Volume 18 Issue 3
Jun.  2022
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Abstract
References
Supplements
JIANG Peiwen, LI Min, ZHANG Shuai, CHEN Zuozhi, XU Shannan. Construction of DNA meta-barcode database of fish in Pearl River Estuary based on mitochondrial cytochrome COI and 12S rDNA gene[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2022, 18(3): 13-21. DOI: 10.12131/20210210
Citation: JIANG Peiwen, LI Min, ZHANG Shuai, CHEN Zuozhi, XU Shannan. Construction of DNA meta-barcode database of fish in Pearl River Estuary based on mitochondrial cytochrome COI and 12S rDNA gene[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2022, 18(3): 13-21. DOI: 10.12131/20210210
shu

Construction of DNA meta-barcode database of fish in Pearl River Estuary based on mitochondrial cytochrome COI and 12S rDNA gene

  • 1.

    College of Fisheries and Life Science, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai 201306, China

  • 2.

    South China Sea Fisheries Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences/Key Laboratory for Sustainable Utilization of Open-Sea Fishery, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs/Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Fishery Ecology and Environment, Guangzhou 510300, China

  • 3.

    Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Guangzhou), Guangzhou 511458, China

More Information
  • Received Date: July 27, 2021
  • Revised Date: August 15, 2021
  • Accepted Date: September 02, 2021
  • Available Online: October 16, 2021
    Graphical Abstract
    • Abstract
  • In order to establish a DNA barcode background database of fish in the Pearl River Estuary and provide information basis for fish species identification and diversity research, we had collected 251 samples from the Pearl River Estuary from 2020 to 2021, and determined 652 bp fragments of mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase subunit I (COI) of 219 individuals and 163−185 bp fragments of mitochondrial 12s rDNA of 247 individuals of 99 species, 10 families, 41 genera, 6 orders. Besides, we downloaded 165 COI sequences and 128 12S rDNA sequences from GenBank database, and had obtained 384 COI sequences and 375 12S rDNA sequences of 172 species of fish. The results show that the average intraspecific genetic distance of COI sequence was 0.20%, and the average interspecific genetic distance was 25.54%. The average intraspecific genetic distance of 12S rDNA sequence was 0.12%, and the average interspecific genetic distance was 34.39%. The DNA barcode of COI gene could form an obvious barcode gap, but the DNA barcode based on 12s rDNA gene could not, and it was difficult to distinguish the 11 species (6.4% of the total species). The establishment of the DNA barcode database of fish in the Pearl River Estuary is conductive to the environmental DNA analysis of the fish ecosystem in that area, providing reliable technical support for the protection of fish biodiversity and the monitoring of population dynamics in the Pearl River Estuary.
    • FullText(HTML)
    • References (35)
  • [1]
    林坤, 麦广铭, 王力飞, 等. 2015—2018年珠江口近岸海域鱼类群落结构及其稳定性[J]. 水产学报, 2020, 44(11): 1841-1850.
    [2]
    袁梦, 汤勇, 徐姗楠, 等. 珠江河口南沙海域秋季渔业资源群落结构特征[J]. 南方水产科学, 2017, 13(2): 18-25. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-0780.2017.02.003
    [3]
    赵蒙蒙, 寇杰锋, 杨静, 等. 粤港澳大湾区海岸带生态安全问题与保护建议[J]. 环境保护, 2019, 47(23): 29-34.
    [4]
    汪曦. 河南省鱼类DNA条形码数据库构建及隐存种挖掘[D]. 新乡: 河南师范大学, 2019: 2-10.
    [5]
    HEBERT P D, CYWINSKA A, BALL S L, et al. Biological identifications through DNA barcodes[J]. Proc R Soc B, 2003, 270(1512): 313-321. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2002.2218
    [6]
    WARD R D, ZEMLAK T S, INNES B H, et al. DNA barcoding Australia's fish species[J]. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B, 2005, 360(1462): 1847-1857. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2005.1716
    [7]
    WANG S, YAN Z, HÄNFLING B, et al. Methodology of fish eDNA and its applications in ecology and environment[J]. Sci Total Environ, 2021, 755(2): 142622.
    [8]
    ZOU K S, CHEN J W, RUAN H T, et al. eDNA metabarcoding as a promising conservation tool for monitoring fish diversity in a coastal wetland of the Pearl River Estuary compared to bottom trawling[J]. Sci Total Environ, 2020, 702: 134704. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134704
    [9]
    TURON M, ANGULO-PRECKLER C, ANTICH A, et al. More than expected from old sponge samples: a natural sampler DNA metabarcoding assessment of marine fish diversity in Nha Trang Bay (Vietnam)[J]. Front Mar Sci, 2020, 7(12): 1-14.
    [10]
    陈炼, 吴琳, 刘燕, 等. 环境DNA metabarcoding及其在生态学研究中的应用[J]. 生态学报, 2016, 36(15): 4573-4582.
    [11]
    MIYA M, SATO Y, FUKUNAGA T, et al. MiFish, a set of universal PCR primers for metabarcoding environmental DNA from fishes: detection of more than 230 subtropical marine species[J]. R Soc Open Sci, 2015, 2(7): 150088. doi: 10.1098/rsos.150088
    [12]
    GOLD Z, SPRAGUE J, KUSHNER D J, et al. eDNA metabarcoding as a biomonitoring tool for marine protected areas[J]. Published Online, 2021, 16(2): 1-19.
    [13]
    HIDEYUKI D, RYUTEI I, SHUNSUKE M, et al. Estimation of biodiversity metrics by environmental DNA metabarcoding compared with visual and capture surveys of river fish communities[J]. Freshw Biol, 2021, 66: 1257-1266. doi: 10.1111/fwb.13714
    [14]
    DÍAZ J, VANINA V, FELIPE D P, et al. First DNA barcode reference library for the identification of South American freshwater fish from the lower Paraná River[J]. PLOS ONE, 2016, 11(7): 1-21.
    [15]
    WANG Y H, DUAN J N, SHI H L, et al. Species identification of small fish in Xixuan Island coastal waters of Zhoushan using DNA barcoding[J]. J Appl Ichthyol, 2020, 36(1): 75-84. doi: 10.1111/jai.13995
    [16]
    成庆泰, 郑葆珊. 中国鱼类系统检索[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1990: 55-536.
    [17]
    肖瑜璋, 王蓉, 郑琰晶, 等. 珠江口鱼类浮游生物种类组成与数量分布[J]. 热带海洋学报, 2013, 32(6): 80-87. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-5470.2013.06.012
    [18]
    李永振, 陈国宝, 孙典荣. 珠江口鱼类组成分析[J]. 水产学报, 2000, 24(4): 312-317.
    [19]
    詹海刚. 珠江口及邻近水域鱼类群落结构研究[J]. 海洋学报(中文版), 1998(3): 91-97.
    [20]
    王迪, 林昭进. 珠江口鱼类群落结构的时空变化[J]. 南方水产, 2006, 2(4): 37-45.
    [21]
    黄吉万, 孙典荣, 刘岩, 等. 珠江口中华白海豚自然保护区鱼类群落多样性分析[J]. 南方农业学报, 2018, 49(5): 1000-1007. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-1191.2018.05.25
    [22]
    SWINDELL S R, PLASTERER T N. SEQMAN Contig assembly[J]. Methods Mol Biol, 1997, 70: 75-89.
    [23]
    KUMAR S, STECHER G, LI M, et al. MEGA X: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms[J]. Mol Biol Evol, 2018, 35: 1547-1549. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msy096
    [24]
    ROBINSON E A, GERGIN B, HEBERT P, et al. Prospects for using DNA barcoding to identify spiders in species-rich genera[J]. Zookeys, 2009, 46: 27-46.
    [25]
    PUILLANDRE N, LAMBERT A, BROUILLET S, et al. ABGD, automatic barcode gap discovery for primary species delimitation[J]. Mol Ecol, 2012, 21: 1864-1877. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2011.05239.x
    [26]
    ZHANG D F, GAO I, ZOU J, et al. PhyloSuite: an integrated and scalable desktop platform for streamlined molecular sequence data management and evolutionary phylogenetics studies[J]. Mol Ecol Resour, 2020, 20(1): 348-355. doi: 10.1111/1755-0998.13096
    [27]
    IVICA L, PEER B. Interactive Tree Of Life (iTOL) v4: recent updates and new developments[J]. Nucleic Acids Res, 2019, 47(1): 256-259.
    [28]
    ANDRIYONO S, ALAM M J, KIM H W. The Jawa and Bali Island marine fish molecular identification to improve 12S rRNA-tRNA Valin-16S rRNA partial region sequences on the GenBank database[J]. Thalassas, 2020, 36(2): 343-356. doi: 10.1007/s41208-020-00196-x
    [29]
    李因强. 珠江口水域鱼类群落结构研究[D]. 湛江: 广东海洋大学, 2008: 2-10.
    [30]
    袁健美, 张虎, 胡海生, 等. 南黄海两个水产种质资源保护区底拖网大型底栖动物群落组成及多样性[J]. 生态学杂志, 2021, 40(7): 2186-2193.
    [31]
    罗纯, 章群, 黄志基, 等. 中日沿海部分鱼类DNA条形码研究[J]. 海洋渔业, 2021, 43(1): 1-11. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-2490.2021.01.001
    [32]
    郜星晨, 姜伟. 三峡库区常见鱼类DNA条形码本地BLAST数据库的构建和应用[J]. 基因组学与应用生物学, 2020, 39(11): 1-21.
    [33]
    PUEBLA O. Ecological speciation in marine v. freshwater fishes[J]. J Fish Biol, 2009, 75(5): 960-996. doi: 10.1111/j.1095-8649.2009.02358.x
    [34]
    PAVAN-KUMAR A, GIREESH-BABU P, SURESH BABU P P, et al. Molecular phylogeny of elasmobranchs inferred from mitochondrial and nuclear markers[J]. Mol Biol Rep, 2014, 41: 447-457. doi: 10.1007/s11033-013-2879-6
    [35]
    杨倩倩, 刘苏汶, 俞晓平. DNA条形码分析方法研究进展[J]. 应用生态学报, 2018, 29(3): 1006-1014.
    • Related Articles
  • Supplements (1)

  • Other Related Supplements

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(11)

    1. 王大伟，邢盈，蒋成宇，胡淼，赵金良. 放养密度对鳜幼鱼HPI轴激素、应激酶活力及呼吸频率的影响. 淡水渔业. 2025(02): 26-32 .
    2. 何静怡，魏涯，岑剑伟，郝淑贤，陈胜军，黄卉，赵永强，王悦齐，杨少玲，林织. 基于梯度降温的草鱼暂养及有水保活运输技术. 食品科学. 2024(04): 271-278 .
    3. 何静怡，郑伟，黄卉，岑剑伟，赵永强，王田，魏涯，郝淑贤，杨少玲，陈琛. 不同温度、盐度条件对草鱼暂养及应激保活的影响. 大连海洋大学学报. 2024(04): 597-605 .
    4. 梁雪莹，郑晓婷，陈秋羽，谢静怡，董宏标，李勇，杨金龙，陈成勋，张家松. 模拟运输胁迫对牛蛙幼蛙生理机能的影响. 广东海洋大学学报. 2024(06): 118-126 .
    5. 刘浩，李洁，李亚军，康鹏天，张国维，邵东宏，王建福. 水体中泥沙含量对虹鳟生存、生理和体表微生物的影响. 中国水产科学. 2024(11): 1365-1374 .
    6. 唐忠林，张佳佳，周国勤，陈树桥，徐钢春，徐跑，强俊，王佩佩. 丁香酚对“优鲈3号”幼鱼运输水质及其血液、肌肉生理指标的影响. 水产科技情报. 2023(01): 44-52 .
    7. 王文雯，杨静茹，付正祎，于刚，马振华. 运输时间对高体鰤幼鱼应激、代谢、抗氧化和免疫的影响. 中国渔业质量与标准. 2023(02): 25-36 .
    8. 李哲，周珊珊，王好学，王嘉浩，陈璐，徐开达. 运输振荡对条石鲷幼鱼生理应激和水体总氨氮含量的影响. 水产科技情报. 2023(05): 327-332 .
    9. 范宏博，胡丁月，徐莉，孙浩，刘峰，刘春娥，张小栓. 运输密度和时间对单环刺螠保活运输品质的影响. 农业工程. 2023(10): 72-77 .
    10. 虞为，陈雪晴，杨育凯，张燕娃，黄小林，黄忠，李涛，马振华，吴洽儿，于刚，周传朋，林黑着. 饲料中添加雨生红球藻对尖吻鲈生长性能、抗氧化能力及免疫状态的影响. 南方水产科学. 2022(05): 46-54 . 本站查看
    11. 陈旭，赵旺，陈明强，谭春明，于刚. 盐度胁迫对红娇凤凰螺耗氧率、排氨率以及免疫相关酶活性的影响. 南方水产科学. 2022(05): 160-165 . 本站查看

    Other cited types(4)

Catalog

    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML
    Article views (1967) PDF downloads (252) Cited by(15)
    Related

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co., Ltd.  

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return