Volume 19 Issue 6
Dec.  2023
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Abstract
References
Related Articles
YANG Ling, LIU Yiming, XU Bingjie, WANG Chaoqi, WU Tao, XING Qinggan, PEI Kun, WEI Chaomin, ZENG Shangwei, PAN Ying. Nursery and adult culture experiments of Tapes dorsatus in Beihai, Fangchenggang and Qinzhou sea areas[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2023, 19(6): 38-50. DOI: 10.12131/20230145
Citation: YANG Ling, LIU Yiming, XU Bingjie, WANG Chaoqi, WU Tao, XING Qinggan, PEI Kun, WEI Chaomin, ZENG Shangwei, PAN Ying. Nursery and adult culture experiments of Tapes dorsatus in Beihai, Fangchenggang and Qinzhou sea areas[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2023, 19(6): 38-50. DOI: 10.12131/20230145
shu

Nursery and adult culture experiments of Tapes dorsatus in Beihai, Fangchenggang and Qinzhou sea areas

  • 1.

    College of Animal Science and Technology, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China

  • 2.

    Key Laboratory of Aquatic Healthy Breeding and Nutrition Regulation of Guangxi Universities, Nanning 530004, China

  • 3.

    Fangchenggang Fishery Technology Promotion Station, Fangchenggang 538021, China

More Information
  • Received Date: July 30, 2023
  • Revised Date: August 11, 2023
  • Accepted Date: August 30, 2023
  • Available Online: September 02, 2023
    Graphical Abstract
    • Abstract

  • In order to explore the suitable breeding density and effective culture mode of Tapes dorsatus in three sea areas of Beibu Gulf, Guangxi, we had carried out basket nursery culture, basket adult culture and net cage hanging experiments of T. dorsatus in mudflat of three sea areas in Qingzhou, Beihai and Fangchenggang from May 2021 to January 2023. The results show that: 1) The suitable nursery culture density for T. dorsatus were 2 000, 1 500 and 1 500 grains·basket−1, respectively, and the growth indexes and survival rate of T. dorsatus decreased with the increase of nursery culture density. The survival rates of all density groups in Beihai were significantly better than those in Fangchenggang and Qinzhou (P<0.05). Except that the growth indexes (Shell length, shell width and body mass) in d5 group (3 000 grains·basket−1) in Beihai were lower than that in Fangchenggang, the growth indexes of other groups were all higher than those of Fangchenggang and Qinzhou. 2) The suitable culture densities of T. dorsatus in Beihai, Fangchenggang and Qinzhou were 40, 40 and 20 grains·basket−1, respectively. The growth indexes and survival rate of T. dorsatus at adult stage were Beihai>Fangchenggang>Qinzhou, and the survival rate decreased with the increase of cultivation density. When the density of net cage suspension in Fangchenggang was 30 grains· cage−1, all growth indexes were the highest. There were no significant differences in shell length, shell width, shell height, body mass and survival rate among different density groups in net cage suspension (P>0.05). The results of environmental factors show that the water temperature, beach temperature, salinity, transparency, pH and DO in Beihai were slightly higher than those in Fangchenggang and Qinzhou, with relatively stable water quality. The water quality environment in Qinzhou and Fangchenggang changed greatly and was unstable. The diameter of plasmid at the bottom of Beihai mudflat was mainly coarse sand (49.00%), Fangchenggang was mainly composed of medium sand (59.28%), and Qinzhou was mainly composed of fine sand (77.33%). The results of phytoplankton quantity show that the species and quantity of phytoplankton algae in Beihai were the largest, and the least species and quantity of phytoplankton algae were in Qinzhou. The research indicates that T. dorsatus is suitable for nursery and adult culture in three sea areas of Beibu Gulf, and the breeding effect in Beihai is better than that in Fangchenggang and Qinzhou. Besides, 1.5-year-old T. dorsatus is suitable for net cage hanging culture in Fangchenggang sea area.

    • FullText(HTML)
    • References (35)
  • [1]
    庄启谦. 中国动物志 软体动物门 双壳纲 帘蛤科[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2001, 63-64.
    [2]
    黄洋, 杜涛, 杨世平. 钝缀锦蛤生态习性的初步研究[J]. 水产科学, 2008, 27(4): 175-178. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-1111.2008.04.004
    [3]
    杨家林, 邹杰, 彭慧婧. 温度、盐度和体质量对钝缀锦蛤滤食率和同化率的影响[J]. 水产科学, 2019, 38(1): 104-108. doi: 10.16378/j.cnki.1003-1111.2019.01.016
    [4]
    巫旗生, 祁剑飞, 宁岳, 等. 盐度、pH、氨氮对钝缀锦蛤稚贝生长及存活的影响[J]. 渔业研究, 2021, 43(6): 621-627.
    [5]
    张柯馨, 曹楚畑, 刘志刚, 等. 钝缀锦蛤 (Tapes dorsatus) 稚贝的温度和盐度耐受性研究[J]. 海洋学报, 2022, 44(4): 57-64.
    [6]
    NELL J A. Salinity studies on the clams Katelysia rhytiphora (Lamy) and Tapes dorsatus (Lamarck)[J]. Aquac Res, 1997, 28(2): 115-119. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2109.1997.tb01023.x
    [7]
    陈道海, 李洪英, 吴秋颖, 等. 10种帘蛤科贝类COI基因序列分析及系统发育研究[J]. 生物资源, 2018, 40(3): 277-284.
    [8]
    巫旗生, 曾志南, 宁岳, 等. 钝缀锦蛤形态性状对活体质量的影响[J]. 水产科学, 2018, 37(1): 110-114. doi: 10.16378/j.cnki.1003-1111.2018.01.017
    [9]
    巫旗生, 文宇, 曾志南, 等. 钝缀锦蛤繁殖周期和胚胎发育[J]. 中国水产科学, 2017, 24(3): 488-496.
    [10]
    连昌朋, 王超奇, 杨凌, 等. 广西北部湾钝缀锦蛤精巢发育、精子发生及超微结构研究[J]. 海洋科学, 2022, 46(6): 80-89.
    [11]
    连昌朋, 吴韬, 王超奇, 等. 广西北海营盘海域钝缀锦蛤(Tapes conspersus)卵巢发育、卵子和卵黄发生的研究[J]. 热带海洋学报, 2022, 41(5): 170-179. doi: 10.11978/2021185
    [12]
    张柯馨, 杨尚松, 罗泽鑫, 等. 钝缀锦蛤胚胎、幼虫及稚贝发育观察[J]. 水产科学, 2023, 42(4): 682-689. doi: 10.16378/j.cnki.1003-1111.21125
    [13]
    NELL J A, O'CONNOR W A, HAND R E, et al. Hatchery production of diploid and triploid clams, Tapes dorsatus (Lamarck 1818): a potential new species for aquaculture[J]. Aquaculture, 1995, 130(4): 389-394. doi: 10.1016/0044-8486(95)92761-Q
    [14]
    张柯馨, 罗泽鑫, 张元, 等. 钝缀锦蛤规模化人工育苗技术研究[J]. 南方水产科学, 2023, 19(3): 51-59. doi: 10.12131/20220262
    [15]
    PATERSON K J, NELL J A. Effect of different growing techniques and substrate types on the growth and survival of the clams Tapes dorsatus (Lamarck) and Katelysia rhytiphora (Lamy)[J]. Aquac Res, 1997, 28(9): 707-715. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2109.1997.tb01093.x
    [16]
    杨凌, 曾尚伟, 韦朝民, 等. 钝缀锦蛤海区中培筐式养殖及马氏珠母贝吊养养殖防风浪模式分析[J]. 渔业信息与战略, 2023, 38(1): 52-59. doi: 10.13233/j.cnki.fishis.2023.01.007
    [17]
    田园, 金燕, 陈炜, 等. 菲律宾蛤仔(Ruditapes philippinarum)“斑马蛤2号”筏式和底播养殖模式比较研究[J]. 海洋与湖沼, 2021, 52(6): 1496-1505. doi: 10.11693/hyhz20210500125
    [18]
    范斌朋, 王梅芳, 刘永, 等. 吊养和底播两种养殖方式对扁平钳蛤生长的影响[J]. 基因组学与应用生物学, 2016, 35(7): 1725-1730. doi: 10.13417/j.gab.035.001725
    [19]
    赵东波. 常用沉积物粒度分类命名方法探讨[J]. 海洋地质动态, 2009, 25(8): 41-44, 46. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-2722.2009.08.009
    [20]
    刘志刚, 刘建勇, 刘付少梅. 不同潮位、密度及季节对皱肋文蛤中间培育效果的影响[J]. 海洋科学, 2011, 35(10): 34-41.
    [21]
    李永仁, 梁健, 郭永军, 等. 天津沿海菲律宾蛤仔适养密度研究[J]. 海洋通报, 2015, 34(4): 470-474. doi: 10.11840/j.issn.1001-6392.2015.04.016
    [22]
    潘渊博, 孙秀俊, 郭贺, 等. 围隔生境下养殖密度对菲律宾蛤仔生长的影响[J]. 中国海洋大学学报(自然科学版), 2023, 53(1): 53-65. doi: 10.16441/j.cnki.hdxb.20220021
    [23]
    于佐安, 谭克非, 张明, 等. 筏式虾夷扇贝养成期不同密度生长与经济效益分析[J]. 水产学报, 2016, 40(10): 1624-1633.
    [24]
    刘德经, 张克存, 李正华. 放养密度对西施舌稚贝生长的影响[J]. 特产研究, 2008, 30(4): 14-16, 37. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4721.2008.04.004
    [25]
    何毛贤, 张红玉, 袁涛. 养殖密度、水层和养殖地点对马氏珠母贝选育群体生长存活的影响[J]. 热带海洋学报, 2009, 28(6): 68-71. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-5470.2009.06.009
    [26]
    栗志民, 刘志刚, 刘付少梅, 等. 中培期和养成期墨西哥湾扇贝(Argopecten irradians concentricus)新品系养殖密度的研究[J]. 海洋与湖沼, 2013, 44(6): 1557-1565. doi: 10.11693/hyhz20130306002
    [27]
    廖锐, 区又君, 勾效伟. 养殖密度对鱼类福利影响的研究进展I. 死亡率、生长、摄食以及应激反应[J]. 南方水产, 2006, 2(6): 76-80.
    [28]
    王超奇, 徐炳杰, 吴韬, 等. 广西北部湾滩涂施氏獭蛤中培及养成期养殖密度比较研究[J]. 南方水产科学, 2023, 19(4): 105-115. doi: 10.12131/20230046
    [29]
    蔡德建, 蒋艳, 杨家林, 等. 大獭蛤人工苗种浅海沉箱式中间培育试验研究[J]. 广西科学, 2010, 17(3): 263-266, 270. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-9164.2010.03.022
    [30]
    陈瑞芳, 刘海娟, 董兰芳, 等. 织锦巴非蛤海区悬挂养殖新模式[J]. 中国水产, 2022(7): 87-88. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-6681.2022.7.zhongguosc202207030
    [31]
    CHAUDHURI K, MANNA S, SARMA K S, et al. Physicochemical and biological factors controlling water column metabolism in Sundarbans estuary, India[J]. Aquat Biosyst, 2012, 8(1): 1-16. doi: 10.1186/2046-9063-8-1
    [32]
    李亚芳, 杜飞雁, 王亮根, 等. 底质类型对三亚湾潮间带大型底栖动物生态功能的影响[J]. 水产学报, 2018, 42(10): 1559-1571.
    [33]
    刘亦涵, 李由明, 付湘粤, 等. 基质粒径对缀锦蛤 (Taper literatus) 生长影响的分析[J]. 畜牧与饲料科学, 2018, 39(4): 15-17. doi: 10.12160/j.issn.1672-5190.2018.04.004
    [34]
    黄亚楠, 王文杰, 魏钰恒, 等. 墨西哥湾扇贝(Argopecten irradians concentricus) 选育系F7在广西北部湾海区的生长比较研究[J]. 海洋与湖沼, 2020, 51(5): 1222-1231. doi: 10.11693/hyhz20191200284
    [35]
    邱清波, 李由明, 吴丽云, 等. 干露对缀锦蛤、文蛤、美女蛤和织锦巴非蛤耗氧率的影响[J]. 海南热带海洋学院学报, 2018, 25(2): 20-24.
    • Related Articles

  • Related Articles

    [1]CHEN Xiaohong, SHEN Xiaona, XU Yibin, XU Cuiya, ZHENG Huidong. Analysis of tetrodotoxin and microbial community structure in Nassarius semiplicatus[J]. South China Fisheries Science. DOI: 10.12131/20240235
    [2]TIAN Tian, ZHANG Jianming, ZHANG Dezhi, ZHU Xin, LI Yang. Effect of mosaic disease on skin mucosa microbial community structure of Chinese sturgeon (Acipenser sinensis)[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2024, 20(5): 186-192. DOI: 10.12131/20240107
    [3]TIAN Tian, ZHANG Jianming, ZHU Xin, ZHANG Dezhi, SHU Tingting. Analysis of microbiammunl coity structure and potential pathogens in mucus, intestinal content of Acipenser dabryanus and culture water[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2023, 19(6): 71-83. DOI: 10.12131/20230092
    [4]WANG Yao, LI Hongyu, QI Xiangming, MAO Xiangzhao, DONG Hao, GUO Xiaohua. Analysis of solid-state anaerobic fermentation process of mackerel processing by-products by high-throughput sequencing[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2022, 18(4): 136-146. DOI: 10.12131/20210285
    [5]ZHANG Kai, LIN Yijing, LI Chenyang, LIU Fangling, SHEN Minghao, ZHENG Shanjian. Effects of different C/N ratios on formation of biofloc, water quality and microflora in aquaculture water of Chinemys reevesii[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2022, 18(4): 87-94. DOI: 10.12131/20200144
    [6]TAO Feiyan, PAN Chuang, CHEN Shengjun, HU Xiao, DENG Jianchao, LI Chunsheng, RONG Hui, WANG Yueqi. Microbial analysis of Litopenaeus vannamei during partial freezing storage by Illumina high throughput sequencing[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2021, 17(2): 104-113. DOI: 10.12131/20200211
    [7]SUN Yongxu, DONG Hongbiao, WANG Wenhao, CAO Ming, DUAN Yafei, LI Hua, LIU Qingsong, ZHANG Jiasong. Effects of periodic hypoxia stress on intestinal microflora structure of Lateolabrax maculatus[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2019, 15(4): 46-52. DOI: 10.12131/20190021
    [8]XIN Yanjie, HU Xiaojuan, CAO Yucheng, XU Yu, XU Yunna, SU Haochang, XU Chuangwen, WEN Guoliang, LI Zhuojia. Effects of inoculant of photosynthetic bacteria and Rhodopseudomonas palustris on nitrogen and phosphorus nutrients and microbial community in experimental water[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2019, 15(1): 31-41. DOI: 10.12131/20180144
    [9]LI Xuguang, QI Zhanhui, LIN Lin, ZHANG Zhe, HUANG Honghui. Preliminary study on archaeal community in sediment of Dapeng Cove using high-throughput sequencing[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2015, 11(6): 1-8. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-0780.2015.06.001
    [10]YANG Bing, LIN Lin, LI Chunhou, XU Shannan, LIU Yong, XIAO Yayuan, CHEN Zuozhi. Development and evaluation of microsatellite markers in Parargyrops edita[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2015, 11(4): 116-120. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-0780.2015.04.017

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(9)

    1. 史银魁，俞立雄，周雪，高雷，朱峰跃，杨锦毅，陈大庆，王珂，段辛斌. 禁渔初期长江宜昌-城陵矶江段鱼类资源时空分布特征. 水生生物学报. 2024(04): 546-558 .
    2. 张丽媛，熊清海，田敏，刘淑伟，王慧，曲品，蒋荣明，杨剑虹. 阳宗海鱼类群落结构及变化. 云南农业大学学报(自然科学). 2024(02): 60-69 .
    3. 史艳萍，屈婵娟，许旺，周春花，梁璐，王宇翔，任文伟，戴年华，徐晓娟，黎栩霞，计勇，吴小平，金斌松. 基于环境DNA宏条形码的青岚湖自然保护区鱼类组成及分布特征. 中国环境监测. 2024(03): 235-246 .
    4. 曹寿清，杨思雅，胡江春，杨慕静. 泸沽湖小口裂腹鱼人工驯养繁育试验. 水产养殖. 2024(07): 44-47 .
    5. 张航，梁智策，匡晨亿，周婷，廖传松，苑晶，郭传波，刘家寿. 基于水声学和渔获物调查的洱海鱼类资源时空分布特征. 水生生物学报. 2024(12): 2029-2041 .
    6. 贾春艳，王珂，李慧峰，高雷，杨浩，刘绍平，陈大庆，段辛斌. 禁渔初期东洞庭湖鱼类资源的空间分布与密度变化. 南方水产科学. 2022(03): 48-56 . 本站查看
    7. 王书献，张胜茂，戴阳，王永进，隋江华，朱文斌. 利用声呐数据提取磷虾捕捞深度方法研究. 南方水产科学. 2021(04): 91-97 . 本站查看
    8. 梁祥，薛绍伟，武智，王静，张建斌，赖宝衡，胡智光. 云龙水库鱼类资源声学评估. 西南农业学报. 2021(09): 2057-2062 .
    9. 徐川，胡正春. 核电厂冷源安全渔业资源声学调查. 电力安全技术. 2020(10): 55-59 .

    Other cited types(2)

Catalog

    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML
    Article views (249) PDF downloads (26) Cited by(11)
    Related

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co., Ltd.  

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return