Volume 18 Issue 3
Jun.  2022
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Abstract
References
JIA Chunyan, WANG Ke, LI Huifeng, GAO Lei, YANG Hao, LIU Shaoping, CHEN Daqing, DUAN Xinbin. Spatial distribution and density changes of fish resources in East Dongting Lake during early fishing ban period[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2022, 18(3): 48-56. DOI: 10.12131/20210148
Citation: JIA Chunyan, WANG Ke, LI Huifeng, GAO Lei, YANG Hao, LIU Shaoping, CHEN Daqing, DUAN Xinbin. Spatial distribution and density changes of fish resources in East Dongting Lake during early fishing ban period[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2022, 18(3): 48-56. DOI: 10.12131/20210148
shu

Spatial distribution and density changes of fish resources in East Dongting Lake during early fishing ban period

  • 1.

    Yangtze River Fisheries Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences/Fishery Resources and Environmental Science Experimental Station of the Upper-Middle Reaches of Yangtze River, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Wuhan 430223, China

  • 2.

    Shanghai Ocean University/National Demonstration Center for Experimental Fisheries Science Education, Shanghai 201306, China

  • 3.

    Wuxi Fishery College, Nanjing Agricultural University, Wuxi 214081, China

  • 4.

    College of Fisheries Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China

More Information
  • Received Date: May 16, 2021
  • Revised Date: July 29, 2021
  • Accepted Date: September 02, 2021
  • Available Online: October 17, 2021
    Graphical Abstract
    • Abstract
  • In order to find out the density distribution of fish resources in the East Dongting Lake during the early fishing ban period, and provide data support for the effect evaluation of the fishing ban and the protection of fishery resources, we conducted the hydroacoustic surveys in the central area of the East Dongting Lake and the Xiangjiang floodway from November 2 to 8, 2020. The results show that the average target strength of fish in the survey area was −46.48 dB; the average body length was about 18.66 cm, and the body length ranged from 1.63 to 113.50 cm. The difference of fish target intensity between the different regions was significant. The average fish density in all the survey segments was 150.20 ind.· (1 000 m3)−1, ranging from 14.47 to 1 823.95 ind.· (1 000 m3)−1. The average fish density in the East Dongting Lake was greater than that in the Xiangjiang floodway, and there were significant differences in the average density of fish among different regions (P<0.05), highest at the confluence of rivers and lakes. Compared with the survey data of the East Dongting Lake before the fishing ban (2015), the average target intensity of fish after the fishing ban decreased, while the average density of fish increased significantly (P<0.05).
    • FullText(HTML)
    • References (36)
  • [1]
    窦鸿身, 姜家虎. 洞庭湖[M]. 合肥: 中国科学技术大学出版社, 2000: 3-278.
    [2]
    常剑波, 曹文宣. 通江湖泊的渔业意义及其资源管理对策[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 1999, 8: 153-157.
    [3]
    杨健, 肖文, 匡兴安, 等. 洞庭湖、鄱阳湖白暨豚和长江江豚的生态学研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2000, 9(4): 444-450. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-8227.2000.04.008
    [4]
    谢拥军, 张脱冬. 洞庭湖江豚保护现状及对策[J]. 岳阳职业技术学院学报, 2017, 32(5): 22-26, 109. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-738X.2017.05.007
    [5]
    廖伏初, 何望, 黄向荣, 等. 洞庭湖渔业资源现状及其变化[J]. 水生生物学报, 2002, 26(6): 623-627. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-3207.2002.06.008
    [6]
    茹辉军, 刘学勤, 黄向荣, 等. 大型通江湖泊洞庭湖的鱼类物种多样性及其时空变化[J]. 湖泊科学, 2008, 20(1): 93-99. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1003-5427.2008.01.014
    [7]
    李杰钦. 洞庭湖鱼类群落生态研究及保育对策[D]. 长沙: 中南林业科技大学, 2013: 39-40.
    [8]
    谢意军, 王珂, 郭杰, 等. 基于水声学方法的东洞庭湖鱼类空间分布和资源量评估[J]. 淡水渔业, 2016, 46(3): 40-46. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6907.2016.03.007
    [9]
    王崇瑞, 索纹纹, 蒋国民, 等. 东洞庭湖长江江豚及其与鱼类资源相关性[J]. 中国环境科学, 2019, 39(10): 4424-4434. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6923.2019.10.048
    [10]
    王琦, 欧伏平, 张雷, 等. 三峡工程运行后洞庭湖水环境变化及影响分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2015, 24(11): 1843-1849. doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201511006
    [11]
    张文武, 马琴, 黎明政, 等. 三峡水库和长江中下游通江湖泊 (洞庭湖和鄱阳湖) 草鱼、鲢的孵化日期及早期生长特征[J]. 湖泊科学, 2020, 32(3): 804-812. doi: 10.18307/2020.0320
    [12]
    FU C Z, WU J H, CHEN K J, et al. Freshwater fish biodiversity in the Yangtze River basin of China: patterns, threats and conservation[J]. Biodivers Conserv, 2003, 12: 1649-1685. doi: 10.1023/A:1023697714517
    [13]
    袁延文. 坚决落实长江“十年禁渔”令, 确保在湖南落地见效[J]. 湖南农业, 2021(1): 1. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-362X.2021.01.001
    [14]
    李斌, 陈国宝, 郭禹, 等. 南海中部海域渔业资源时空分布和资源量的水声学评估[J]. 南方水产科学, 2016, 12(4): 28-37. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-0780.2016.04.004
    [15]
    黄朔, 李连翔, 刀微, 等. 泸沽湖鱼类空间分布特征分析与资源量评估[J]. 南方水产科学, 2020, 16(1): 53-61. doi: 10.12131/20190180
    [16]
    谭细畅, 史建全, 张宏, 等. EY60回声探测仪在青海湖鱼类资源量评估中的应用[J]. 湖泊科学, 2009, 21(6): 865-872. doi: 10.18307/2009.0617
    [17]
    孙明波, 谷孝鸿, 曾庆飞, 等. 基于水声学方法的天目湖鱼类季节和昼夜空间分布研究[J]. 生态学报, 2015, 35(17): 5597-5605.
    [18]
    陈文静, 贺刚, 吴斌, 等. 鄱阳湖通江水道鱼类空间分布特征及资源量评估[J]. 湖泊科学, 2017, 29(4): 923-931.
    [19]
    FOOTE K G. Fish target strengths for use in echo integrator surveys[J]. J Acoust Soc Am, 1987, 82(3): 981-987. doi: 10.1121/1.395298
    [20]
    BALK H. Development of hydroacoustic methods for fish detection in shallow water[D]. Norway: University of Oslo, 2001: 191-208.
    [21]
    刘艳佳, 高雷, 郑永华, 等. 洞庭湖通江水道鱼类资源的周年动态及其洄游特征研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2020, 29(2): 376-385.
    [22]
    BALK H, LINDEM T. Sonar 4, Sonar 5 post-processing systems operator manual version 5.9.8[M]. Oslo: University of Oslo, 2008: 192-196.
    [23]
    PETITGAS P. Geostatistics for fish stock assessments: a review and an acoustic application[J]. ICES J Mar Sci, 1993, 50(3): 285-298. doi: 10.1006/jmsc.1993.1031
    [24]
    LI X, CHENG G D, LU L. Comparison of spatial interpolation methods[J]. Adv Earthen, 2000, 15(3): 260-265.
    [25]
    BLABER S J, BLABER T G. Factors affecting the distribution of juvenile estuarine and inshore fish[J]. J Fish Biol, 1980, 17(2): 143-162. doi: 10.1111/j.1095-8649.1980.tb02749.x
    [26]
    HOLLES S, SIMPSON S D, RADFORD A N, et al. Boat noise disrupts orientation behaviour in a coral reef fish[J]. Mar Ecol Prog Ser, 2013, 485: 295-300. doi: 10.3354/meps10346
    [27]
    蒋万祥, 赖子尼, 庞世勋, 等. 珠江口叶绿素a时空分布及初级生产力[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2010, 26(2): 132-136. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-4831.2010.02.007
    [28]
    周磊, 李育森, 施军, 等. 基于水声学探测的洪潮江水库鱼类资源空间分布及其与环境因子的相关性[J]. 渔业科学进展. 2021, 42(1): 1-10.
    [29]
    李胜男, 熊丽萍, 彭华, 等. 东洞庭湖浮游藻类粒级结构组成及其关键影响因子[J]. 湖泊科学, 2020, 32(5): 1508-1518. doi: 10.18307/2020.0522
    [30]
    FERNANDAS C C, PODOS J, LUNDBERG J C. Amazonian ecology: tributaries enhance the diversity of electric fishes[J]. Science, 2004, 305(5692): 1960-1962. doi: 10.1126/science.1101240
    [31]
    TAVERNINI, D A, RICHARDSON J S. Effects of tributary size on the resource supply and physical habitat at tributary junctions along two mainstem rivers[J]. Can J Fish Aquat Sci, 2020, 77(8): 1393-1408. doi: 10.1139/cjfas-2019-0435
    [32]
    傅园园, 黄河仙, 张琦, 等. 东洞庭湖浮游藻类群落的结构特征及物种多样性分析[J]. 生命科学研究, 2016, 20(1): 8-15.
    [33]
    段辛斌, 刘绍平, 熊飞, 等. 长江上游干流春季禁渔前后三年渔获物结构和生物多样性分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(6): 878-885. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-8227.2008.06.010
    [34]
    张敏莹, 徐东坡, 刘凯, 等. 长江安庆江段鱼类调查及物种多样性初步研究[J]. 湖泊科学, 2006, 18(6): 670-676. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1003-5427.2006.06.017
    [35]
    徐东坡, 张敏莹, 刘凯, 等. 长江安庆江段春禁前后渔业生物 多样性的变化[J]. 安徽农业大学学报, 2006, 33(1): 76-80. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-352X.2006.01.017
    [36]
    武智, 谭细畅, 李新辉, 等. 珠江首次禁渔西江段鱼类资源声学跟踪监测分析[J]. 南方水产科学, 2014, 10(3): 24-28. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-0780.2014.03.004
    • Related Articles

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(25)

    1. 张进伟，胡晓，陈胜军，赵永强，吴燕燕，王悦齐，潘创，王迪. 腌制风干过程中卵形鲳鲹鱼肉性质、蛋白质氧化及游离氨基酸的变化. 食品科学. 2022(18): 272-278 .
    2. 罗静，李敏，关志强. 预处理及级联干燥在热泵干燥食品中的应用. 食品研究与开发. 2020(09): 177-181 .
    3. 薛山. 蓝圆鲹高值化利用现状及趋势展望. 保鲜与加工. 2020(03): 226-232 .
    4. 熊添，吴燕燕，陈胜军，胡晓，杨贤庆，王悦齐，杨少玲. 不同热加工方式对卵形鲳鲹肌肉蛋白及品质的影响. 食品与发酵工业. 2020(12): 179-185 .
    5. 石慧，吴燕燕，胡晓，陈胜军，王悦齐，荣辉，杨少玲. 灰色关联度法综合评价卵形鲳鲹鱼片不同干制方法的品质差异. 食品与发酵工业. 2020(17): 166-173 .
    6. 吴佰林，薛勇，李兆杰，薛长湖. 温度模式对鲅鱼热泵干燥品质及动力学特性的影响. 食品工业科技. 2019(04): 86-92+99 .
    7. 石慧，杨少玲，吴燕燕，林婉玲，杨贤庆，黄卉. 卵形鲳鲹鱼片热风干燥条件优化及其品质特性研究. 食品与发酵工业. 2019(17): 129-135 .
    8. 林家辉，章学来，张振涛. 水产品热泵干燥技术综述. 制冷与空调. 2019(09): 1-4+11 .
    9. 王卫，余静，张佳敏，吉莉莉，白婷，陈林，张崟. 天然植物提取物替代硝盐对腌腊鱼产品特性的影响. 成都大学学报(自然科学版). 2019(04): 375-378 .
    10. 熊添，吴燕燕，林婉玲，胡晓，陈胜军，荣辉. 即食调味金鲳鱼工艺技术研究. 食品工业科技. 2018(13): 180-186 .
    11. 吴燕燕，曹松敏，李来好，杨贤庆，林婉玲，陈胜军. 蓝圆鰺腌干工艺中组织蛋白酶与游离氨基酸和滋味形成的关系. 食品科学. 2018(04): 13-19 .
    12. 何雄，罗海波，陈伟，江凯，周静峰，王锦富. 风味即食对虾干系列产品加工工艺参数的优化. 食品研究与开发. 2018(05): 95-99 .
    13. 吴燕燕，曹松敏，李来好，杨贤庆，王锦旭，胡晓. 比较2种蓝圆鰺腌干工艺中脂质氧化与挥发性风味物质形成的关系. 食品科学. 2017(06): 165-172 .
    14. 王悦齐，吴燕燕，李来好，杨贤庆，王锡昌，蔡秋杏，赵永强，魏涯. 抗氧化乳酸菌对发酵腌干带鱼脂肪氧化的影响及其主成分分析. 食品科学. 2017(08): 231-238 .
    15. 吴燕燕，赵志霞，李来好，杨贤庆. 传统腌制鱼类产品加工技术的研究现状与发展趋势. 中国渔业质量与标准. 2017(03): 1-7 .
    16. 耿胜荣，曹欣欣，李新，白婵，李海蓝，鉏晓艳，廖涛. 盐渍和干燥工艺处理对风味草鱼块品质的影响. 湖北农业科学. 2016(21): 5598-5601 .
    17. 廖玉璠，陈杨华. 太阳能蓄热型热泵在玫瑰花联产中的节能特性. 南昌大学学报(工科版). 2016(01): 79-83 .
    18. 王悦齐，李来好，蔡秋杏，吴燕燕，王锡昌，杨贤庆，赵永强. 分离自腌干鱼的抗氧化发酵菌株的筛选及鉴定. 南方水产科学. 2016(03): 74-83 . 本站查看
    19. 吴燕燕，王悦齐，李来好，王锡昌，杨贤庆，蔡秋杏，赵永强，辛少平. 基于电子鼻与HS-SPME-GC-MS技术分析不同处理方式腌干带鱼挥发性风味成分. 水产学报. 2016(12): 1931-1940 .
    20. 钱茜茜，吴燕燕，魏涯，林婉玲，戚勃，荣辉. 海鲈鱼腌制过程中产胺菌的分离筛选与生物学特性研究. 食品与发酵工业. 2016(01): 70-75 .
    21. 吴燕燕，曹松敏，魏涯，杨贤庆. 腌制鱼类中内源性酶类对制品品质影响的研究进展. 食品工业科技. 2016(08): 358-363 .
    22. 吴燕燕，钱茜茜，陈玉峰，杨贤庆，邓建朝. 咸鱼中生物胺降解菌的筛选与降解特性研究. 食品工业科技. 2016(18): 173-179 .
    23. 吴燕燕，钱茜茜，李来好，邓建朝，杨贤庆，陈胜军，林婉玲. 3种添加物对咸鱼加工贮藏过程中生物胺的抑制效果. 食品科学. 2016(18): 190-196 .
    24. 陈胜军，杨贤庆，李来好，吴燕燕，樊丽琴，戚勃，胡晓，王安凤. 不同盐度腌制对蓝圆鲹相关理化特性的影响. 现代食品科技. 2015(12): 291-295+317 .
    25. 陈胜军，杨贤庆，李来好，吴燕燕，樊丽琴，戚勃，邓建朝，胡晓. 蓝圆鲹在腌制过程中N-二甲基亚硝胺和N-二乙基亚硝胺的变化规律. 食品与发酵工业. 2015(11): 59-63 .

    Other cited types(17)

Catalog

    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML
    Article views (813) PDF downloads (91) Cited by(42)
    Related

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co., Ltd.  

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return