,周珊珊,王好学,王嘉浩,陈璐,徐开达. 运输振荡对条石鲷幼鱼生理应激和水体总氨氮含量的影响. 水产科技情报. 2023(05): 327-332 .
    9. 范宏博,胡丁月,徐莉,孙浩,刘峰,刘春娥,张小栓. 运输密度和时间对单环刺螠保活运输品质的影响. 农业工程. 2023(10): 72-77 .
    10. 虞为,陈雪晴,杨育凯,张燕娃,黄小林,黄忠,李涛,马振华,吴洽儿,于刚,周传朋,林黑着. 饲料中添加雨生红球藻对尖吻鲈生长性能、抗氧化能力及免疫状态的影响. 南方水产科学. 2022(05): 46-54 . 本站查看
    11. 陈旭,赵旺,陈明强,谭春明,于刚. 盐度胁迫对红娇凤凰螺耗氧率、排氨率以及免疫相关酶活性的影响. 南方水产科学. 2022(05): 160-165 . 本站查看

    Other cited types(4)

Catalog

    Article views PDF downloads Cited by(15)
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return