Volume 17 Issue 4
Aug.  2021
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Abstract
References
Related Articles
YUAN Taiping, HU Yu, WANG Shaoming, LIAO Yuqi, TAO Qiyou, HUANG Xiaohua, LIU Haiyang, GUO Gengxi. Research on performance of cavitation jet equipment for deep-water cage cleaning[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2021, 17(4): 109-117. DOI: 10.12131/20210027
Citation: YUAN Taiping, HU Yu, WANG Shaoming, LIAO Yuqi, TAO Qiyou, HUANG Xiaohua, LIU Haiyang, GUO Gengxi. Research on performance of cavitation jet equipment for deep-water cage cleaning[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2021, 17(4): 109-117. DOI: 10.12131/20210027
shu

Research on performance of cavitation jet equipment for deep-water cage cleaning

  • 1.

    South China Sea Fisheries Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences/Key Laboratory of Open-Sea Fishery Development, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs/Guangdong Cage Engineering Research Center, Guangzhou 510300, China

  • 2.

    College of Marine Sciences, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai 201306, China

More Information
  • Received Date: January 13, 2021
  • Revised Date: April 28, 2021
  • Accepted Date: May 09, 2021
  • Available Online: May 13, 2021
    Graphical Abstract
    • Abstract
  • To study the cleaning mechanism and influence factors affecting of fouling organisms attached to cage net, we applied numerical simulation method and prototype testing to investigate the biofouling removal rate of cleaning equipment with different inlet pressures and nozzle diameters, and then explored the biofouling removal mechanism of aquaculture net cage under the action of cavitation jet. The numerical simulation results show that the maximum gas volume fraction of nozzle showed an increasing trend when the nozzle diameter was 0.6−1.0 mm under rated flow, and the maximum gas volume fraction value of d=1.0 mm nozzle was 37.5%. The flow velocity of the jet 40 mm away from the nozzle outlet decreased by 85.57%−96.98%, and the velocity of the nozzle decreased significantly in submerged environment. Further water tank cleaning test results show that when the input pressure was 18.8 MPa and the diameter value of nozzle was 0.8 mm, the largest cleaning rate of aquaculture nets of the cleaning equipment was 79.76%. The shellfish fouling organisms mainly fell off in the form of shell breaking under the impact of cavitation jet of cleaning equipment. After the cleaning, most of the residues was the soft foot silk tray of shellfish with strong adsorption. The soil on the surface of the net was completely removed and presented the primary color of the breeding net.
    • FullText(HTML)
    • References (33)
  • [1]
    房熊. 一种新型水下网箱清洗机器人的设计探索[J]. 机电设备, 2020, 37(6): 57-60.
    [2]
    URAZMETOV O, CDEET M, TEUTSCH R, et al. Investigation of the flow phenomena in high-pressure water jet nozzles[J]. Chem Eng Res Des, 2021, 165: 320-332. doi: 10.1016/j.cherd.2020.10.030
    [3]
    刘冠灵, 卫泓宇, 李志鹏, 等. 履带式深海网箱清洗机器人的设计[J]. 机械制造, 2019, 57(4): 11-14. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-4998.2019.04.004
    [4]
    彭安华, 刘成文, 陆波. 一种带有清洗装置和数据采集系统的深水网箱[J]. 南方农业, 2016, 10(3): 169-171. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-890X.2016.03.101
    [5]
    WANG Z, DAI X, LIU F, et al. Microscopic study on the mechanisms for formation of the initial spray morphology[J]. Fuel, 2019, 235: 715-722. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2018.08.069
    [6]
    满晓东, 宋协法, 黄志涛, 等. 转盘式网箱清洗装置设计与模拟试验[J]. 渔业现代化, 2019, 46(6): 22-28.
    [7]
    Equipment Power. Yanmar net cleanerr[EB/OL]. [2021-01-03]. https://www.powerequipment.com.au/products/yanmar-net-cleaner/.
    [8]
    OCEAN F S. Rov services [EB/OL]. [2020-08-11]. https://www.oceanfarmservices.com/services/rov.
    [9]
    庄集超, 庞洪臣, 刘子浪, 等. 一种新型深海网箱网衣清洗机器人设计[J]. 机器人技术, 2018, 45(1): 72-75.
    [10]
    张小明, 詹春毅. 水射流式水下洗网机清洗囊网的效率研究[J]. 机电工程技术, 2018, 47(4): 52-54. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-9492.2018.04.017
    [11]
    张小明, 郭根喜, 陶启友, 等. 高压射流水下洗网机旋转的瞬态射流打击力研究[J]. 现代制造工程, 2011(5): 21-25. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-3133.2011.05.007
    [12]
    张小明, 郭根喜, 陶启友, 等. 歧管式高压射流水下洗网机的设计[J]. 南方水产, 2010, 6(3): 46-51. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-2227.2010.03.009
    [13]
    胡昱, 郭根喜, 黄小华, 等. 高压射流式水下洗网机喷嘴的设计[J]. 南方水产, 2008, 4(4): 16-20. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-0780.2008.04.003
    [14]
    刘海霞, 李秀阁, 张桃, 等. 射流压力对淹没水射流冲击与空蚀效果的影响[J]. 表面技术, 2016, 45(12): 104-110.
    [15]
    HUTLI E, NEDELJKOVIC M, BONYAR A. Dynamic behaviour of cavitation clouds: visualization and statistical analysis[J]. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Engin, 2019, 41(7): 281. doi: 10.1007/s40430-019-1777-9
    [16]
    PAN Y, MA F, LIU B, et al. Cavitation intensity and erosion pattern of a self-excited cavitating jet[J]. J Materials Proc Technol, 2020, 282: 116668. doi: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2020.116668
    [17]
    宋协法, 宋业垚, 万荣. 养殖网箱清洗设备的实验研究[J]. 中国水产科学, 2004, 11(增刊): 78-82.
    [18]
    宋协法, 贾瑞, 马玉霞. 涡旋水流式网箱清洗设备的设计与实验[J]. 中国海洋大学学报 (自然科学版), 2006, 36(5): 733-738.
    [19]
    崔谟慎, 孙家骏. 高压水射流技术[M]. 北京: 煤炭工业出版社, 1993: 145-147.
    [20]
    郭根喜, 黄小华, 胡昱, 等. 深水网箱理论研究与实践[M]. 北京: 海洋出版社, 2013: 161-162.
    [21]
    BI C, ZHAO Y, HAI G, et al. Drag on and flow through the hydroid-fouled nets in currents[J]. Ocean Engin, 2018, 161: 195-204. doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2018.05.005
    [22]
    袁太平, 胡昱, 王绍敏, 等. 喷嘴结构对网衣清洗装备水下空化特性的影响[J]. 水产学报, 2020, 45(2): 296-305.
    [23]
    袁太平, 胡昱, 王绍敏, 等. 养殖网箱网衣清洗设备喷嘴的设计及力学特性分析[J]. 渔业现代化, 2020, 47(2): 16-24. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-9580.2020.02.003
    [24]
    LI D, LIU S, WEI Y, et al. Numerical investigation on transient internal cavitating flow and spray[J]. Fuel, 2018, 233: 778-795. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2018.06.103
    [25]
    SALVADOR G P, FRANKEL S. Numerical modeling of cavitation using FLUENT: validation and parametric studies[C]. 34th AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference and Exhibit, Portland, Oregon, 2004: 2642.
    [26]
    PENG K, TIAN S, LI G, et al. Cavitation in water jet under high ambient pressure conditions[J]. Exp Therm Fluid Sci, 2017, 89: 9-18. doi: 10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2017.07.021
    [27]
    陈理. 空化射流喷嘴结构参数的优化[D]. 杭州: 浙江工业大学, 2017: 41-66.
    [28]
    舒爱艳, 石建高, 余雯雯, 等. 海水网箱网衣防污技术的研究进展[J]. 水产学报, 2020, 45(3): 472-485.
    [29]
    高焕, 王玉, 李光光, 等. 海水养殖设施防生物附着方法[J]. 水产养殖, 2018, 39(11): 33-34. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-2091.2018.11.012
    [30]
    吴文红, 黄金臣, 苏文清, 等. 唐山市京唐港海域海水网箱附着生物调查报告[J]. 河北渔业, 2010(9): 35-38. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-6755.2010.09.014
    [31]
    张伟, 李纯厚, 贾晓平, 等. 大亚湾混凝土鱼礁和铁质鱼礁附着生物群落结构的季节变化[J]. 南方水产科学, 2015, 11(1): 9-17. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-0780.2015.01.002
    [32]
    曹善茂, 张丛尧, 张国范, 等. 海洋贝类养殖网笼污损生物类群的研究[J]. 大连水产学院学报, 1998, 13(4): 3-5.
    [33]
    陈欣欣, 王川, 施卫东, 等. 不同冲击角度下淹没冲击水射流的数值计算[J]. 排灌机械工程学报, 2020, 38(7): 658-662.
    • Related Articles

  • Related Articles

    [1]ZHANG Chen, LIU Huang, ZHANG Chenglin, ZHANG Fan. Effect of water inflow methods on flow field and suitability for aquaculture in rectangular farming tanks[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2024, 20(6): 121-131. DOI: 10.12131/20240192
    [2]YUAN Taiping, LIAO Yuqi, HUANG Xiaohua, HU Yu, TAO Qiyou, LI Gen, PANG Guoliang. Design and experimental research on key components of net cleaning equipment for deep-water cage[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2024, 20(1): 25-33. DOI: 10.12131/20230214
    [3]ZHANG Qian, GUI Jinsong, REN Xiaozhong, XUE Boru, BI Chunwei, LIU Ying. Optimization of flow field in dual-drain square aquaculture tank with relative arc to width ratio[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2022, 18(4): 119-125. DOI: 10.12131/20210044
    [4]SUI Liuyang, HUANG Xiaohua, LIU Haiyang, HU Yu, YUAN Taiping, WANG Shaomin, TAO Qiyou. Effects of mooring pattern on dynamic characteristics of a deep-water aquaculture cage[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2021, 17(4): 98-108. DOI: 10.12131/20210049
    [5]WANG Jiamei, TANG Zhenzhao, DING Ling, JIA Xiaoping, ZHANG Zhongzhe. Study on local scour of artificial reef based on flume test[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2020, 16(6): 32-38. DOI: 10.12131/20200074
    [6]LIU Zhiqiang, XU Liuxiong, TANG Hao, HU Fuxiang, ZHOU Cheng. Hydrodynamic performance and around flow field of biplane-type otter board with different working positions[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2020, 16(2): 87-98. DOI: 10.12131/20190221
    [7]HU Yu, HUANG Xiaohua, TAO Qiyou, YUAN Taiping, WANG Shaomin, LIU Haiyang. Simulation of automatic pneumatic conveying process of automatic feeding system based on computational fluid dynamics-discrete element method[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2019, 15(3): 113-119. DOI: 10.12131/20180219
    [8]XU Maosen, LONG Xinping, ZHU Ye, LI Li, WU Ning, RUAN Xiaofeng. Research on grass carp conveyance performance of jet fish pump[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2017, 13(1): 117-123. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-0780.2017.001.015
    [9]ZHANG Peng, CHEN Sen, LI Jie, ZHANG Heng, YAN Lei, YANG Bingzhong. An experiment of tuna longline conducted by light falling-net fishing vessel[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2016, 12(4): 110-116. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-0780.2016.04.014
    [10]CAI Houcai, ZHUANG Dinggen, YE Peng, FU Huabiao, WANG Yinjuan. Net cage and cement tank culture of common Atlantic octopus Octopus vulgaris in Nanji Island, Zhejiang Province[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2007, 3(2): 66-70.

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(4)

    1. 袁太平，廖宇琦，黄小华，胡昱，陶启友，李根，庞国良. 深水网箱网衣清洗装备关键部件设计及试验. 南方水产科学. 2024(01): 25-33 . 本站查看
    2. 魏盛军，蔡文鸿，丁兰，张哲，张艺，潘柏霖，陈思源，杨章武，魏观渊，林元俊，郑国富. 福建海上养殖设施污损生物处理方式现状调查. 渔业研究. 2023(02): 147-154 .
    3. 黄小华，庞国良，袁太平，胡昱，王绍敏，郭根喜，陶启友. 我国深远海网箱养殖工程与装备技术研究综述. 渔业科学进展. 2022(06): 121-131 .
    4. 廖宇琦，袁太平，胡昱，王绍敏，陶启友，黄小华. 转盘流道结构对网箱清洗装备喷嘴流场特性的影响. 渔业现代化. 2021(06): 9-18 .

    Other cited types(3)

Catalog

    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML
    Article views (1112) PDF downloads (84) Cited by(7)
    Related

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co., Ltd.  

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return