Volume 19 Issue 3
Jun.  2023
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Abstract
References
Related Articles
ZHANG Xinxin, LI Ting, LI Shaowen, ZHU Changbo, ZHANG Bo, SU Jiaqi, RUAN Guoliang, ZHANG Xiaoyang. Purification effect of searice paddy field on brackish water environment of shrimp culture[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2023, 19(3): 19-28. DOI: 10.12131/20220261
Citation: ZHANG Xinxin, LI Ting, LI Shaowen, ZHU Changbo, ZHANG Bo, SU Jiaqi, RUAN Guoliang, ZHANG Xiaoyang. Purification effect of searice paddy field on brackish water environment of shrimp culture[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2023, 19(3): 19-28. DOI: 10.12131/20220261
shu

Purification effect of searice paddy field on brackish water environment of shrimp culture

  • 1.

    Animal Science College, Yangtze University/Engineering Research Center of Ecology and Agricultural Use of Wetland, Ministry of Education, Jingzhou 434025, China

  • 2.

    South China Sea Fisheries Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences/Key Laboratory of South China Sea Fishery Resources Development and Utilization, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Guangzhou 510300, China

  • 3.

    Shandong Marine Resource and Environment Research Institute/Shandong Key laboratory of Marine Ecological Restoration, Yantai 264006, China

  • 4.

    Zhuhai Yueshun Aquaculture Co. Ltd., Zhuhai 519170, China

More Information
  • Received Date: September 29, 2022
  • Revised Date: December 19, 2022
  • Accepted Date: January 04, 2023
  • Available Online: January 08, 2023
    Graphical Abstract
    • Abstract
  • In order to explore the water purification effect of paddy field in the combined pond-paddy field farming system, we analyzed the biofiltration ability of sea rice paddy field in two shrimp culture seasons (Summer and winter). In the summer trial, the tail water of shrimp culture was purified by sea rice and common rice paddy fields with different planting densities, and the purification efficiency of sea rice paddy fields with standard planting density was the highest. After six weeks, the removal rates of ammonia nitrogen, nitrate nitrogen, nitrite nitrogen, total phosphorus and chemical oxygen demand in standard sea rice treatment were 81.6%, 68.2%, 63.7%, 91.0% and 29.7%, respectively, which were significantly higher than those in the control treatment (P<0.05), and the removal rates of ammonia nitrogen and total inorganic nitrogen were significantly higher than those in the common rice treatment (P<0.05). In the winter trial, sea rice was harvested in the shrimp-rice pond, the average concentrations of ammonia nitrogen, nitrite nitrogen, total inorganic nitrogen and total particulate matter in the shrimp-rice ponds decreased by 51.5%, 40%, 36.7% and 11.2%, respectively, compared with the shrimp monoculture ponds (P<0.05). The average concentrations of nitrate nitrogen, total phosphorus and chemical oxygen demand, particulate organic matter and particulate inorganic matter were not significantly different from those in monoculture ponds (P>0.05). The results show that the sea rice paddy field has certain purification ability in both rice growing season and non-growing season, which helps to maintain a good water environment for shrimp growth.
    • FullText(HTML)
    • References (37)
  • [1]
    康保超, 雷莹, 张亚楠, 等. 南美白对虾两种养殖模式下的经济效益比较分析[J]. 中国渔业经济, 2014, 32(6): 64-69. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-590X.2014.06.009
    [2]
    孙万胜, 付志茹, 张玲, 等. 海水池塘养殖南美白对虾产排污状况调查[J]. 中国水产, 2022, 65(8): 24-26.
    [3]
    孙成波, 李义军, 李婷, 等. 凡纳滨对虾精养池养殖水体的富营养状况时空差异[J]. 热带生物学报, 2013, 4(2): 105-110. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-7054.2013.02.001
    [4]
    HERBECK L S, UNGER D, WU Y, et al. Effluent, nutrient and organic matter export from shrimp and fish ponds causing eutrophi-cation in coastal and back-reef waters of NE Hainan, tropical China[J]. Cont Shelf Res, 2013, 57: 92-104. doi: 10.1016/j.csr.2012.05.006
    [5]
    宁立, 王宾, 刘威, 等. 生物浮床调控水质技术试验与分析[J]. 中国水产, 2013, 56(6): 56-58.
    [6]
    裴鹏兵, 杜虹, 黄晓颖, 等. PET净水栅对虾池养殖生态环境的影响研究[J]. 南方水产科学, 2017, 13(4): 42-51. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-0780.2017.04.006
    [7]
    张凯, 李志斐, 谢骏, 等. 生态基对大口黑鲈池塘养殖系统水质及能量收支的影响研究[J]. 南方水产科学, 2018, 14(5): 53-59. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-0780.2018.05.007
    [8]
    钟晓辉, 张平, 汪小平. 人工湿地污水处理技术及其在我国发展的现状与前景[J]. 华东科技(综合), 2021, 39(8): 267-288.
    [9]
    李松, 梁新强, 王飞儿, 等. 稻田湿地处理农村生活污水除磷试验研究[J]. 环境科学与技术, 2010, 33(12): 75-79.
    [10]
    冯金飞, 李凤博, 吴殿星, 等. 稻作系统对淡水养殖池塘富营养化的修复效应及应用前景[J]. 生态学报, 2014, 34(16): 4480-4487.
    [11]
    薛利红, 杨林章. 太湖流域稻田湿地对低污染水中氮磷的净化效果[J]. 环境科学研究, 2015, 28(1): 117-124.
    [12]
    竺平, 张开惠, 宋德玉, 等. 荆州市稻虾共作生产现状、存在问题与建议[J]. 基层农技推广, 2019, 7(3): 101-103.
    [13]
    李凤博, 冯金飞, 周锡跃, 等. 鱼塘种稻对养殖水体营养物质的去除作用研究[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2015, 29(2): 174-180. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7216.2015.02.009
    [14]
    王建飞, 陈宏友, 杨庆利, 等. 盐胁迫浓度和胁迫时的温度对水稻耐盐性的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2004, 18(5): 449-454. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-7216.2004.05.013
    [15]
    朱孔志, 卢俊, 陈锦珠, 等. 适合江苏盐渍化中低产田种植的水稻品种(系)筛选[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2019, 47(24): 40-43.
    [16]
    陈俏媛, 李斯琪, 梁慧琳, 等. 海水稻的栽培与价值[J]. 农技服务, 2016, 33(6): 19.
    [17]
    李佳伟, 郭桂纯. 把海洋变粮仓的“海水稻”[J]. 环境, 2015, 38(1): 67-68. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0257-0300.2015.01.023
    [18]
    陈雨生, 王平, 王克响, 等. 我国海水稻产业发展的战略选择[J]. 中国海洋大学学报, 2018, 31(1): 50-54.
    [19]
    KARABA A, DIXIT S, GRECO R, et al. Improvement of water use efficiency in rice by expression of HARDY, an Arabidopsis drought and salt tolerance gene[J]. P Natl Acad Sci USA, 2007, 104(39): 15270-15275. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0707294104
    [20]
    ISLAM M R, SARKER M R A, SHARMA N, et al. Assessment of adaptability of recently released salt tolerant rice varieties in coastal regions of South Bangladesh[J]. Field Crop Res, 2016, 190: 34-43. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2015.09.012
    [21]
    SINGH A K, ANSARI M W, PAREEK A, et al. Raising salinity tolerant rice: recent progress and future perspectives[J]. Physiol Mol Biol Pla, 2008, 14(1/2): 137-154.
    [22]
    曾毅夫, 邱敬贤, 刘君, 等. 人工湿地水处理技术研究进展[J]. 湿地科学与管理, 2018, 14(3): 62-65. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-3290.2018.03.15
    [23]
    SANSANAYUTH P, PHADUNGCHEP A, NGAMMONTHA S, et al. Shrimp pond effluent: pollution problems and treatment by constructed wetland[J]. Water Sci Technol. 1996, 34(11): 93-98.
    [24]
    郭焕晓, 马牧源, 孙红文. 中国北部沿海高盐度地区人工湿地植物研究[J]. 铁道工程学报, 2006, 23(9): 6-9. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-2106.2006.09.002
    [25]
    尚克春, 刘宪斌, 陈晓英. 高盐废水人工湿地处理中耐盐植物的筛选[J]. 农业资源与环境学报, 2014, 31(1): 74-78.
    [26]
    张超超, 李长玲, 曾奇韬, 等. 白骨壤人工湿地对模拟对虾养殖废水处理效果及细菌群落组成的影响[J]. 广东海洋大学学报, 2019, 39(3): 70-78. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-9159.2019.03.010
    [27]
    张弘杰, 过梓栩, 赵大勇, 等. 基于稻田湿地的循环水养殖系统水质变化[J]. 环境科学与技术, 2020, 43(S1): 159-164.
    [28]
    袁星, 林彦彦, 黄建荣, 等. 海马齿生态浮床对海水养殖池塘的修复效果[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2016, 44(14): 69-75. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0517-6611.2016.14.025
    [29]
    陈家长, 孟顺龙, 胡庚东, 等. 空心菜浮床栽培对集约化养殖鱼塘水质的影响[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2010, 26(2): 155-159. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-4831.2010.02.011
    [30]
    赵琦. 水稻氮肥利用效率的研究进展[J]. 中国稻米, 2016, 22(6): 15-19. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-8082.2016.06.004
    [31]
    杨秀霞, 燕辉, 商庆银, 等. 氮素形态及水分胁迫对水稻根系水分吸收的影响机制[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2018, 57(21): 51-59.
    [32]
    寇红岩, 冼健安, 郭慧, 等. 亚硝酸盐对虾类毒性影响的研究进展[J]. 海洋科学, 2014, 38(2): 107-115.
    [33]
    傅纯洁, 尼倩, 葛溧, 等. 氨氮对对虾毒性的风险评估[J]. 水产养殖, 2019, 40(2): 40-43. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-2091.2019.02.015
    [34]
    沈桂宇. 主要污染因子对虾蟹健康影响的研究进展[J]. 饲料工业, 2013, 34(22): 47-51.
    [35]
    LI T, ZHANG B, ZHU C B, et al. Effects of an ex situ shrimp-rice aquaponic system on the water quality of aquaculture ponds in the Pearl River estuary, China[J]. Aquaculture, 2021, 545: 737179. doi: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2021.737179
    [36]
    陈壁波, 黄璇卿, 曾运萍. 虾类养殖水体水质及底泥条件对养殖生态系统的影响[J]. 黑龙江生态工程职业学院学报, 2018, 31(5): 15-18. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-6341.2018.05.008
    [37]
    包特力根白乙. 中国鱼-稻模式生态渔业: 发展历程·生产效益·服务功能[J]. 生态经济, 2012, 28(2): 120-126. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-4407.2012.02.028
    • Related Articles

  • Related Articles

    [1]WANG Xiaoyan, ZHOU Shengjie, WANG Yinggang, SUN Yongyue, LI Minghao, MA Zhenhua. Effects of acidification stress on antioxidant and immunity in juvenile yellowfin tuna (Thunnus albacares)[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2024, 20(3): 85-91. DOI: 10.12131/20230216
    [2]JIANG Kui, HU Xiaojuan, XU Chuangwen, HONG Minna, LIU Xiyao, MAI Xiaoyong, CHEN Haiyi, YANG Keng. Effects of schizophyllan on growth, immunity and intestinal microflora of Litopenaeus vannamei[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2023, 19(5): 95-103. DOI: 10.12131/20230041
    [3]BAO Yuhang, ZHANG Xinyu, YIN Shangjun, ZHANG Haiqi, XU Jiehao. Effects of Chinese herbal compound on intestinal microbiota and non-specific immune function of Pelodiscus sinensis[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2023, 19(5): 86-94. DOI: 10.12131/20230069
    [4]XIAO Bo, ZHOU Shengjie, WANG Yinggang, FU Zhengyi, FANG Wei, YU Gang, MA Zhenhua. Effects of fermented Astragalus membranaceus on growth, digestion, immune function and ammonia nitrogen resistance of Epinephelus fuscoguttatus[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2023, 19(2): 161-169. DOI: 10.12131/20220197
    [5]XIAO Wenfu, HU Bing, CUI Xuehai, CAO Manxia, YAO Haihang, LI Peng, YU Lijuan, YUAN Hanwen, GAO Weihua, TIAN Juan. Effects of egg product on growth performance, muscle nutrients, and intestinal microflora of Procambarus clarkii[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2023, 19(1): 116-127. DOI: 10.12131/20220128
    [6]HUANG Jianbin, CHI Yan, ZHOU Chuanpeng, HUANG Xiaolin, HUANG Zhong, YU Wei, XUN Pengwei, WU Yang, ZHANG Yu, LIN Heizhao. Effects of dietary alginate oligosaccharide on growth performance, antioxidative capacity and immune function of juvenile Trachinotus ovatus[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2022, 18(3): 118-128. DOI: 10.12131/20210161
    [7]YU Wei, YANG Yukai, LIN Heizhao, HUANG Xiaolin, HUANG Zhong, LI Tao, ZHOU Chuanpeng, MA Zhenhua, XUN Pengwei, YANG Changping. Effects of taurine on growth performance, digestive enzymes, antioxidant capacity and immune indices of Lateolabrax maculatus[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2021, 17(2): 78-86. DOI: 10.12131/20200223
    [8]CHEN Jie, HE Yang, DAI Xuping, WANG Jun, QING Chuanjie, LI Rui. Histological observation and innate immune barrier study of head kidney of Pelteobagrus vachelli[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2021, 17(1): 82-90. DOI: 10.12131/20200119
    [9]LIU Qian, JIANG Shigui, QIU Lihua, HUANG Jianhua, ZHOU Falin, YANG Qibin, JIANG Song, YANG Lishi. Immune function and expression of Toll9 receptor gene from Penaeus monodon[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2017, 13(5): 63-71. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-0780.2017.05.009
    [10]XIAO Wei, LI Dayu, XU Yang, ZOU Zhiying, ZHU Jinglin, HAN Jue, YANG Hong. Effects of chronic external ammonia stress on growth, immunity and metabolism of juvenile GIFT tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus)[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2015, 11(4): 81-87. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-0780.2015.04.012

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(5)

    1. 李瑶瑶，金圣涵，翟瑞意，李英美，李婷婷，韩玲钰. 不同海参糖肽的制备及其对鲅鱼鱼糜凝胶品质的影响. 食品科技. 2024(05): 115-124 .
    2. 魏登枭，车丹丹，陈必链，何勇锦，周志华. 三相分离法提取裂殖壶藻中油脂、蛋白质和多糖的工艺优化. 中国油脂. 2023(03): 123-129 .
    3. 牛秋云. 小麦胚芽蛋白糖基化产物抗氧化特性研究. 食品与机械. 2023(05): 32-37 .
    4. 郭浩彬，李敏杰，张陆燕，章银良. 美拉德反应优化藜麦多肽抗氧化活性的研究. 中国调味品. 2023(12): 59-68 .
    5. 董烨，张益奇，张晓頔，胡学佳，戴志远. 鳙鱼皮水解物美拉德反应产物抗氧化活性研究. 核农学报. 2022(11): 2199-2209 .

    Other cited types(2)

Catalog

    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML
    Article views (452) PDF downloads (52) Cited by(7)
    Related

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co., Ltd.  

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return