Jiangtao LI, Kaiyu YANG, Xiaotong QIU, Junchao FANG, Feifei HUANG, Xiaolong QIU, Xiaojing LYU, Rishen LIANG, Qingqing LI, Li LIN. Comparison of growth and morphological characteristics of inbred and hybrid families of Micropterus salmoides from Foshan and Taiwan populations[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2021, 17(5): 1-9. DOI: 10.12131/20200262
Citation: Jiangtao LI, Kaiyu YANG, Xiaotong QIU, Junchao FANG, Feifei HUANG, Xiaolong QIU, Xiaojing LYU, Rishen LIANG, Qingqing LI, Li LIN. Comparison of growth and morphological characteristics of inbred and hybrid families of Micropterus salmoides from Foshan and Taiwan populations[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2021, 17(5): 1-9. DOI: 10.12131/20200262

Comparison of growth and morphological characteristics of inbred and hybrid families of Micropterus salmoides from Foshan and Taiwan populations

More Information
  • Received Date: December 24, 2020
  • Revised Date: February 21, 2021
  • Accepted Date: March 22, 2021
  • Available Online: April 12, 2021
  • Taking Foshan and Taiwan populations of Micropterus salmoides as parents, we established four populations including Foshan inbreeding group (Foshan ♀×Foshan ♂), Taiwan inbreeding group (Taiwan ♀×Taiwan ♂), normal progeny (Foshan ♀×Taiwan ♂) and reciprocal progeny (Taiwan ♀×Foshan ♂) , and carried out a 6-month experiment, in order to compare their growth and morphological characteristics. Results show that the growth performance and coefficient of variation for body mass were significantly higher in the hybid groups than in the two inbred groups. The results of morphological analysis show that the morphological differences of the four populations were mainly in the middle part of trunk and tail. The contribution rate of the first three principal components was 92.9%, and that of the first principal component was 71.3%, mainly reflecting the morphological characteristics of the front and middle part of the body. The contribution rate of the second principal component was 16.6%, reflecting the characteristics of the tail region of fish body. In the scatter plot of the scores of the first two principal components, the four populations could be completely distinguished due to the low overlap area. The stepwise discriminant model constructed by combining measurable traits and frame traits showed the highest accuracy (86.7%–96.0%). The results provide references for the growth and morphological identification of hybrid families of M. salmoides from Foshan and Taiwan populations.
  • [1]
    FAN J, BAI J, MA D. Isolation and characterization of 40 SNP in largemouth bass (Micropterus salmoides)[J]. Conserv Genet Res, 2020, 12(1): 57-60. doi: 10.1007/s12686-018-1076-2
    [2]
    MA H J, MOU M M, PU D C, et al. Effect of dietary starch level on growth, metabolism enzyme and oxidative status of juvenile largemouth bass, Micropterus salmoides[J]. Aquaculture, 2019, 498: 482-487. doi: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2018.07.039
    [3]
    王佩佩, 周国勤, 陈树桥. 大口黑鲈北方亚种, 佛罗里达亚种及“优鲈3号”杂交F1子代生长性能及遗传多样性分析[J]. 海洋渔业, 2020, 42(4): 403-409. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-2490.2020.04.003
    [4]
    梁素娴, 孙效文, 白俊杰, 等. 微卫星标记对中国引进加州鲈养殖群体遗传多样性的分析[J]. 水生生物学报. 2008, 32(5): 694-700.
    [5]
    樊佳佳, 白俊杰, 李胜杰, 等. 大口黑鲈微卫星DNA指纹图谱的构建和遗传结构分析[J]. 水生生物学报, 2012, 36(4): 600-609.
    [6]
    梁素娴, 白俊杰, 叶星, 等. 养殖大口黑鲈的遗传多样性分析[J]. 大连水产学院学报, 2007, 22(4): 260-263.
    [7]
    朱新平, 杜合军, 郑光明, 等. 大口黑鲈养殖群体遗传多样性的分析[J]. 大连水产学院学报, 2006, 21(4): 341-345. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-9957.2006.04.010
    [8]
    卢建峰, 白俊杰, 李胜杰, 等. 大口黑鲈选育群体遗传多样性的AFLP分析[J]. 淡水渔业, 2010, 40(3): 3-7. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6907.2010.03.001
    [9]
    孙成飞, 谢汶峰, 胡婕, 等. 大口黑鲈3个养殖群体的遗传多样性分析[J]. 南方水产科学, 2019, 15 (2): 64-71. doi: 10.12131/20180203
    [10]
    刘海涌, 李胜杰, 白俊杰. 大口黑鲈养殖群体和引进群体生长性能的比较分析[J]. 水产养殖, 2015, 36(9): 1-5. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-2091.2015.09.001
    [11]
    HWANG E K, YOTSUKURA N, PANG S J, et al. Seaweed breeding programs and progress in eastern Asian countries[J]. Phycologia, 2019, 58(5): 484-495. doi: 10.1080/00318884.2019.1639436
    [12]
    FARRÉ M, LOMBARTE A, RECASENS L, et al. Habitat influence in the morphological diversity of coastal fish assemblages[J]. J Sea Res, 2015, 99: 107-117. doi: 10.1016/j.seares.2015.03.002
    [13]
    苟盼盼, 王秀利, 窦冬雨, 等. 红鳍东方鲀不同家系群体的形态性状差异与相关性分析[J]. 大连海洋大学学报, 2019, 34(5): 674-679.
    [14]
    李江涛, 林小涛, 周晨辉, 等. 实验室条件下唐鱼两性异形及其与游泳能力关系[J]. 应用生态学报, 2016, 27(5): 1639-1646.
    [15]
    周家辉, 李胜杰, 姜鹏. 大口黑鲈北方亚种群体和“优鲈1号”群体及其正反杂交子代的遗传和生长性能比较[J]. 海洋渔业, 2020, 42(3): 324. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-2490.2020.03.008
    [16]
    黄建盛, 陈刚, 张健东, 等. 褐点石斑鱼不同月龄形态性状的主成分及通径分析[J]. 水产学报, 2017, 41(7): 1105-1115.
    [17]
    韩慧宗, 姜海滨, 王斐, 等. 许氏平鲉不同月龄选育群体形态性状的主成分与通径分析[J]. 水产学报, 2016, 40(8): 1163-1172.
    [18]
    周惠强, 李芬, 舒琥, 等. 大刺鳅雌雄个体形态差异分析[J]. 广东海洋大学学报, 2019, 39(1): 1-6.
    [19]
    马爱军, 王新安, 孙志宾, 等. 红鳍东方鲀 (Takifugu rubripes) 三个不同群体的形态差异分析[J]. 海洋与湖沼, 2016, 47(1): 166-172.
    [20]
    蔡磊, 白俊杰, 李胜杰, 等. 大口黑鲈北方亚种, 佛罗里达亚种及其杂交子代的生长和形态差异分析[J]. 水产学报, 2012, 36(6): 801-808.
    [21]
    王炳谦, 谷伟, 贾钟贺, 等. 4个品系虹鳟生产性能的比较[J]. 大连水产学院学报, 2007, 22(3): 170-174. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-9957.2007.03.003
    [22]
    李思发, 蔡完其. 团头鲂双向选育效应研究[J]. 水产学报, 2000, 24(3): 201-205.
    [23]
    孙龙芳, 李姣, 梁旭方, 等. 翘嘴鳜F3~F5群体选育效果分析[J]. 广东农业科学, 2014, 41(13): 114-118. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-874X.2014.13.025
    [24]
    周劲松, 曹哲明, 杨国梁, 等. 罗氏沼虾缅甸引进种和浙江本地种及其杂交种的生长性能与 SRAP 分析[J]. 中国水产科学, 2006, 13(4): 667-673. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1005-8737.2006.04.025
    [25]
    陈林, 李思发, 简伟业, 等. 吉奥罗非鱼 (新吉富罗非鱼♀×奥利亚罗非鱼♂) 生长性能的评估[J]. 上海水产大学学报, 2008, 17(3): 257-262.
    [26]
    王新安, 马爱军, 陈超, 等. 七带石斑鱼 (Epinephelus septemfasciatus) 两个野生群体形态差异分析[J]. 海洋与湖沼, 2008, 39(6): 655-660. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0029-814X.2008.06.017
    [27]
    马爱军, 王新安, 雷霁霖, 等. 大菱鲆 (Scophthalmus maximus) 四个不同地理群体数量形态特征比较[J]. 海洋与湖沼, 2008, 39(1): 24-29. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0029-814X.2008.01.004
    [28]
    RICHARD H, EDITORS H C. Black bass biology and management[M]. Washington, D. C.: Sport Fishing Institute, 1975: 67-75.
    [29]
    BAI J, LUTZ-CARRILLO D J, QDUAN Y, et al. Taxonomic status and genetic diversity of cultured largemouth bass Micropterus salmoides in China[J]. Aquaculture, 2008, 278(1/2/3/4): 27-30.
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(16)

    1. 张钰伟,赵旺,邓正华,黄星美,温为庚,孙敬锋,王瑞旋. 芽孢杆菌对方斑东风螺生长、存活、免疫及消化酶活性的影响. 南方水产科学. 2023(01): 106-115 . 本站查看
    2. 肖博,周胜杰,汪迎港,付正祎,方伟,于刚,马振华. 发酵黄芪对棕点石斑鱼的生长、消化、免疫功能和抗氨氮能力的影响. 南方水产科学. 2023(02): 161-169 . 本站查看
    3. 周文川,王芸,段亚飞,王珺,周传朋,黄忠. 饲料中添加红景天对凡纳滨对虾抗氧化功能及盐度骤变适应性的影响. 中国农学通报. 2023(14): 144-151 .
    4. 陈旭 ,左涛 ,周胜杰 ,杨蕊 ,于刚 ,秦传新 ,马振华 . 饲喂甘草后低盐胁迫对尖吻鲈相关酶活性的影响. 水产科学. 2023(03): 404-412 .
    5. 郭倩倩,张航,朱琳琳. 植物提取物在水产动物免疫上的应用研究概述. 南方农业. 2022(18): 175-177 .
    6. 李会峰,李二超,徐畅,周利,陈立侨. 饲料中添加水飞蓟素对低盐度下凡纳滨对虾生长、免疫、肝胰腺组织结构及肠道菌群的影响. 水产学报. 2021(01): 98-114 .
    7. 孙彩云,董宏标,王文豪,李勇,古群红,段亚飞,张家松,许晓东. 月桂酸单甘油酯对花鲈脂质代谢的影响. 南方水产科学. 2021(01): 67-75 . 本站查看
    8. 虞为,杨育凯,林黑着,黄小林,黄忠,李涛,周传朋,马振华,荀鹏伟,杨长平. 牛磺酸对花鲈生长性能、消化酶活性、抗氧化能力及免疫指标的影响. 南方水产科学. 2021(02): 78-86 . 本站查看
    9. 王迎伟,任昕,陈君,陈永庆,耿硕,郑超,李杨,于佳佳,王立新. 黄河盐碱地区南美白对虾淡化技术研究. 家畜生态学报. 2021(04): 57-62 .
    10. 杨肖杰,黄卉,李来好,杨贤庆,赵永强,岑剑伟,郝淑贤. 南美白对虾酶促剥壳工艺优化及其对虾仁品质的影响. 食品与发酵工业. 2021(11): 119-125 .
    11. 韩梦瑶,王晓梅,王占旗,叶金云,张忠山. 天然活性多糖在水产动物养殖中的应用. 水产学杂志. 2021(04): 85-92 .
    12. 樊英,王晓璐,刘吉丹,刘洪军,王友红,盖春蕾,许拉,叶海斌,吴海一,麻丹萍,张涛. 盐度胁迫对非洲斑节对虾生理特征的影响. 广西科学院学报. 2021(02): 123-132 .
    13. 苏家齐,祝华萍,朱长波,张博,李婷,陈素文. 盐度和钠离子/钾离子对凡纳滨对虾幼虾存活与组织结构的影响. 南方水产科学. 2021(05): 45-53 . 本站查看
    14. 董甜甜,崔彦婷,王忠凯,龙劲男,陈怡更,王聪,赵楠楠,王仁杰,李玉全. 高盐胁迫对凡纳滨对虾(Litopenaeus vannamei)生长、代谢和抗氧化酶活力的影响. 海洋与湖沼. 2020(05): 1239-1245 .
    15. 虞为,杨育凯,陈智彬,林黑着,黄小林,周传朋,杨铿,曹煜成,黄忠,马振华,李涛,王珺,王芸,荀鹏伟,黄倩倩,于万峰. 饲料中添加螺旋藻对花鲈生长性能、消化酶活性、血液学指标及抗氧化能力的影响. 南方水产科学. 2019(03): 57-67 . 本站查看
    16. 王伟,胡立新,伏光华,张海丽. 红景天苷单克隆抗体的制备及间接竞争酶联免疫方法的建立. 福建农业学报. 2019(05): 595-599 .

    Other cited types(6)

Catalog

    Article views (916) PDF downloads (69) Cited by(22)
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return