Volume 10 Issue 6
Dec.  2014
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Abstract
References
PENG Xuan, MA Shengwei, CHEN Haigang, ZHANG Zhe, ZHOU Yanbo, CAI Wengui. Spatial distribution and assessment of nutrients in marine ranching in Zhelin Bay-Nanao Island in summer[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2014, 10(6): 27-35. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-0780.2014.06.004
Citation: PENG Xuan, MA Shengwei, CHEN Haigang, ZHANG Zhe, ZHOU Yanbo, CAI Wengui. Spatial distribution and assessment of nutrients in marine ranching in Zhelin Bay-Nanao Island in summer[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2014, 10(6): 27-35. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-0780.2014.06.004
shu

Spatial distribution and assessment of nutrients in marine ranching in Zhelin Bay-Nanao Island in summer

  • 1.

    Scientific Observing and Experimental Station of South China Sea Fishery Resources & Environments, Ministry of Agriculture; Key Lab. of Fishery Ecology and Environment, Guangdong Province; South China Sea Fisheries Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, Guangzhou 510300, China

  • 2.

    Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai 201306, China

More Information
  • Received Date: April 13, 2014
  • Revised Date: May 22, 2014
    Graphical Abstract
    • Abstract

  • The marine ranching in Zhelin Bay-Nanao Island is divided into four different function areas: cage culture area, shellfish farming area, seaweed culture area and artificial reef area. Based on the survey data in that marine ranching in August of 2011, we analyzed the spatial distribution characteristics of nutrients in the surface seawater and evaluated the nutritional status. The results show that the contents of dissolved inorganic nitrogen (DIN) and active phosphate (PO4-P) decreased from the northwest of Zhelin Bay to the southeast of the investigated area. Among the four different function areas, the high-value of DIN and PO4-P occurred in the cage culture area, while the maximum content of silicate (SiO3-Si) was occurred in the shellfish framing area. Nutrient salts levels in the artificial reef area were relatively low. We assessed the sea water quality in the marine ranching by using single factor index, share rate of pollutants and comprehensive pollution index. The results suggest that the nutrient pollution trend caused by DIN and PO4-P in the marine ranching declined from the northwest to the southeast and from inshore to offshore waters. Moreover, the pollution and eutrophication state in the cage culture area was most serious, followed by the shellfish farming area, while the artificial reef area and control area were found for less pollution.

    • FullText(HTML)
    • References (46)
  • [1]
    黄宗国. 海洋生物学辞典[M]. 北京: 海洋出版社, 2002: 224.
    [2]
    BARTLEY D M, HOEELL B R, MOSKNESS E, et al. Marine ranching: a global perspective[C]//Stock enhancement and sea ranching: 1st International Symposium on Stock Enhancement and Sea Ranching, Bergen, Norway, September 8-11, 1997. Fishing News Books Ltd., 1999: 79-90. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Marine-ranching%3A-a-global-perspective.-Bartley-Howell/4326fd962fb8acd012125de075b544e1c9a497a4
    [3]
    RILOV G, BENAYAHU Y. Fish assemblage on natural versus vertical artificial reefs: the rehabilitation perspective[J]. Mar Biol, 2000, 136(5): 931-942. doi: 10.1007/s002279900250
    [4]
    贾晓平, 陈丕茂, 蔡文贵, 等. 人工鱼礁关键技术研究与示范[M]. 北京: 海洋出版社, 2011: 127-185. https://kns.cnki.net/kcms2/article/abstract?v=MdENDFpkZq6jnIyP6HvUZHcLScQwxeW2gn-mEbfy1dd6iUbX4HzI_UFrfmF-ZiI6-dkSBlvIQr4doON4fMsrLsm1Ca6ClWxCEfczmuRD03DogpzsgEWKVZHdpC21NHzeTFC3l2k6sfpkcdBEPI1k4guQyTxIjiMCsjHrh2plhOFM3pJnevOyaJDsMeo2puSI&uniplatform=NZKPT&language=CHS
    [5]
    焦金菊, 潘永玺, 孙利元, 等. 人工鱼礁区的增殖鱼类资源效果初步研究[J]. 水产科学, 2011, 30(2): 79-82. doi: 10.16378/j.cnki.1003-1111.2011.02.006
    [6]
    黄长江, 董巧香, 郑磊. 1997年中国东南沿海大规模赤潮原因生物的形态分类与生态学特征[J]. 海洋与湖沼, 1999, 30(6): 581-590. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0029-814X.1999.06.001
    [7]
    何家菀, 施之新, 张银华, 等. 一种棕囊藻的形态特征与毒素分析[J]. 海洋与湖沼, 1999, 30(2): 172-179. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0029-814X.1999.02.010
    [8]
    赖文学, 陈伟洲. 南澳岛海水生态养殖的进展和研究[J]. 水产科技, 2006(2): 33-34. https://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/periodical/Ch9QZXJpb2RpY2FsQ0hJTmV3UzIwMjQxMTA1MTcxMzA0Eg5RSzIwMDYwMjI4ODY4NBoIZ2tzNjRjOTM%3D
    [9]
    国家海洋局. 海洋监测规范GB 17378.3-2007[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2007. https://std.samr.gov.cn/gb/search/gbDetailed?id=71F772D7898AD3A7E05397BE0A0AB82A
    [10]
    国家海洋局. 海洋监测规范GB 17378.4-2007[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2007. https://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/standard/GB%2017378.4-2007
    [11]
    国家海洋局. 海洋监测规范GB 17378.7-2007[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2007. https://std.samr.gov.cn/gb/search/gbDetailed?id=71F772D76774D3A7E05397BE0A0AB82A
    [12]
    付会, 孙英兰, 孙磊. 灰色关联分析法在海洋环境质量评价中的应用[J]. 海洋湖沼通报, 2007(3): 127-131. doi: 10.13984/j.cnki.cn37-1141.2007.03.015
    [13]
    郭良波. 模糊数学在海洋环境评价中的应用[J]. 南阳理工学院学报, 2010, 2(2): 83-86. doi: 10.16827/j.cnki.41-1404/z.2010.02.023
    [14]
    吴凤霞, 李纯厚, 戴明. 人工神经网络在海洋科学中的应用[J]. 南方水产, 2009, 5(1): 75-80. https://kns.cnki.net/kcms2/article/abstract?v=MdENDFpkZq6OS2SN5DHfBtcSuz199EqWVQtRXEcHOjMgbWfrHjOaHCNWL9e4tO_P7m6InbxoJXxUSuBsP9mgPzHHb9qcrJj63QapVpbxyj5HhCjVzABrxfakgfzt2j0zMkcoPxyy7TQDZ0pPxnW6UzFnAN08orO17XBGz5sl8_QJrke8dnJwhM-GNS-uOD56&uniplatform=NZKPT&language=CHS
    [15]
    徐祖信. 我国河流单因子水质标识指数评价方法研究[J]. 同济大学学报: 自然科学版, 2005, 33(3): 321-325. https://kns.cnki.net/kcms2/article/abstract?v=MdENDFpkZq78RNb4AInEs_5brXugCPAIa12vmf1iODkiL5s5RmR5rNHWZTEPE16ZFQyMaa67fBxYvjGCzWRHllR53e88jyj-Wts-vygphhFxuwiLw1Chm6AcXLYpcly68-UYgq78_DUjxrCub0cuitt-zVrsJQqwM9gy0S5kMeE_lAV28JIM6peYsGx6xkff&uniplatform=NZKPT&language=CHS
    [16]
    张彩香, 王焰新, 张兆年. 因子分析法在黄柏河下游水质评价中的应用[J]. 水资源保护, 2005, 21(4): 11-14. https://kns.cnki.net/kcms2/article/abstract?v=MdENDFpkZq4R8eS9AHLp7iIognSC3fDnP--3BOdm1KrcPqxjRPNuMQQctZ307l0bWhjAWLkB2cgUktUaOZa5NDcg-gFKC7Jv570UL4h0wciDnH9wK-bUoUnnblWVi4sv6LlcnOt5Ck_72AOMbBk1yXtjIphIH9i90-xBVLnXTauRhTXSO6ld5KX_ANFAEKzu&uniplatform=NZKPT&language=CHS
    [17]
    陆卫军, 张涛. 几种河流水质评价方法的比较分析[J]. 环境科学与管理, 2009, 34(6): 174-176. https://kns.cnki.net/kcms2/article/abstract?v=MdENDFpkZq4Hn-ojM7R3AjPn0d7J-mGrVT1AgigQhZB-MWtJhMCw2cvk3ao0mpWQpqUnImH6D-qImOg7wTOuY15JqZoAG4klJpXbnGh67Hb1wsac8D_8Viz3D4RXI4W2rHxIf34IxhKzttbbwvQ6An5fxadfdfXef0bbvmeU-qSELIn-DZ9SsjqUknPCoWL_&uniplatform=NZKPT&language=CHS
    [18]
    曾永, 樊引琴, 王丽伟, 等. 水质模糊综合评价法与单因子指数评价法比较[J]. 人民黄河, 2007, 29(2): 64-65. https://kns.cnki.net/kcms2/article/abstract?v=MdENDFpkZq6CoX_kTFvC61Lc4IfXLaCEdRuhnJ6MdGfB33kTCKdzryahDs3rycOdngwAsWJAbIcqY8sXRi6-vQdSTF1G-d-KDfr6kwgKG1EAtHQ8-ndRMk87mwL8I-zH7jHKJsPTwbb8jE7b2sR3gkTId2OnJXKvYMc-XvotIT8OmnMvs70eCbdM9rWTWnRN&uniplatform=NZKPT&language=CHS
    [19]
    GB 3097-1997, 海水水质标准[S]. 1997. https://www.mee.gov.cn/ywgz/fgbz/bz/bzwb/shjbh/shjzlbz/199807/W020061027511546974673.pdf
    [20]
    梁擎, 冯健, 彭文启, 等. 分担率法在洱海水环境容量计算中的应用[J]. 人民黄河, 2012, 34(6): 92-94. https://kns.cnki.net/kcms2/article/abstract?v=MdENDFpkZq7eQHbA_DDlUFOcN7PiuHevy5VpOxXAaGFMCwohyuULcICXa0XWFpSWpFNbaC6PWEQn9jAVxUSN2-TTJb1oOF49zgoiRwHGPxxn2213PqTtOxgtnv5H0_jvinDxVJyOparQZdDBjikCoHRgPlXDKklfrTIPzh7BAXM4lfl8Eng3vO53qSPwMt8A&uniplatform=NZKPT&language=CHS
    [21]
    朱灵峰, 王燕, 王阳阳, 等. 基于单因子指数法的海浪河水质评价[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2012, 40(3): 326-327. doi: 10.15889/j.issn.1002-1302.2012.03.027
    [22]
    邹景忠, 董丽萍, 秦保平. 渤海湾富营养化和赤潮问题的初步探讨[J]. 海洋环境科学, 1983, 2(2): 41-54. https://kns.cnki.net/kcms2/article/abstract?v=MdENDFpkZq59TIjAX-rF-IfOS2-P2h9hscwqnqDSaHoqXWEJp6J6wBV1BuU6P164P8xz7nDpTFg281uT2vwpz9S6kGpWBsrVi78s2fqxwUkfo8dWDnq5k8ysoK2THezFDM5-PkyF6UTegVp3PH4Cs0SlXwaTo6TIYlmYXGRQ4E_dRvfCYr1Xhd2R5WWw1eLv&uniplatform=NZKPT&language=CHS
    [23]
    周凯, 姜胜. 粤东柘林湾无机氮的时空分布特征[J]. 生态科学, 2002, 21(2): 121-125. https://kns.cnki.net/kcms2/article/abstract?v=MdENDFpkZq49JkQNLHIg3gC8o_A_81n4SZawyoMEBT0V1uO6X7_BUZoo8BI04elhhh1T81Ec2EIIvNuwSxIeU1LxGHAGiwq_BxH_XET6Z2b2PlhaxhlcPKkVq1EXPyVBYT5BN4IaEixot6MDZeb3ZDMzLqAqMkyB6W5fgktzxEmweC5Nf1nhnKAlBX-tRtl4&uniplatform=NZKPT&language=CHS
    [24]
    周凯, 黄长江, 姜胜, 等. 2000~2001年粤东柘林湾营养盐分布[J]. 生态学报, 2002, 22(12): 2116-2124. https://kns.cnki.net/kcms2/article/abstract?v=MdENDFpkZq7bfSbLgMdMNO_wHkY7xQU-X-c-76pyZtCr26Qw0QVSTj8dSiHlAsx9rkx0olVib73t2BsCHgEbdgyMDdPLr7bS-sgLD91KB6oO2JE0tWXSZRIidS-IdpQK4afIX5JUo24VudVkk-AWbSE-pXy-tgKQAatkJRUq5VkG3u9ivPBerW8VHzlzL-11&uniplatform=NZKPT&language=CHS
    [25]
    黄长江, 杜虹, 陈善文, 等. 2001-2002年柘林湾大量营养盐的时空分布[J]. 海洋与湖沼, 2004, 35(1): 21-29. https://kns.cnki.net/kcms2/article/abstract?v=MdENDFpkZq6u4GyubOH1ta3FCJOmBuzXayIIDXvtJvJcjvun_FivKKNIV3i0MvI-FhH5qb5KRo91aXFfDZJ-z8Ab_96dVn86evwzYjspsz4H9IS3c3Rdnm9mrlpq8H2IgQ24P0YozPqMLccg8_lQD-iZuL0YaRT3TC4o6th0UKBp-Aynxz0rzFb8frlO4riv&uniplatform=NZKPT&language=CHS
    [26]
    陈晨, 杨桂朋, 高先池, 等. 胶州湾微表层和次表层海水中营养盐的分布特征及富营养化研究[J]. 环境科学学报, 2012, 32(8): 1856-1865. doi: 10.13671/j.hjkxxb.2012.08.016
    [27]
    陈海刚, 马胜伟, 蔡文贵, 等. 粤东柘林湾附近海域人工鱼礁投放前海水环境质量分析与评价[J]. 海洋环境科学, 2011, 30(1): 48-51. https://kns.cnki.net/kcms2/article/abstract?v=MdENDFpkZq6qgJoXx4uv9WxptkBGArotpWFN0Cq5Gtnl5fQ_UmpH-9z13bpcPbNx_To3hkzRUzmYogL8z4dxE_uJyvHNwmS773lLGCKg1yE1dpP_2MrzlgXcDFI7ilNHcc2x1Ym03HhhthbO43jKjuRsqrP5tukqSDBI_1XtJ27jPtc7mLS8mh3gZavKWu2I&uniplatform=NZKPT&language=CHS
    [28]
    宋秀凯, 刘爱英, 马元庆, 等. 东营近海枯水期浮游生物群落特征研究[J]. 海洋湖沼通报, 2010 (1): 95-102.
    [29]
    TIMOTHY A, RENATE V, REBECCA Z. Influence of nutrient availability on phytoplankton growth and community structure in the Port Adelaide River, Australia: bioassay assessment of potential nutrient limitation[J]. Hydrobiologia, 2000, 429(1/2/3): 89-103. doi: 10.1023/A:1004024630413
    [30]
    DORTCH Q, PACKARD T T. Differences in biomass structure between oligotrophic and eutrophic marine ecosystems [J]. Deep-Sea Res, 1989, 36(2): 223-240. doi: 10.1016/0198-0149(89)90135-0
    [31]
    JUSTIC D, RABALAIS N N, TURNER R E. Stoichiometric nutrient balance and origin of coastal eutrophication [J]. Mar Pollut Bull, 1995, 30(1): 41-46. doi: 10.1016/0025-326X(94)00105-I
    [32]
    BRONK D A, GLIBERT P M. Nitrogen uptake, dissolved organic nitrogen release, and new production [J]. Science, 1994, 265(5180): 1843-1846. doi: 10.1126/science.265.5180.1843
    [33]
    冯士笮, 李凤岐, 李少菁. 海洋科学导论[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 1999: 503.
    [34]
    BALODE M, PURINA I, BECHEMIN C, et al. Effects of nutrient enrichment of the growth rates and community structure of summer phytoplankton from the Gulf of Riga, Baltic Sea [J]. J Plankton Res, 1998, 20(12): 2251-2272. doi: 10.1093/plankt/20.12.2251
    [35]
    陈玮, 吕振波. 威海湾营养盐季节变化特征及与环境因子的相关性分析[J]. 水生态学杂志, 2012, 33(3): 41-45. https://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/periodical/Ch9QZXJpb2RpY2FsQ0hJTmV3UzIwMjQxMTA1MTcxMzA0Eg9zc3R4enoyMDEyMDMwMDcaCHF1NWx2aTJ3
    [36]
    王艳玲, 王进生, 安文超. 胶州湾水质及主要营养盐季节性变化分析[J]. 中国环境管理干部学院学报, 2012, 22(3): 50-54. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-813X.2012.03.015
    [37]
    张传松, 王修林, 石晓勇, 等. 东海赤潮高发区营养盐时空分布特征及其与赤潮的关系[J]. 环境科学, 2007, 28(11): 2416-2424. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0250-3301.2007.11.002
    [38]
    房燕, 吕振波, 张焕君, 等. 荣成湾营养盐分布和变化特征[J]. 海洋湖沼通报, 2012(3): 81-89. https://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/periodical/Ch9QZXJpb2RpY2FsQ0hJTmV3UzIwMjQxMTA1MTcxMzA0Eg9oeWh6dGIyMDEyMDMwMTIaCDdiZnAxcDY2
    [39]
    颜利, 蒋金龙, 詹兴旺, 等. 泉州湾表层水主要化学要素含量和富营养化指数的时空变化特征[J]. 台湾海峡, 2012, 31(4): 459-464. https://www.zhangqiaokeyan.com/academic-journal-cn_journal-applied-oceanography_thesis/0201254265437.html
    [40]
    杨东方. 浮游植物的生态与地球生态系统的机制[M]. 北京: 海洋出版社, 2009: 68.
    [41]
    RANCH. 海洋牧场专项2011年年度进展[DB/OL]. (2012-05-04)[2013-04-16]. http://ranch.scsfri.ac.cn/index.aspx.
    [42]
    廖洋, 施玥. 北菜南栽龙须菜定居南澳十三年[N]. 中国科学报, 2013-06-12(3).
    [43]
    李杰, 雷驰宙, 陈伟洲. 南澳贝藻混养互利机制的初步研究[J]. 水产科学, 2012, 31(8): 449-453. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-1111.2012.08.001
    [44]
    王翔宇, 詹冬梅, 李美真, 等. 大型海藻吸收氮磷营养盐能力的初步研究[J]. 渔业科学进展, 2011, 32(4): 67-71. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7075.2011.04.011
    [45]
    陈丽巍, 邹定辉, 刘兆普, 等. 不同N、P水平对龙须菜生长及生理生化特征的影响[J]. 海洋环境科学, 2011, 30(2): 211-215. https://www.cqvip.com/qk/95945x/201102/37505624.html
    [46]
    陈勇, 于长清, 张国胜, 等. 人工鱼礁的环境功能与集鱼效果[J]. 大连水产学院学报, 2002, 17(1): 64-69. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-9957.2002.01.012
    • Related Articles

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(23)

    1. 章欣仪，郑春芳，秦松，刘伟成，张川，范青松. 基于Ecopath模型的瓯江口斑鰶、刀鲚和鮻的增殖生态容量评估. 水产学报. 2025(02): 97-108 .
    2. 周维维，王晓波，韩庆喜. 温州瓯江口春、秋季主要游泳动物生态位及其分化. 海洋通报. 2024(01): 59-68 .
    3. 邹沁东，汪振华，章守宇，程晓鹏，陈怡卉，周怡. 大陈岛礁海域鱼类群落结构特征. 生态学杂志. 2024(03): 795-803 .
    4. 章欣仪，刘伟成，张川，范青松，叶深，郑春芳. 基于鱼类完整性指数的瓯江口水域生态系统健康评价. 水生态学杂志. 2024(06): 47-56 .
    5. 周维维，王晓波，韩庆喜. 浙江梅山岛附近海域大型底栖动物和游泳动物的群落组成及其与环境因子的关系. 宁波大学学报(理工版). 2023(02): 31-41 .
    6. 刘勇，庄之栋，马超，徐春燕，沈长春，蔡建堤，谢少卿. 厦漳近海游泳动物群落结构特征初步研究. 海洋湖沼通报. 2023(04): 122-127 .
    7. 马路阔，陈全震，程方平，彭欣，陈伟峰，曾江宁，史西志，黄伟. 三门湾游泳动物群落结构与生物多样性研究. 海洋与湖沼. 2022(02): 384-393 .
    8. 章凯，王晶，胡成业，张丽源，周泽宇，水柏年. 温台渔场产卵场保护区春秋季游泳动物群落结构与环境因子的关系. 大连海洋大学学报. 2022(06): 1032-1039 .
    9. 俞松立，王咏雪，韩晓凤，章翊涵，来洪运，章凯，张丽源，水柏年. 三门湾海域渔业生物群落结构及营养级变化特征. 大连海洋大学学报. 2021(03): 478-487 .
    10. 虞为，吴进喜，林黑着，文国樑，曹煜成，黄小林，黄忠，杨育凯，李涛，赵旺. 丁香酚对花鲈幼鱼的麻醉效果. 河北渔业. 2020(04): 4-7+11 .
    11. 颜文超，宋伟华，俞存根，周青松，郑基，刘惠，邓小艳，张平. 瓯江口春秋季虾蟹类群落结构. 上海海洋大学学报. 2019(01): 134-144 .
    12. 梁海，王咏雪，求锦津，张苗苗，俞松立，韩晓凤，章翊涵，来洪运，蒋宇轩，水柏年. 台州益顽湾海域主要游泳动物生态位与种间相遇机率. 中国水产科学. 2019(02): 353-361 .
    13. 范青松，李昌达，叶深，林振士，秦松，彭欣. 浙南洞头周边海域冬春季游泳动物种类组成及群落结构. 水产科技情报. 2019(04): 224-229 .
    14. 周昊昊，杜嘉，南颖，宋开山，赵博宇，项小云. 1980年以来5个时期珠江三角洲滨海湿地景观格局及其变化特征. 湿地科学. 2019(05): 559-566 .
    15. 梁海，王咏雪，水柏年，求锦津，张苗苗，俞松立，韩晓凤，章翊涵，来洪运. 台州南部近岸及其附近海域游泳动物群落结构及多样性. 浙江海洋大学学报(自然科学版). 2019(06): 495-501+522 .
    16. 李富祥，王鹏飞，闫路路，邱丽华. 花鲈irak4基因cDNA的克隆与表达分析. 南方水产科学. 2018(05): 70-79 . 本站查看
    17. 杨杰青，史赟荣，沈新强，王云龙. 湄洲湾海域甲壳动物群落多样性分析. 南方水产科学. 2017(05): 16-24 . 本站查看
    18. 董静瑞，胡成业，水玉跃，田阔，杜肖，水柏年. 温州南部沿岸海域鱼类群落特征及其与环境因子的关系. 中国水产科学. 2017(02): 209-219 .
    19. 李超男，水柏年，水玉跃，求锦津，张苗苗，田嘉琦，聂振林，田阔. 温州瓯飞滩邻近海域主要游泳动物群落结构. 中国水产科学. 2017(06): 1332-1341 .
    20. 晏磊，李亚男，谭永光，杨吝，杨炳忠，张鹏，陈森，李杰. 南海北部龙头鱼刺网网目选择性研究. 南方水产科学. 2016(02): 75-80 . 本站查看
    21. 冀萌萌，田阔，胡成业，张春草，覃胡林，水柏年. 三门湾春、秋季游泳动物群落组成及物种多样性研究. 水生态学杂志. 2016(02): 42-48 .
    22. 王淼，洪波，孙振中. 春、夏季杭州湾口门区鱼类资源数量与多样性的时空分布特征. 中国农学通报. 2016(20): 11-16 .
    23. 于杰，陈作志，徐姗楠. 围填海对珠江口南沙湿地资源与生物资源的影响. 中国水产科学. 2016(03): 661-671 .

    Other cited types(8)

Catalog

    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML
    Article views (3703) PDF downloads (1862) Cited by(31)
    Related

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co., Ltd.  

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return