Citation: | ZHU Huaping, LU Maixin, HUANG Zhanghan, GAO Fengying. Evaluation of selective breeding effect of Oreochromis mossambicus and O.hornorum at fourth generation[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2008, 4(3): 1-6. |
Selective breeding were performed on the base populations of Oreochromis mossambicus and O.hornorum respectively, and F4 generations were produced and evaluated. Compared with control group, the daily growth rate of F4 of O.mossambicus and O.hornorum was improved by 27.96% and 36.73% (P < 0.05), and the average selection response per generation was 6.99% and 9.18%, while variation coefficient of body weight was reduced by 24.83% and 36.33% over the control group, respectively. At the first sex maturity, the mean body weight of the selected group F4 was increased more than two times of the control group respectively, and their hybrids[O.mossambicus ♀ (XX) × O.hornorum ♂ (ZZ)]had high and stable male rate. All these results showed that selection response of the two kinds of tilapia is remarkable, and the individual growth rate was turned to be consistent in the selected population. It also indicated that there are still some selection potentials in F4 generations, and it is feasible to proceed with selective breeding for growth of the two kinds of tilapia.
[1] |
卢迈新, 黄樟翰. 罗非鱼遗传育种研究[J]. 上海水产大学学报, 2005, 14(2): 186-191. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-7271.2005.02.016
|
[2] |
HULATA G, WOHLFARTH G W, HALEVY A. Mass selection for growth rate in the Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus)[J]. Aquac, 1986, 57(1/4): 177-181. doi: 10.1016/0044-8486(86)90195-X
|
[3] |
EKNATH A E, TAYAMEN M M, PALADA-DE VERA M S, et al. Genetic improvement of farmed tilapias: the growth performance of eight strains of Oreochromis niloticus tested in different farm environments[J]. Aquac, 1993, 111(1/4): 171-188. doi: 10.1016/0044-8486(93)90035-W
|
[4] |
李思发, 李晨虹, 李家乐, 等. 尼罗罗非鱼选育三代效果评价[J]. 上海水产大学学报, 2001, 10(4): 289-292. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-7271.2001.04.001
|
[5] |
CHARO-KARISA H, KOMEN H, REZK MA, et al. Heritability estimates and response to selection for growth of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) in low-input earthen ponds[J]. Aquac, 2006, 261(2): 479-486. doi: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2006.07.007
|
[6] |
杨弘, 吴婷婷, 夏德全. 三种奥尼杂交罗非鱼养殖效果比较[J]. 科学养鱼, 2005(3): 18. https://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/periodical/Ch9QZXJpb2RpY2FsQ0hJTmV3UzIwMjQxMTA1MTcxMzA0Eg1reHl5MjAwNTAzMDEwGghlZnFhN3hyag%3D%3D
|
[7] |
杨淞, 卢迈新, 黄樟翰, 等. 5种杂交F1罗非鱼生长性能比较研究[J]. 淡水渔业, 2006, 36(4): 41-44. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6907.2006.04.010
|
[8] |
吴清江, 桂建芳. 鱼类遗传育种工程[M]. 上海: 上海科学技术出版社, 1999: 45-60. https://xueshu.baidu.com/usercenter/paper/show?paperid=aadbb6433125384b76e83cf25f721fe6&site=xueshu_se&hitarticle=1
|
[9] |
夏德全. 中国罗非鱼养殖现状及发展前景[J]. 科学养鱼, 2000, 5(1): 21. http://qikan.cqvip.com/Qikan/Article/Detail?id=4191481
|
[10] |
EKNATH A E, REYES R A, BOLIVAR H L, et al. Genetic improvement of farmed tilapia: estimation of genetic variation and heritability for age and size at first spawning in Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus)[J]. Aquac, 1995, 137(1/4): 279-280. doi: 10.1016/0044-8486(96)83575-7
|
[11] |
BOLIVAR R B, NEWKIRK G F. Response to within family selection for body weight in Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) using a single-trait animal model[J]. Aquac, 2002, 204(3/4): 371-381. doi: 10.1016/S0044-8486(01)00824-9
|
[12] |
PONZONI R W, HAMZAH A, TAN S, et al. Genetic parameters and response to selection for live weight in the GIFT strain of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus)[J]. Aquac, 2005, 247(1/4): 203-210. doi: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2005.02.020
|
[13] |
HUANG C M, LIAO I C. Response to mass selection for growth rate in Oreochromis niloticus[J]. Aquac, 1990, 85(1/4): 199-205. doi: 10.1016/0044-8486(90)90019-J
|
[14] |
PANTE M J, GJERDE B, MCMILLAN I. Inbreeding levels in selected populations of rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss[J]. Aquac, 2001, 192(2/4): 213-224. doi: 10.1016/S0044-8486(00)00466-X
|
[15] |
DUNHAM RA, RUMMETT RE. Response of two generations of selection to increased body weight in channel catfish, Ictalurus punctatus, compared to hybridization with blue catfish, I. furcatus, males[J]. J Appl Aquac, 1999, 9(3): 37-45. doi: 10.1300/J028v09n03_03
|
[16] |
GJEDREM T. Selective breeding to improve aquaculture production[J]. World Aquac, 1997, 28(4): 33-45. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/284653176_Selective_breeding_to_improve_aquaculture_production
|
[17] |
楼允东. 鱼类育种学[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 1999: 300-321.
|
[18] |
吴婷婷. 奥尼杂交罗非鱼的形成和生产[J]. 科学养鱼, 1996(2): 13. https://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/periodical/Ch9QZXJpb2RpY2FsQ0hJTmV3UzIwMjQxMTA1MTcxMzA0Eg5RSzE5OTYwMDMzNTE1NxoIeTJrZnYzcWM%3D
|
1. |
房恩军,郭彪,郑德斌,张雪,王硕,王宇. 渤海湾7种虾虎鱼科鱼类COI基因序列特征及分子分类研究. 天津农业科学. 2023(09): 32-37 .
![]() | |
2. |
徐长春,郑楠,孙巍,李成栋,张元良,周庆贵. 基于PLC和触摸屏的深海网箱自动投饵远程控制系统. 江苏海洋大学学报(自然科学版). 2022(01): 16-22 .
![]() | |
3. |
乔毅,沈辉,蒋葛,成婕,曹晓慧,窦雅斌,刘学实,万夕和,史文军,王李宝,黎慧,贲成凯,孙瑞建. 我国哈氏仿对虾资源分布、保护及开发利用现状. 浙江海洋大学学报(自然科学版). 2022(06): 550-557 .
![]() | |
4. |
易晓英,邱康文,周霄,招春旭,邓裕坚,何雄波,颜云榕. 北部湾斑鳍白姑鱼渔业生物学分析. 上海海洋大学学报. 2021(03): 515-524 .
![]() | |
5. |
张聿琛,谷德贤,徐海龙,薛薇,于小涵. 基于栖息地指数的渤海湾鱼卵环境适应性. 中国水产科学. 2021(12): 1568-1575 .
![]() | |
6. |
刘修泽,郭栋,王爱勇,董婧,王小林,段妍,柴雨. 辽东湾水域小黄鱼的生长特征. 海洋渔业. 2018(02): 139-146 .
![]() | |
7. |
王炳臣,郑世玲,张洪霞,魏文超,王欧美,刘芳华. 渤海不同区域沉积物古菌的多样性分析. 海洋科学. 2017(05): 8-16 .
![]() | |
8. |
席丽萍,王居安,邱雨燕,蔡生力,戴习林,刘红. 池塘养殖凡纳滨对虾幼虾到成虾阶段生长差异研究. 上海海洋大学学报. 2017(05): 691-698 .
![]() | |
9. |
徐海龙,陈勇,陈新军,谷德贤,乔秀亭. 引入不确定性对Von Bertalanffy生长方程关系参数估算的影响. 水产科学. 2016(02): 169-173 .
![]() | |
10. |
刘永新,刘奕,刘英杰,杨润清. 牙鲆体质量与形态性状的异速生长分析. 南方水产科学. 2016(01): 36-42 .
![]() | |
11. |
宁加佳,杜飞雁,王雪辉,谷阳光,王亮根,李亚芳. 基于稳定同位素的口虾蛄食性分析. 水产学报. 2016(06): 903-910 .
![]() | |
12. |
李玉虎,宋芹芹,张志怀,黄皓,周海龙,相建海. 凡纳滨对虾生长发育规律及生长曲线拟合研究. 南方水产科学. 2015(01): 89-95 .
![]() | |
13. |
张波,袁伟,王俊. 崂山湾春季鱼类群落的摄食生态及其主要种类. 中国水产科学. 2015(04): 820-827 .
![]() |