LI Junwei, GUO Yongjian, HU Ruiping, CHEN Suwen, XIE Xiaoyong, ZHU Changbo, LI Ting. Comparative analysis of nutritional composition of Sipunculus nudus Linnaeus in different aquaculture modes[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2018, 14(4): 80-87. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-0780.2018.04.010
Citation: LI Junwei, GUO Yongjian, HU Ruiping, CHEN Suwen, XIE Xiaoyong, ZHU Changbo, LI Ting. Comparative analysis of nutritional composition of Sipunculus nudus Linnaeus in different aquaculture modes[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2018, 14(4): 80-87. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-0780.2018.04.010

Comparative analysis of nutritional composition of Sipunculus nudus Linnaeus in different aquaculture modes

More Information
  • Received Date: January 21, 2018
  • Revised Date: April 13, 2018
  • Available Online: December 04, 2018
  • To study the effects of two aquaculture modes (tidal flat and pond) on the composition of fatty acids, amino acids and mineral elements of Sipunculus nudus Linnaeus, we compared the nutritional composition in the body wall of S.nudus and mineral elements in sediments. The results indicate that the effect of aquaculture environment on the protein, fat, ash and total fatty acid contents of S.nudus were insignificant (P>0.05). There was significant difference among C22:0, C20:3 (n-3), C16:1, C18:2 (n-6), C23:0 and C20:5 (n-3) in the two aquaculture modes (P<0.05), and the diatom characteristic fatty acids (C16:1 (n-7)/C16:0 and C20:5 (n-3)) in tidal flat were significantly higher than those in pond (P<0.05). The total amino acids and Glu contents of S.nudus in pond were significantly higher than those in tidal flat (P<0.05), and there was no significant difference in the essential ammonia acids of S.nudus between the two groups (P>0.05). The contents of the K, Na, Mg, Ca and Se in the body wall of S.nudus and in sediments in pond mode were higher than that those in tidal flat mode (P<0.05), and the K, Se contents in the body wall of S.nudus in the two aquaculture modes were higher than those in sediments (P<0.05). The results indicate that different environment will not significantly affect the basic nutritional composition of S.nudus which can accumulate K, Na, Mg, Ca and Se to a certain extent but can not accumulate Fe, Zn, Mn, Cu, Pb, Cr, Cd and Co significantly.
  • [1]
    兰国宝, 阎冰, 廖思明. 方格星虫胚胎与幼体发育的研究[J]. 热带海洋学报, 2003, 22(6): 70-76.
    [2]
    张琴, 许明珠, 童潼, 等. 饲料中不同糖原对方格星虫稚虫日增重和消化酶的影响[J]. 南方水产科学, 2014, 10(1): 21-26.
    [3]
    李俊伟, 朱长波, 颉晓勇, 等. 方格星虫的繁育、养殖及研究开发进展[J]. 南方水产科学, 2014, 10(5): 94-98.
    [4]
    胡笑丛. 星虫微量元素含量的测定[J]. 水产科学, 2005, 24(6): 12-14.
    [5]
    董兰芳, 张琴, 许明珠. 方格星虫多糖的分离纯化及单糖组成[J]. 食品科学, 2015, 36(1): 109-112.
    [6]
    CHEN X X, CHANG Y L, YONG Y. Effects of Cd and Zn on oxygen consumption and ammonia excretion in sipuncula (Phascolosoma esculenta)[J]. Ecotox Environ Saf, 2009, 72(2): 507-515.
    [7]
    蒋定文, 沈先荣, 贾福星, 等. 海洋星虫提取物的营养分析及免疫调节作用的初步观察[J]. 中国生化药物杂志, 2004, 25(2): 96-97.
    [8]
    沈先荣, 蒋定文, 贾福星, 等. 方格星虫延缓衰老作用研究[J]. 中国海洋药物, 2004, 23(1): 30-32.
    [9]
    彭晓娜, 雷晓凌. 方格星虫多糖对小鼠免疫活性的影响[J]. 广东海洋大学学报, 2007, 27(4): 54-57.
    [10]
    夏乾峰, 谭河林, 覃西, 等. 方格星虫多糖抗菌活性的初步研究[J]. 中国热带医学, 2007, 7(12): 2192-2193.
    [11]
    李珂娴, 沈先荣, 蒋定文, 等. 三产地方格星虫主要营养成分比较[J]. 海军医学杂志, 2010, 31(1): 1-3.
    [12]
    高岳, 林研彤, 侯淑敏, 等. 不同产地和养殖方式的刺参微量元素含量的比较[J]. 大连海洋大学学报, 2014, 29(5): 498-501.
    [13]
    李俊伟, 朱长波, 郭永坚, 等. 光裸方格星虫对3种不同底质的适应能力[J]. 渔业科学进展, 2015, 36(6): 95-99.
    [14]
    HOWELL K L, POND D W, BILLETT D S M, et al. Feeding ecology of deep-sea seastars (Echinodermata: Asteroidea): a fatty-acid biomarker approach[J]. Mar Ecol Prog Ser, 2003, 255(6): 193-206.
    [15]
    董兰芳, 张琴, 童潼, 等. 不同生长发育阶段方格星虫氨基酸组成的研究[J]. 南方水产科学, 2012, 8(5): 60-65.
    [16]
    刘欣, 葛雅辉, 唐于平, 等. 不同产地裸体方格星虫脂肪酸类成分资源化学评价研究[J]. 中国海洋药物, 2017, 36(3): 1-10.
    [17]
    Association of Official Analytical Chemists. AOAC 996.06 Fat (total, saturated, and unsaturated) in foods, hydrolytic extraction gas chromatographic method[S]. Maryland, USA: AOAC International, 2002.
    [18]
    BUDGE S M, PARRISH C C, MCKENZIE C H. Fatty acid composition of phytoplankton, settling particulate matter and sediments at a sheltered bivalve aquaculture site[J]. Mar Chem, 2001, 76(8): 285-303.
    [19]
    李俊伟. 刺参-海蜇-对虾综合养殖系统和投喂鲜活硅藻养参系统的碳氮磷收支[D]. 青岛: 中国海洋大学, 2013: 51-58.
    [20]
    宋志东, 王际英, 王世信, 等. 不同生长发育阶段刺参体壁营养成分及氨基酸组成比较分析[J]. 水产科技情报, 2009, 3(1): 11-13.
    [21]
    黄晓春, 苏秀榕, 苏月萍. 沙蚕和星虫的营养成分研究[J]. 水产科学, 2005, 24(6): 10-11.
    [22]
    张桂和, 李理, 赵谋明, 等. 方格星虫营养成分分析及抗疲劳作用研究[J]. 营养学报, 2008, 30(3): 318-320.
    [23]
    罗少杰, 杨创业, 王庆恒, 等. 光裸星虫4个野生群体的营养成分分析与品质评价[J]. 广东海洋大学学报, 2016, 36(1): 25-30.
    [24]
    许明珠, 张琴, 童潼, 等. 饲料中硒含量对方格星虫稚虫生长、体成分、组织硒含量及相关酶活性的影响[J]. 动物营养学报, 2015, 27(6): 1733-1739.
    [25]
    许明珠, 张琴, 童潼, 等. 饲料锌含量对方格星虫稚虫生长性能、体成分、体腔液中锌含量及碱性磷酸酶活性的影响[J]. 动物营养学报, 2016, 28(7): 2292-2299.
    [26]
    HSIEH I T, MOK H K, KO F C, et al. Environmental assessment of trace element bioaccumulation in sipunculan from seagrass and wetland sediments[J]. Environ Monit Assess, 2013, 185(3): 2269-2279.
    [27]
    LI J W, XIE X Y, ZHU C B, et al. Edible peanut worm (Sipunculus nudus) in the Beibu Gulf: resource, aquaculture, ecological impact and counterplan[J]. J Ocean U China, 2017, 16(5): 823-830.
    [28]
    许明珠, 张琴, 童潼, 等. 饲料铁水平对方格星虫稚虫生长性能、体成分、酶活性及组织铁含量的影响[J]. 动物营养学报, 2014, 26(11): 3325-3331.
    [29]
    WANG F, WANG W X, HUANG X P. Spatial distribution of gut juice extractable Cu, Pb and Zn in sediments from the Pearl River Estuary, Southern China[J]. Mar Environ Res, 2012, 77(6): 112-119.
  • Related Articles

    [1]YIN Xingjun, HUA Chuanxiang, ZHU Qingcheng. Analysis of morphological differences and discrimination between female and male Cololabis saira based on geometric morphometrics[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2024, 20(6): 104-111. DOI: 10.12131/20240077
    [2]ZHANG Yuqing, GUO Huayang, ZHANG Nan, LIU Baosuo, ZHU Kecheng, XIAN Lin, ZHU Tengfei, ZHANG Dianchang. Path analysis of partial growth-related traits for wild large yellow croaker (Larimichthys crocea) of different geographical populations[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2024, 20(3): 112-119. DOI: 10.12131/20230203
    [3]XIA Feiyu, ZHANG Xiumei, XU Pian, XU Ying, WANG Yihang. Comparative analysis of shell frame characteristics and mitochondrial 16S rRNA gene between wild and cultured mussels (Mytilus coruscus)[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2023, 19(5): 168-176. DOI: 10.12131/20230096
    [4]GAO Jin, WANG Yongbo, LIU Jinye, GUO Yilan, FU Shuyuan. Transcriptome analysis of Plectropomus leopardus liver under different flow velocity[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2022, 18(1): 107-117. DOI: 10.12131/20210125
    [5]Jiangtao LI, Kaiyu YANG, Xiaotong QIU, Junchao FANG, Feifei HUANG, Xiaolong QIU, Xiaojing LYU, Rishen LIANG, Qingqing LI, Li LIN. Comparison of growth and morphological characteristics of inbred and hybrid families of Micropterus salmoides from Foshan and Taiwan populations[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2021, 17(5): 1-9. DOI: 10.12131/20200262
    [6]WEI Lei, ZHU Shuqin, LIU Wei, ZHAO Jinliang, QIAN Yezhou, WU Chao, QIAN De. Comparison on morphology and body spots characteristics between backcross progenies and their parents of mandarin fish[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2020, 16(2): 1-7. DOI: 10.12131/20190219
    [7]GONG Fahui, ZHANG Dianchang, LIU Tiantian, ZHANG Nan, GUO Huayang, ZHOU Falin, HAUNG Jianhua, JIANG Shigui. Morphological comparative research of Metupenaeus ensis stocks in southeast coast of China[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2016, 12(6): 76-82. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-0780.2016.06.010
    [8]WANG Xu, XU Heng, ZOU Li, DU Xiao, WANG Fengli, ZHENG Wei, HAN Zhiqiang, SHUI Bonian. Morphological variation analysis of three differente geographic populations of Monodonta labio[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2013, 9(4): 22-27. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-0780.2013.04.004
    [9]HAN Zhen, XIAO Yongshuang, GAO Tianxiang. Comparison of morphological characteristics of 9 Larimichthys polyactis populations in China[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2012, 8(3): 25-33. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-0780.2012.03.004
    [10]ZHANG Wei, LI Chunhou, JIA Xiaoping, CHEN Peimao, FANG Liang. Multivariate analysis of organisms communities attached on concrete and iron reefs[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2009, 5(3): 30-35. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-2227.2009.03.005
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(12)

    1. 张方琪,陈嘉娴,候勇康,王丽君,廖韬梁,栗志民. 北部湾海域不同地理群体西施舌表型性状的相关性与通径分析. 中国渔业质量与标准. 2024(05): 17-25 .
    2. 王雨吉,孟学平,易乐飞. 基于转录组西施舌微卫星标记开发及隐种鉴定. 水产科学. 2022(02): 289-295 .
    3. 陈健,郭丹,翟子钦,喻达辉,白丽蓉. 西施舌形态性状与体质量性状的相关性分析. 南方水产科学. 2021(01): 45-51 . 本站查看
    4. 林建杰. 福建长乐西施舌资源现状及保护成效研究. 应用海洋学学报. 2020(04): 551-558 .
    5. 陈薛伟杰,郭健康,杨志,曹恒源,安苗. 贵州境内3个野生大眼鳜群体的形态差异. 中国水产科学. 2018(01): 34-43 .
    6. 朱明,申欣,朱笑琳,屠海淼,杨婕,孟学平. 西施舌3个群体H2A基因和nad6-nad1片段序列比较研究. 海洋科学. 2015(09): 26-32 .
    7. 孟学平,申欣,屠海淼,朱笑琳,赵娜娜,程汉良,阎斌论. 基于nad5的西施舌漳州群体遗传分化水平分析——以蛤蜊属2个物种差异水平为参照. 生态学报. 2015(08): 2635-2642 .
    8. 杨璐,陈明茹,杨圣云,胡文佳,程建新,叶观琼,纪雅宁,鲍姗姗. 水产种质资源保护区适应性管理研究. 海洋环境科学. 2014(01): 122-129 .
    9. 赵娜娜,孟学平,申欣,程汉良,于清,刘兆普. 两株西施舌内脏团细菌的分离及初步鉴定. 水产科学. 2013(02): 93-97 .
    10. 王旭,徐衡,邹莉,杜肖,王凤丽,郑伟,韩志强,水柏年. 3个单齿螺地理群体形态差异分析. 南方水产科学. 2013(04): 22-27 . 本站查看
    11. 孟学平,申欣,赵娜娜,田美,梁猛,郝珏,程汉良,阎斌伦,董志国. 漳州西施舌线粒体基因组全序列:腔蛤蜊属(Coelomactra)存在新种的证据. 海洋学报(中文版). 2013(03): 204-214 .
    12. 孟学平,申欣,赵娜娜,田美,曾云,陈建安,董志国,程汉良,阎斌伦. 基于ITS2和16S rRNA的西施舌群体遗传差异分析. 生态学报. 2013(24): 7882-7891 .

    Other cited types(4)

Catalog

    Article views (3447) PDF downloads (161) Cited by(16)
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return