FENG Ji, ZHU Jiangfeng, ZHANG Fan, LI Yanan, GENG Zhe. Influence of statistical deviation of historical catch on stock assessment: a case study of western Atlantic Thunnus thynnus[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2023, 19(1): 1-11. DOI: 10.12131/20220037
Citation: FENG Ji, ZHU Jiangfeng, ZHANG Fan, LI Yanan, GENG Zhe. Influence of statistical deviation of historical catch on stock assessment: a case study of western Atlantic Thunnus thynnus[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2023, 19(1): 1-11. DOI: 10.12131/20220037

Influence of statistical deviation of historical catch on stock assessment: a case study of western Atlantic Thunnus thynnus

More Information
  • Received Date: February 20, 2022
  • Revised Date: April 17, 2022
  • Accepted Date: April 17, 2022
  • Available Online: October 19, 2022
  • Catch data, which is the most basic data for stock assessment, is also most likely to cause reporting and statistical errors. Misreporting is one of the causes for statistical deviation of historical catch, which is currently prevalent in all types of fisheries worldwide. Analyzing the influence of statistical deviation of historical catch on stock assessment based on historical data helps to establish reasonable management objectives, and promote sustainable utilization of fishery resources. In this study, we selected western Atlantic bluefin tuna (Thunnus thynnus) as an example to evaluate the influence of statistical deviation of historical catch on its stock assessment. We carried out a stock assessment by using Age-Structured Assessment Program (Age-Structured Assessment Program, ASAP), and investigated the effects of catch information inaccuracy on the assessment results by setting different levels of statistical deviation of historical catch. The results indicate that the estimated values of fishing mortality (F) and spawning stock biomass (SSB) changed in the same direction with the adjusted catch. With the increase of statistical deviation of catch, the relative difference of biological reference points also increased. The relative deviation rate of F-related biological reference points was less than 1% under all eight assumed statistical deviations of catch. When the statistical deviation of the historical catch was assumed as −20%, the maximum relative difference of SSB-related biological reference points was about 4%. The statistical deviation of catch had a more obvious impact on SSB-related biological reference points than F-related biological reference points. In conclusion, it is suggested to strengthen the source analysis of catch data quality issues, so that the scientific reconstruction of historical fishery data can be conducted to improve the accuracy and reliability of the stock assessment results.
  • [1]
    ROUSSEAU D M. Is there such a thing as "evidence-based management"?[J]. Acad Manage Rev, 2006, 31(2): 256-269. doi: 10.5465/amr.2006.20208679
    [2]
    RUDD M B, BRANCH T A. Does unreported catch lead to overfishing?[J]. Fish Fish, 2017, 18(2): 313-323. doi: 10.1111/faf.12181
    [3]
    CHEN Y, CHEN L, STERGIOU K I. Impacts of data quantity on fisheries stock assessment[J]. Aquat Sci, 2003, 65(1): 92-98. doi: 10.1007/s000270300008
    [4]
    CHEN Y, RAJAKARUNA H. Quality and quantity of fisheries information in stock assessment[C]//American Fisheries Society Symposium. Bethesda: American Fisheries Society, 2003: 411-424.
    [5]
    DERRICK B, KHALFALLAH M, RELANO V, et al. Updating to 2018 the 1950−2010 Marine Catch Reconstructions of the Sea Around US: Part I-Africa, Antarctica, Europe and the North Atlantic[R] Vancouver: Fisheries Centre Research Reports, 2020, 28(5): 7-8.
    [6]
    BELHABIB D, KOUTOB V, SALL A, et al. Fisheries catch misreporting and its implications: the case of Senegal[J]. Fish Res, 2014, 151: 1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.fishres.2013.12.006
    [7]
    PAULY D, ZELLER D. Catch reconstructions reveal that global marine fisheries catches are higher than reported and declining[J]. Nat Commun, 2016, 7(1): 1-9.
    [8]
    FOSSILE T, FERREIRA J, da ROCHA BANDEIRA D, et al. Pre-Columbian fisheries catch reconstruction for a subtropical estuary in South America[J]. Fish Fish, 2019, 20(6): 1124-1137. doi: 10.1111/faf.12401
    [9]
    TESFAMICHAEL D, PAULY D. Catch reconstruction for the Red Sea large marine ecosystem by countries (1950-2010)[R]. Vancouver: Fisheries Centre Research Report, 2012, 20(1): 244.
    [10]
    MOAZZAM M, AYUB S. Catch reconstruction of neritic tuna landings of Pakistan based on data collected by WWF-Pakistan's crew based Observer Programme[R]. Victoria Mahé: Seventh Session of IOTC Working Party on Neritic Tuna (WPNT07), 2017: 10-13.
    [11]
    van BEVEREN E, DUPLISEA D E, MARENTETTE J R, et al. An example of how catch uncertainty hinders effective stock management and rebuilding[J]. Fish Res, 2020, 224: 105473. doi: 10.1016/j.fishres.2019.105473
    [12]
    吕翔, 黄硕琳. 大西洋蓝鳍金枪鱼资源开发与养护问题分析[J]. 上海海洋大学学报, 2016, 25(6): 936-944. doi: 10.12024/jsou.20160301717
    [13]
    FROMENTIN J M, POWERS J E. Atlantic bluefin tuna: population dynamics, ecology, fisheries and management[J]. Fish Fish, 2005, 6(4): 281-306. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-2979.2005.00197.x
    [14]
    李亚楠, 戴小杰, 朱江峰, 等. 渔获量不确定性对印度洋大眼金枪鱼资源评估的影响[J]. 渔业科学进展, 2018, 39(5): 1-9. doi: 10.19663/j.issn2095-9869.20170627001
    [15]
    ANONYMOUS. Report of the 2017 ICCAT bluefin tuna data preparatory meeting[R]. Madrid: ICCAT Col Vol Sci Pap, 2018, 74(6): 2268-2731.
    [16]
    ANONYMOUS. Report of the 2017 ICCAT bluefin stock assessment meeting[R]. Madrid: ICCAT Col Vol Sci Pap, 2018, 74(6): 2372-2535.
    [17]
    LAURETTA M, KIMOTO A, PORCH C E, et al. A preliminary assessment of the status of the western Atlantic bluefin tuna stock (1970−2013)[R]. ICCAT Col Vol Sci Pap, 2015, 71(4): 1545-1603.
    [18]
    RODRIGUEZ-MARIN E, ORTIZ M, ORTIZ de URBINA J M, et al. Atlantic bluefin tuna (Thunnus thynnus) biometrics and condition[J]. PLoS One, 2015, 10(10): e0141478. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0141478
    [19]
    WALTER J, SHARMA R, ORTIZ M. Western Atlantic bluefin tuna stock assessment 1950−2015 using Stock Synthesis[R]. Madrid: ICCAT Col Vol Sci Pap, 2018, 74(6): 3305-3404.
    [20]
    BOENISH R, CHEN Y. Re-evaluating Atlantic cod mortality including lobster bycatch: where could we be today?[J]. Can J Fish Aquat Sci, 2020, 77(6): 1049-1058. doi: 10.1139/cjfas-2019-0313
    [21]
    朱江峰, 戴小杰, 官文江. 印度洋长鳍金枪鱼资源评估[J]. 渔业科学进展, 2014, 35(1): 1-8. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7075.2014.01.001
    [22]
    KURIYAMA P T, ZWOLINSKI J P, HILL K T, et al. Assessment of the Pacific sardine resource in 2020 for US management in 2020−2021[R]. La Jolla: Department of Commerce, NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-SWFSC-628, 2020: 191.
    [23]
    官文江, 田思泉, 朱江峰, 等. 渔业资源评估模型的研究现状与展望[J]. 中国水产科学, 2013, 20(5): 1112-1120.
    [24]
    NOAA Fisheries Toolbox. Technical documentation for ASAP version 3.0[Z]. Washington: NOAA, 2013: 2-10.
    [25]
    LEGAULT C M, RESTREPO V R. A flexible forward age-structured assessment program[R]. Madrid: ICCAT Col Vol Sci Pap, 1998, 49: 246-253.
    [26]
    ICCAT. Report of the 2004 ICCAT data exploratory meeting for east Atlantic and Mediterranean bluefin tuna[R]. Madrid: ICCAT Col Vol Sci Pap, 2005, 58(2): 662-699.
    [27]
    SAGARESE S R, HARFORD W J, WALTER J F, et al. Lessons learned from data-limited evaluations of data-rich reef fish species in the Gulf of Mexico: implications for providing fisheries management advice for data-poor stocks[J]. Can J Fish Aquat Sci, 2019, 76(9): 1624-1639. doi: 10.1139/cjfas-2017-0482
    [28]
    ARNOLD L M, HEPPELL S S. Testing the robustness of data-poor assessment methods to uncertainty in catch and biology: a retrospective approach[J]. ICES J Mar Sci, 2015, 72(1): 243-250. doi: 10.1093/icesjms/fsu077
    [29]
    WISE J P. Probable under estimates and misreporting of Atlantic small tuna catches, with suggestions for improvement[R]. Madrid: ICCAT Sci Pap, 1986, 25: 324-332.
    [30]
    PASCOE S. Bycatch management and the economics of discarding[M]. Rome: FAO, 1997: 13.
    [31]
    POLACHECK T. Assessment of IUU fishing for southern bluefin tuna[J]. Mar Policy, 2012, 36(5): 1150-1165. doi: 10.1016/j.marpol.2012.02.019
    [32]
    童玉和, 陈新军, 田思泉, 等. 渔业管理中生物学参考点的理论及其应用[J]. 水产学报, 2010, 34(7): 1040-1050.
    [33]
    张魁, 刘群, 廖宝超, 等. 渔业数据失真对两种非平衡剩余产量模型评估结果的影响比较[J]. 水产学报, 2018, 42(9): 1378-1389.
    [34]
    PRAGER M H. A suite of extensions to a nonequilibrium surplus-production model[J]. Fish Bull, 1994, 92: 374-389.
    [35]
    KELL L T, FROMENTIN J M. Evaluation of the robustness of maximum sustainable yield based management strategies to variations in carrying capacity or migration pattern of Atlantic bluefin tuna (Thunnus thynnus)[J]. Can J Fish Aquat Sci, 2007, 64(5): 837-847. doi: 10.1139/f07-051
    [36]
    ICCAT. Report of the 2002 Atlantic bluefin tuna stock assessment session[R]. Madrid: ICCAT Col Vol Sci Pap, 2003, 55: 710-937.
    [37]
    ICCAT. Recommendation by ICCAT on penalties applicable in case of non-fulfilment of reporting obligations[R]. Madrid: ICCAT, 2011, 11(15): 263.
    [38]
    ICCAT. Recommendation by ICCAT for an interim conservation and management plan for western Atlantic bluefin tuna[R]. Madrid: ICCAT, 2017, 17(6): 104-109.
  • Related Articles

    [1]QIAO Di, LEI Ning, ZHU Junjie, ZHANG Chaonan, WANG Yanchao, ZHOU Ling. Transcriptome analysis of liver anti-MSRV responses in juvenile largemouth bass (Micropterus salmoides)[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2024, 20(4): 164-176. DOI: 10.12131/20240050
    [2]BAO Junjie, WANG Yongjie, CHEN Honglian, SUN Wen, ZHANG Jing, ZHOU Beibei. Untargeted metabolomics analysis of metabolic differences of crayfish (Procambarus clarkii)  meat with different diets[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2023, 19(5): 104-112. DOI: 10.12131/20230055
    [3]ZHANG Linbao, TIAN Fei, CHEN Haigang, ZHANG Zhe, YE Guoling, LI Yitong, TANG Haiwei. Comparative transcriptome analysis in livers of female and male marine medaka (Oryzias melastigma)[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2023, 19(3): 88-97. DOI: 10.12131/20220250
    [4]LIN Feng, JIA Ruonan, WANG Faxiang, XU Qianghua. Differential analysis of microRNAs in zebrafish gills under hypoxic stress[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2022, 18(3): 86-93. DOI: 10.12131/20210124
    [5]LIU Guangxin, DONG Yanjun, ZHAO Lijuan, DENG Yiqin, CHENG Changhong, MA Hongling, JIANG Jianjun, FENG Juan, GUO Zhixun, LIN Li. Sequencing of whole genome of Bacillus velezensis LG37 and screening of inorganic nitrogen metabolism candidate genes[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2022, 18(3): 57-67. DOI: 10.12131/20210149
    [6]GAO Jin, WANG Yongbo, LIU Jinye, GUO Yilan, FU Shuyuan. Transcriptome analysis of Plectropomus leopardus liver under different flow velocity[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2022, 18(1): 107-117. DOI: 10.12131/20210125
    [7]SHEN Ye, WANG Xingqiang, CAO Mei, ZHENG Nianhao, CHEN Baiyao, QIN Chuanxin. Transcriptome analysis of Exopalaemon carinicauda under low salinity stress[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2020, 16(5): 19-32. DOI: 10.12131/20190267
    [8]PENG Min, HAN Yaoquan, WANG Dapeng, SHI Jun, WU Weijun, LI Yusen, LEI Jianjun, HE Anyou. Genetic diversity analysis of Ptychidio jordani in Xijiang River flowing through Guangxi Province based on mitochondrial Cytb gene sequence[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2020, 16(5): 10-18. DOI: 10.12131/20200041
    [9]HUO Huanhuan, LIU Yu, ZHOU Qiubai, GUO Feng, WEI Lili, PENG Mo, ZHANG Yanping, CHEN Wenjing. Primary study on differentially expressed genes screening of Monopterus albus and their regulation mechanism[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2020, 16(1): 1-8. DOI: 10.12131/20190176
    [10]HUANG Yong, GONG Wangbao, CHEN Haigang, XIONG Jianli, SUN Xihong. Sequencing and bioinformatic analysis for transcriptome of Micropterus salmoides based on RNA-seq[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2019, 15(1): 106-112. DOI: 10.12131/20180066
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(0)

    Other cited types(1)

Catalog

    Article views (341) PDF downloads (67) Cited by(1)
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return