Volume 18 Issue 4
Aug.  2022
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Abstract
References
Related Articles
ZHANG Qian, GUI Jinsong, REN Xiaozhong, XUE Boru, BI Chunwei, LIU Ying. Optimization of flow field in dual-drain square aquaculture tank with relative arc to width ratio[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2022, 18(4): 119-125. DOI: 10.12131/20210044
Citation: ZHANG Qian, GUI Jinsong, REN Xiaozhong, XUE Boru, BI Chunwei, LIU Ying. Optimization of flow field in dual-drain square aquaculture tank with relative arc to width ratio[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2022, 18(4): 119-125. DOI: 10.12131/20210044
shu

Optimization of flow field in dual-drain square aquaculture tank with relative arc to width ratio

  • 1.

    Key Laboratory of Environment Controlled Aquaculture (Dalian Ocean University), Ministry of Education, Dalian 116023, China

  • 2.

    College of Ocean and Civil Engineering, Dalian Ocean University, Dalian 116023, China

  • 3.

    Dalian University of Technology/State Key Laboratory of Coastal and Offshore Engineering, Dalian 116024, China

More Information
  • Received Date: January 21, 2021
  • Revised Date: November 21, 2021
  • Accepted Date: November 28, 2021
  • Available Online: December 15, 2021
    Graphical Abstract
    • Abstract
  • In order to improve the flow field characteristics in dual-drain square aquaculture tank, we combined arc angle and straight edge to optimize the flow field, so as to provide better aquaculture equipment for the recirculating aquaculture industry. We applied computational fluid dynamics technology to simulate the flow field in dual-drain aquaculture tanks, and evaluated the effect of relative arc to width ratio (R/B, R is the radius of arc angle, B is the side length of tank wall) on the flow field characteristics in the tanks by analyzing corrected velocity v0 and uniformity coefficient UC50. The results show a same rule under different conditions of underflow split ratio (The percentage of outflow from the center outlet at the bottom of the tank in the total outflow). The average velocity in the square arc angle aquaculture tanks with 0.2≤R/B<0.4 was about twice than that in the square aquaculture tanks for the same water exchange rate, but there was no significant difference compared with the circular aquaculture tanks. According to the analysis of flow field uniformity, the square arc angle aquaculture tanks with 0.2≤R/B<0.4 had higher uniformity coefficient, and even higher than that of circular aquaculture tanks. The research indicates that the area of lower velocity caused by the right angle in the square aquaculture tanks reduced effectively by the arc angle in the square arc angle aquaculture tanks, and higher space utilization rate was retained. The advantages of the square aquaculture tank and the circular aquaculture tank are fully combined in the square arc angle aquaculture tank, which solves the problem of poor flow pattern in dual-drain square aquaculture tank, with good industrial popularization and application value.
    • FullText(HTML)
    • References (38)
  • [1]
    ALMANSA C, REIG L, OCA J. Use of laser scanning to evaluate turbot (Scophthalmus maximus) distribution in raceways with different water velocities[J]. Aquac Eng, 2012, 51: 7-14. doi: 10.1016/j.aquaeng.2012.04.002
    [2]
    ROSS R M, WATTEN B J, KRISE W F, et al. Influence of tank design and hydraulic loading on the behavior, growth and metabolism of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss)[J]. Aquac Eng, 1995, 14: 29-47. doi: 10.1016/0144-8609(94)P4425-B
    [3]
    王江竹, 宛立, 任效忠, 等. 循环水养殖中水动力特性对鱼类影响的研究进展[J]. 水产科学, 2020, 39(3): 458-464.
    [4]
    DUARTE S, REIG L, MASALÓ I, et al. Influence of tank geometry and flow pattern in fish distribution[J]. Aquac Eng, 2011, 44: 48-54. doi: 10.1016/j.aquaeng.2010.12.002
    [5]
    秦抱元, 刘鹰. 澳大利亚海洋渔业工程发展概况与中澳海洋渔业合作前景分析[J]. 农业工程学报, 2020, 36(11): 318-326. doi: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2020.11.038
    [6]
    OCA J, MASALÓ I. Design criteria for rotating flow cells in rectangular aquaculture tanks[J]. Aquac Eng, 2007, 36: 36-44. doi: 10.1016/j.aquaeng.2006.06.001
    [7]
    ELALOUF H, KASPI M, ELALOUF A, et al. Optimal operation policy for a sustainable recirculation aquaculture system for ornamental fish: simulation and response surface methodology[J]. Comput Oper Res, 2018, 89: 230-240. doi: 10.1016/j.cor.2017.05.002
    [8]
    FARGHALLY H M, ATIA D M, EL-MADANY H T, et al. Control methodologies based on geothermal recirculating aquaculture system[J]. Energy, 2014, 78: 826-833. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2014.10.077
    [9]
    LABATUT R A, EBELING J M, BHASKARAN R, et al. Hydrodynamics of a large-scale mixed-cell raceway (MCR): experimental studies[J]. Aquac Eng, 2007, 37: 132-143. doi: 10.1016/j.aquaeng.2007.04.001
    [10]
    LABATUT R A, EBELING J M, BHASKARAN R, et al. Effects of inlet and outlet flow characteristics on mixed-cell raceway (MCR) hydrodynamics[J]. Aquac Eng, 2007, 37: 158-170. doi: 10.1016/j.aquaeng.2007.04.002
    [11]
    于林平, 薛博茹, 任效忠, 等. 单进水管结构对单通道方形圆弧角养殖池水动力特性的影响研究[J]. 大连海洋大学学报, 2020, 35(1): 134-140.
    [12]
    任效忠, 薛博茹, 姜恒志, 等. 双进水管系统对单通道矩形圆弧角养殖池水动力特性影响的数值研究[J]. 海洋环境科学, 2021, 40(1): 50-56. doi: 10.12111/j.mes.20190234
    [13]
    任效忠, 王江竹, 张倩, 等. 方形圆弧角养殖池进水结构对流场影响的试验研究[J]. 大连海洋大学学报, 2020, 35(5): 726-732.
    [14]
    GORLE J M R, TERJESEN B F, SUMMERFELT S T. Hydrodynamics of octagonal culture tanks with Cornell-type dual-drain system[J]. Comput Electron Agric, 2018, 151: 354-364. doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2018.06.012
    [15]
    PFEIFFER T J, RICHE M A. Evaluation of a low-head Recirculating Aquaculture System used for rearing Florida pompano to market size[J]. J World Aquac Soc, 2011, 42(2): 198-208. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-7345.2011.00456.x
    [16]
    TERJESEN B F, SUMMERFELT S T, NERLAND S, et al. Design, dimensioning, and performance of a research facility for studies on the requirements of fish in RAS environments[J]. Aquac Eng, 2013, 54: 49-63. doi: 10.1016/j.aquaeng.2012.11.002
    [17]
    CARVALHO R A P L F, LEMOS D E L, TACONB A G J. Performance of single-drain and dual-drain tanks in terms of water velocity profile and solids flushing for in vivo digestibility studies in juvenile shrimp[J]. Aquac Eng, 2013, 57: 9-17. doi: 10.1016/j.aquaeng.2013.05.004
    [18]
    SUMMERFELT S T, MATHISEN F, HOLAN A B, et al. Survey of large circular and octagonal tanks operated at Norwegian commercial smolt and post-smolt sites[J]. Aquac Eng, 2016, 74: 105-110. doi: 10.1016/j.aquaeng.2016.07.004
    [19]
    史明明, 阮贇杰, 刘晃, 等. 基于CFD的循环生物絮团系统养殖池固相分布均匀性评价[J]. 农业工程学报, 2017, 33(2): 252-258. doi: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2017.02.035
    [20]
    GORLE J M R, TERJESEN B F, MOTA V C, et al. Water velocity in commercial RAS culture tanks for Atlantic salmon smolt production[J]. Aquac Eng, 2018, 81: 89-100. doi: 10.1016/j.aquaeng.2018.03.001
    [21]
    KLEBERT P, VOLENT Z, ROSTEN T. Measurement and simulation of the three-dimensional flow pattern and particle removal efficiencies in a large floating closed sea cage with multiple inlets and drains[J]. Aquac Eng, 2018, 80: 11-21. doi: 10.1016/j.aquaeng.2017.11.001
    [22]
    刘志强, 许柳雄, 唐浩, 等. 不同工作姿态下立式双曲面网板水动力及周围流场特性研究[J]. 南方水产科学, 2020, 16(2): 87-98.
    [23]
    薛博茹, 姜恒志, 任效忠, 等. 进径比对方形圆弧角养殖池内流场特性的影响研究[J]. 渔业现代化, 2020, 47(4): 20-27. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-9580.2020.04.004
    [24]
    LABATUT R A, EBELING J M, BHASKARAN R, et al. Exploring flow discharge strategies of a mixed-cell raceway (MCR) using 2-D computational fluid dynamics (CFD)[J]. Aquac Eng, 2015, 66: 68-77. doi: 10.1016/j.aquaeng.2015.01.001
    [25]
    LABATUT R A, EBELING J M, BHASKARAN R, et al. Modeling hydrodynamics and path/residence time of aquaculture-like particles in a mixed-cell raceway (MCR) using 3D computational fluid dynamics (CFD)[J]. Aquac Eng, 2015, 67: 39-52. doi: 10.1016/j.aquaeng.2015.05.006
    [26]
    BEHROOZI L, COUTURIER M F. Prediction of water velocities in circular aquaculture tanks using an axisymmetric CFD model[J]. Aquac Eng, 2019, 85: 114-128. doi: 10.1016/j.aquaeng.2019.03.005
    [27]
    LIU Y, LIU B, LEI J, et al. Numerical simulation of the hydrodynamics within octagonal tanks in recirculating aquaculture systems[J]. Chin J Oceanol Limnol, 2017, 35(4): 912-920. doi: 10.1007/s00343-017-6051-3
    [28]
    桂劲松, 张倩, 任效忠, 等. 圆弧角优化对单通道方形养殖池流场特性的影响研究[J]. 大连海洋大学学报, 2020, 35(2): 308-316.
    [29]
    俞国燕, 魏武, 王筱珍, 等. 双通道养殖池流态模拟及验证[J]. 渔业现代化, 2012, 39(6): 10-14. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-9580.2012.06.003
    [30]
    DAVIDSON J, SUMMERFELT S. Solids flushing, mixing, and water velocity profiles within large (10 and 150 m3) circular 'Cornell-type' dual-drain tanks[J]. Aquac Eng, 2004, 32: 245-271. doi: 10.1016/j.aquaeng.2004.03.009
    [31]
    魏武. 循环水圆形养殖池数值模拟及结构优化[D]. 湛江: 广东海洋大学, 2013: 28-31.
    [32]
    张倩, 桂劲松, 薛博茹, 等. 双通道排水系统对矩形圆弧角养殖池流场特性的影响研究[J]. 渔业现代化, 2020, 47(6): 19-25. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-9580.2020.06.004
    [33]
    WATTEN B J, HONEYFIELD D C, SCHWARTZ M F. Hydraulic characteristics of a rectangular mixed-cell rearing unit[J]. Aquac Eng, 2000, 24: 59-73. doi: 10.1016/S0144-8609(00)00064-9
    [34]
    OCA J, MASALÓ I, REIG L. Comparative analysis of flow patterns in aquaculture rectangular tanks with different water inlet characteristics[J]. Aquac Eng, 2004, 31: 221-236. doi: 10.1016/j.aquaeng.2004.04.002
    [35]
    MASALÓ I, OCA J. Hydrodynamics in a multivortex aquaculture tank: effect of baffles and water inlet characteristics[J]. Aquac Eng, 2014, 58: 69-76. doi: 10.1016/j.aquaeng.2013.11.001
    [36]
    LUNGER A, RASMUSSEN M R, LAURSEN J, et al. Fish stocking density impacts tank hydrodynamics[J]. Aquaculture, 2006, 254: 370-375. doi: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2005.10.023
    [37]
    RASMUSSEN M R, LAURSEN J, CRAIG, S R, et al. Do fish enhance tank mixing?[J]. Aquaculture, 2005, 250: 162-174. doi: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2005.02.041
    [38]
    MASALÓ I, OCA J. Influence of fish swimming on the flow pattern of circular tanks[J]. Aquac Eng, 2016, 74: 84-95. doi: 10.1016/j.aquaeng.2016.07.001
    • Related Articles

  • Related Articles

    [1]CHEN Yuanshuai, PANG Guoliang, HUANG Xiaohua, LI Gen, YUAN Taiping, HU Yu, TAO Qiyou. Influence of net on structural response of jack-up truss net cage[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2024, 20(1): 43-53. DOI: 10.12131/20230213
    [2]XING Wang, HUANG Xiaohua, LI Gen, PANG Guoliang, YUAN Taiping. Construction of a dynamics simulation system for net cleaning robot based on Gazebo[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2024, 20(1): 1-10. DOI: 10.12131/20230189
    [3]FAN Xiaoxu, LIN Shen, LIU Dan, TIAN Wei, JIANG Mei, LI Lei. Study on adhesion characteristics of fouling organisms of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene and copper alloys mesh[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2023, 19(6): 30-37. DOI: 10.12131/20230135
    [4]YUAN Taiping, HU Yu, WANG Shaoming, LIAO Yuqi, TAO Qiyou, HUANG Xiaohua, LIU Haiyang, GUO Gengxi. Research on performance of cavitation jet equipment for deep-water cage cleaning[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2021, 17(4): 109-117. DOI: 10.12131/20210027
    [5]ZHANG Wei, LI Chunhou, JIA Xiaoping, CHEN Pimao, FANG Liang. Seasonal variation of biofouling communities on concrete[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2015, 11(1): 9-17. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-0780.2015.01.002
    [6]HU Yu, GUO Genxi, HUANG Xiaohua, TAO Qiyou, ZHANG Xiaoming. Simulation of flow field inside the net cleaning machine based on ANSYS[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2010, 6(1): 7-11. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-2227.2010.01.002
    [7]SHUI Bo-nian, GUO Di-fei. Seasonal variation analysis of fouling organisms on offshore cages in Zhoushan[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2008, 4(4): 36-41.
    [8]HU Yu, GUO Gen-xi, HUANG Xiao-hua, TAO Qi-you. Nozzle design of high-pressure free-jet-type submarine net cleaning machine[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2008, 4(4): 16-20.
    [9]GUO Gen-xi, TAO Qi-you. Performance analysis of the column cod-end and truncated cone cod-end of deep-water net cage[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2005, 1(4): 24-29.
    [10]GUO Gen-xi, TAO Qi-you. Design and making of truncated cone cod-end of deep-water net cage[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2005, 1(1): 49-53.

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(6)

    1. 徐菲，徐开达，张洪亮，卢占晖，周永东，李羽如，叶莹莹，马文静，金梓慧. 浙江岱衢洋海域春秋季游泳动物群落结构及生物量粒径谱特征. 海洋与湖沼. 2025(01): 165-174 .
    2. Zhisen LUO，Murong YI，Xiaodong YANG，Xiao CHEN，Jinxi WANG，Changping JIANG，Fengming LIU，Konglan LUO，Xiongbo HE，Hung-Du LIN，Bin KANG，Yunrong YAN. Checklist of marine fishes in the Beibu Gulf: fish classification, resource protection, and biodiversity challenge. Journal of Oceanology and Limnology. 2025(01): 232-247 .
    3. 李诗佳，施利燕，钟俊生，赵路路. 长江口南部水域春、秋季鱼类群落结构比较. 上海海洋大学学报. 2024(01): 135-149 .
    4. 李淼，许友伟，孙铭帅，范江涛，李佳俊，张魁，陈作志. 拉尼娜事件前后北部湾鱼类群落结构变化研究. 南方水产科学. 2023(02): 1-11 . 本站查看
    5. Chenyu Song，Zhong Tu，Na Song. Discordant patterns of genetic variation between mitochondrial and microsatellite markers in Acanthogobius ommaturus across the coastal areas of China. Acta Oceanologica Sinica. 2023(04): 72-80 .
    6. 王鑫，李昌文，徐加涛，李士虎，宋可心，唐佳伟，马晓娜，冯志华. 灌河口海域水生动物群落结构及分布特征. 江苏海洋大学学报(自然科学版). 2023(04): 29-41 .

    Other cited types(7)

Catalog

    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML
    Article views PDF downloads Cited by(13)
    Related

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co., Ltd.  

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return