Volume 17 Issue 5
Sep.  2021
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Abstract
References
Related Articles
Jiangtao LI, Kaiyu YANG, Xiaotong QIU, Junchao FANG, Feifei HUANG, Xiaolong QIU, Xiaojing LYU, Rishen LIANG, Qingqing LI, Li LIN. Comparison of growth and morphological characteristics of inbred and hybrid families of Micropterus salmoides from Foshan and Taiwan populations[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2021, 17(5): 1-9. DOI: 10.12131/20200262
Citation: Jiangtao LI, Kaiyu YANG, Xiaotong QIU, Junchao FANG, Feifei HUANG, Xiaolong QIU, Xiaojing LYU, Rishen LIANG, Qingqing LI, Li LIN. Comparison of growth and morphological characteristics of inbred and hybrid families of Micropterus salmoides from Foshan and Taiwan populations[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2021, 17(5): 1-9. DOI: 10.12131/20200262
shu

Comparison of growth and morphological characteristics of inbred and hybrid families of Micropterus salmoides from Foshan and Taiwan populations

  • 1.

    College of Animal Science and Technology, Zhongkai University of Agriculture and Engineering/Guangzhou Key Laboratory of Aquatic Animal Diseases and Waterfowl Breeding, Guangzhou 510225, China

  • 2.

    College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Zhongkai University of Agriculture and Engineering, Guangzhou 510225, China

More Information
  • Received Date: December 24, 2020
  • Revised Date: February 21, 2021
  • Accepted Date: March 22, 2021
  • Available Online: April 12, 2021
    Graphical Abstract
    • Abstract
  • Taking Foshan and Taiwan populations of Micropterus salmoides as parents, we established four populations including Foshan inbreeding group (Foshan ♀×Foshan ♂), Taiwan inbreeding group (Taiwan ♀×Taiwan ♂), normal progeny (Foshan ♀×Taiwan ♂) and reciprocal progeny (Taiwan ♀×Foshan ♂) , and carried out a 6-month experiment, in order to compare their growth and morphological characteristics. Results show that the growth performance and coefficient of variation for body mass were significantly higher in the hybid groups than in the two inbred groups. The results of morphological analysis show that the morphological differences of the four populations were mainly in the middle part of trunk and tail. The contribution rate of the first three principal components was 92.9%, and that of the first principal component was 71.3%, mainly reflecting the morphological characteristics of the front and middle part of the body. The contribution rate of the second principal component was 16.6%, reflecting the characteristics of the tail region of fish body. In the scatter plot of the scores of the first two principal components, the four populations could be completely distinguished due to the low overlap area. The stepwise discriminant model constructed by combining measurable traits and frame traits showed the highest accuracy (86.7%–96.0%). The results provide references for the growth and morphological identification of hybrid families of M. salmoides from Foshan and Taiwan populations.
    • FullText(HTML)
    • References (29)
  • [1]
    FAN J, BAI J, MA D. Isolation and characterization of 40 SNP in largemouth bass (Micropterus salmoides)[J]. Conserv Genet Res, 2020, 12(1): 57-60. doi: 10.1007/s12686-018-1076-2
    [2]
    MA H J, MOU M M, PU D C, et al. Effect of dietary starch level on growth, metabolism enzyme and oxidative status of juvenile largemouth bass, Micropterus salmoides[J]. Aquaculture, 2019, 498: 482-487. doi: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2018.07.039
    [3]
    王佩佩, 周国勤, 陈树桥. 大口黑鲈北方亚种, 佛罗里达亚种及“优鲈3号”杂交F1子代生长性能及遗传多样性分析[J]. 海洋渔业, 2020, 42(4): 403-409. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-2490.2020.04.003
    [4]
    梁素娴, 孙效文, 白俊杰, 等. 微卫星标记对中国引进加州鲈养殖群体遗传多样性的分析[J]. 水生生物学报. 2008, 32(5): 694-700.
    [5]
    樊佳佳, 白俊杰, 李胜杰, 等. 大口黑鲈微卫星DNA指纹图谱的构建和遗传结构分析[J]. 水生生物学报, 2012, 36(4): 600-609.
    [6]
    梁素娴, 白俊杰, 叶星, 等. 养殖大口黑鲈的遗传多样性分析[J]. 大连水产学院学报, 2007, 22(4): 260-263.
    [7]
    朱新平, 杜合军, 郑光明, 等. 大口黑鲈养殖群体遗传多样性的分析[J]. 大连水产学院学报, 2006, 21(4): 341-345. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-9957.2006.04.010
    [8]
    卢建峰, 白俊杰, 李胜杰, 等. 大口黑鲈选育群体遗传多样性的AFLP分析[J]. 淡水渔业, 2010, 40(3): 3-7. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6907.2010.03.001
    [9]
    孙成飞, 谢汶峰, 胡婕, 等. 大口黑鲈3个养殖群体的遗传多样性分析[J]. 南方水产科学, 2019, 15 (2): 64-71. doi: 10.12131/20180203
    [10]
    刘海涌, 李胜杰, 白俊杰. 大口黑鲈养殖群体和引进群体生长性能的比较分析[J]. 水产养殖, 2015, 36(9): 1-5. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-2091.2015.09.001
    [11]
    HWANG E K, YOTSUKURA N, PANG S J, et al. Seaweed breeding programs and progress in eastern Asian countries[J]. Phycologia, 2019, 58(5): 484-495. doi: 10.1080/00318884.2019.1639436
    [12]
    FARRÉ M, LOMBARTE A, RECASENS L, et al. Habitat influence in the morphological diversity of coastal fish assemblages[J]. J Sea Res, 2015, 99: 107-117. doi: 10.1016/j.seares.2015.03.002
    [13]
    苟盼盼, 王秀利, 窦冬雨, 等. 红鳍东方鲀不同家系群体的形态性状差异与相关性分析[J]. 大连海洋大学学报, 2019, 34(5): 674-679.
    [14]
    李江涛, 林小涛, 周晨辉, 等. 实验室条件下唐鱼两性异形及其与游泳能力关系[J]. 应用生态学报, 2016, 27(5): 1639-1646.
    [15]
    周家辉, 李胜杰, 姜鹏. 大口黑鲈北方亚种群体和“优鲈1号”群体及其正反杂交子代的遗传和生长性能比较[J]. 海洋渔业, 2020, 42(3): 324. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-2490.2020.03.008
    [16]
    黄建盛, 陈刚, 张健东, 等. 褐点石斑鱼不同月龄形态性状的主成分及通径分析[J]. 水产学报, 2017, 41(7): 1105-1115.
    [17]
    韩慧宗, 姜海滨, 王斐, 等. 许氏平鲉不同月龄选育群体形态性状的主成分与通径分析[J]. 水产学报, 2016, 40(8): 1163-1172.
    [18]
    周惠强, 李芬, 舒琥, 等. 大刺鳅雌雄个体形态差异分析[J]. 广东海洋大学学报, 2019, 39(1): 1-6.
    [19]
    马爱军, 王新安, 孙志宾, 等. 红鳍东方鲀 (Takifugu rubripes) 三个不同群体的形态差异分析[J]. 海洋与湖沼, 2016, 47(1): 166-172.
    [20]
    蔡磊, 白俊杰, 李胜杰, 等. 大口黑鲈北方亚种, 佛罗里达亚种及其杂交子代的生长和形态差异分析[J]. 水产学报, 2012, 36(6): 801-808.
    [21]
    王炳谦, 谷伟, 贾钟贺, 等. 4个品系虹鳟生产性能的比较[J]. 大连水产学院学报, 2007, 22(3): 170-174. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-9957.2007.03.003
    [22]
    李思发, 蔡完其. 团头鲂双向选育效应研究[J]. 水产学报, 2000, 24(3): 201-205.
    [23]
    孙龙芳, 李姣, 梁旭方, 等. 翘嘴鳜F3~F5群体选育效果分析[J]. 广东农业科学, 2014, 41(13): 114-118. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-874X.2014.13.025
    [24]
    周劲松, 曹哲明, 杨国梁, 等. 罗氏沼虾缅甸引进种和浙江本地种及其杂交种的生长性能与 SRAP 分析[J]. 中国水产科学, 2006, 13(4): 667-673. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1005-8737.2006.04.025
    [25]
    陈林, 李思发, 简伟业, 等. 吉奥罗非鱼 (新吉富罗非鱼♀×奥利亚罗非鱼♂) 生长性能的评估[J]. 上海水产大学学报, 2008, 17(3): 257-262.
    [26]
    王新安, 马爱军, 陈超, 等. 七带石斑鱼 (Epinephelus septemfasciatus) 两个野生群体形态差异分析[J]. 海洋与湖沼, 2008, 39(6): 655-660. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0029-814X.2008.06.017
    [27]
    马爱军, 王新安, 雷霁霖, 等. 大菱鲆 (Scophthalmus maximus) 四个不同地理群体数量形态特征比较[J]. 海洋与湖沼, 2008, 39(1): 24-29. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0029-814X.2008.01.004
    [28]
    RICHARD H, EDITORS H C. Black bass biology and management[M]. Washington, D. C.: Sport Fishing Institute, 1975: 67-75.
    [29]
    BAI J, LUTZ-CARRILLO D J, QDUAN Y, et al. Taxonomic status and genetic diversity of cultured largemouth bass Micropterus salmoides in China[J]. Aquaculture, 2008, 278(1/2/3/4): 27-30.
    • Related Articles

  • Related Articles

    [1]LI Yu, HUANG Jiansheng, CHEN Youming, WEN Zhenwei, OU Guanghai, HUANG Jianpeng, JIANG Xintao, XIE Ruitao, MA Qian, CHEN Gang. Effect of low temperature stress on antioxidant stress, apoptosis and histological structure of gills in cobia (Rachycentron canadum)[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2023, 19(3): 68-77. DOI: 10.12131/20220227
    [2]CHEN Jie, HE Yang, DAI Xuping, WANG Jun, QING Chuanjie, LI Rui. Histological observation and innate immune barrier study of head kidney of Pelteobagrus vachelli[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2021, 17(1): 82-90. DOI: 10.12131/20200119
    [3]WANG Jian, ZENG Benhe, XU Zhaoli, ZHANG Bianbian, LIU Haiping, WANG Wanliang, WANG Jinlin, ZHOU Jianshe, HUANG Liping. Effect of dietary protein level on digestive enzyme activity and histological structure in intestine and liver of juvenile Schizopygopsis younghusbandi[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2019, 15(6): 112-119. DOI: 10.12131/20190107
    [4]MA Dingchang, YE Liuhe, XU Aiyu, PAN Gan, LONG Cheng. A histological study of Tylorrhynchus heterochaetus[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2014, 10(4): 58-63. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-0780.2014.04.010
    [5]LIU Zaijun, CEN Jianwei, LI Laihao, YANG Xianqing, HAO Shuxian, WEI Ya, ZHOU Wanjun. Thoughts and prospect of comprehensive utilization of tilapia blood[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2012, 8(2): 76-80. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-0780.2012.02.012
    [6]WANG Jingxiang, LI Jia′er, OU Youjun, WANG Yongcui. Ultrastructure of peripheral blood cells of highfin grouper Cromileptes altivelis[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2011, 7(5): 50-54. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-0780.2011.05.008
    [7]HU Lingling, LI Jia'er, OU Youjun, YU Na, WANG Gang. Study on microstructure of head-kidney and spleen of Oplegnathus fasciatus[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2010, 6(3): 41-45. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-2227.2010.03.008
    [8]LAO Haihua, YE Xing, ZOU Weimin, BAI Junjie, TAN Aiping. Detection of infectious spleen and kidney necrosis virus (ISKNV) of mandarin fish (Siniperca chuatsi) by nested PCR[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2009, 5(4): 69-72. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-2227.2009.04.013
    [9]SU Youlu, XU Liwen, FENG Juan, GUO Zhixun, WANG Jiangyong. Study on the morphology of peripheral blood cells of juvenile cobia Rachycentron canadum[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2007, 3(1): 48-53.
    [10]HUANG Jian-hua, MA Zhi-ming, ZHOU Fa-lin, YE Le, JIANG Shi-gui. Study on anatomy structure and histology of the ovary of wild Penaeus monodon(Fabricius) from the north of South China Sea[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2005, 1(3): 49-53.

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(2)

    1. 安余梁，祁峰，母锐敏，马桂霞. 微藻除磷机理及其工艺模式的研究进展. 工业水处理. 2025(02): 10-17 .
    2. 马林，李春艳，李明泽，罗鑫，丁子元，孟睦涵，徐林通，姜巨峰. 天津市碳汇渔业潜力研究及未来展望. 海洋湖沼通报(中英文). 2024(04): 81-88 .

    Other cited types(2)

Catalog

    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML
    Article views PDF downloads Cited by(4)
    Related

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co., Ltd.  

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return