LIU Zhiqiang, XU Liuxiong, TANG Hao, HU Fuxiang, ZHOU Cheng. Hydrodynamic performance and around flow field of biplane-type otter board with different working positions[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2020, 16(2): 87-98. DOI: 10.12131/20190221
Citation: LIU Zhiqiang, XU Liuxiong, TANG Hao, HU Fuxiang, ZHOU Cheng. Hydrodynamic performance and around flow field of biplane-type otter board with different working positions[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2020, 16(2): 87-98. DOI: 10.12131/20190221

Hydrodynamic performance and around flow field of biplane-type otter board with different working positions

More Information
  • Received Date: October 29, 2019
  • Revised Date: December 08, 2019
  • Accepted Date: February 14, 2020
  • Available Online: February 26, 2020
  • Otter board, an important accessory for net expansion in the single trawl, whose stability directly determines the degree of expansion of the trawl mouth and affects the catch efficiency and economic benefits. In this study, the hydrodynamic performance of the biplane-type was investigated by using the flume tank experiment and numerical simulation (Computational fluid dynamics, CFD) at different heel angles (inward, outward and tilt) and angles of attack, and the flow field and surface pressure around otter board was visualized. The results show: 1) At heel angle of 0° and angle of attack of 25°, both the lift coefficients of otter board for flume tank experiment and numerical simulation reached the maximum values (1.69 and 1.88, respectively), while both drag coefficients decreased with increasing heel angle. 2) Both the lift-to-drag ratios of model experiment and numerical simulation decreased with the increase of heel angle, and both reached the maximum values (3.27 and 3.69, respectively) when the heel inward angle was 5°. 3) The pressure center coefficient (Cpb) almost maintained stable with the change of heel angle; Cpc increased and decreased with increasing heel angle when the otter board was set to forward and backward tilting states, respectively. 4) CFD results show that the vortex at the rear of the center surface of otter board decreased with increasing heel angle. When the otter board was in inward and outward inclination states, the front end flow velocity reduction zone increased with increasing heel angle gradually. The pressure center moved toward the end chord of otter board as the heel angle increased in forward tilting state, but moved toward the lower end chord in backward tilting state. The results can provide scientific references for the studies on the stability of otter board and adjustion of fishing strategy.

  • [1]
    徐宝生, 张勋, 王明彦. 单船拖网网板的现状及发展趋势[J]. 福建水产, 2010(1): 86-90. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-5601.2010.01.022
    [2]
    郭根喜, 刘同渝, 黄小华, 等. 拖网网板动力学理论研究与实践[M]. 广州: 广东科技出版社, 2008: 34-40.
    [3]
    许柳雄. 渔具理论与设计学[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2004: 132-144.
    [4]
    张勋, 王明彦, 徐宝生. 拖网网板型式、结构与性能的研究与应用进展[J]. 中国水产科学, 2004, 11(z1): 107-113. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1005-8737.2004.z1.022
    [5]
    孙满昌. 海洋渔业技术学[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2014: 93-100.
    [6]
    MCHUGH M J, BROADHURST M K, STERLING D J, et al. Relative benthic disturbances of conventional and novel otter boards[J]. ICES J Mar Sci, 2015, 72(8): 2450-2456. doi: 10.1093/icesjms/fsv100
    [7]
    杨吝. 开缝圆型网板的水动力学特性[J]. 水产科技, 1996(2): 38-41.
    [8]
    杨吝. 双片圆型网板的水动力学特性[J]. 江西水产科技, 1996(5): 42-44.
    [9]
    SU X, LU H S, FENG B, et al. Hydrodynamic characteristics of the double-winged otter board in the deep waters of the Mauritanian Sea[J]. Chin J Oceanol Limnol, 2018, 36(4): 1417-1424. doi: 10.1007/s00343-018-7047-3
    [10]
    王明彦, 王锦浩, 张勋, 等. 立式V型曲面网板的水动力性能[J]. 水产学报, 2004, 28(3): 311-315.
    [11]
    FUKUDA K. Study on hydrodynamic characteristics of biplane type otter board [D]. Tokyo: Tokyo University of Marine Science and Technology, 1999: 1-120.
    [12]
    FUKUDA K, HU F X, TOKAI T, et al. Effects of aspect and camber ratios on hydrodynamic characteristics of biplane-type otter board[J]. Nippon Suisan Gakkaishi, 1999, 65: 860-865. doi: 10.2331/suisan.65.860
    [13]
    FUKUDA, K, MATUDA K, HU F X, et al. A model experiment on hydro-dynamic characteristics of biplane-type otter board[J]. Nippon Suisan Gakkaishi, 1997, 63: 207-212. doi: 10.2331/suisan.63.207
    [14]
    MCHUGH M J, BROADHURST M K, STERLING D J. Comparing three conventional penaeid-trawl otter boards and the new batwing design[J]. Fish Res, 2015, 167: 180-189. doi: 10.1016/j.fishres.2015.02.013
    [15]
    刘健, 黄洪亮, 陈帅, 等. 小展弦比立式曲面网板的水动力性能[J]. 水产学报, 2013, 37(11): 1742-1749.
    [16]
    SHEN X L, HU F X, KUMAZAWA T, et al. Hydrodynamic characteristics of a hyper-lift otter board with wing-end plates[J]. Fish Sci, 2015, 81(3): 433-442. doi: 10.1007/s12562-015-0873-8
    [17]
    刘圣聪, 刘佳茗. 矩形曲面网板水动力性能的数值模拟[J]. 安徽农学通报, 2017(18): 98-114.
    [18]
    XU Q C, HUANG L Y, ZHAO F F, et al. Effects of aspect ratio on the hydrodynamic performance of full-scale rectangular otter board: numerical simulation study[J]. Ocean Engin, 2017, 142: 338-347. doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2017.07.007
    [19]
    XU Q C, FENG C L, HUANG L Y, et al. Parameter optimization of a double-deflector rectangular cambered otter board: numerical simulation study[J]. Ocean Engin, 2018, 162: 108-116. doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2018.05.008
    [20]
    XU Q C, HUANG L Y, ZHAO F F, et al. Study on the hydrodynamic characteristics of the rectangular V-type otter board using computational fluid dynamics[J]. Fish Sci, 2017, 83(2): 181-190. doi: 10.1007/s12562-017-1065-5
    [21]
    TAKAHASHI Y, FUJIMORI Y, HU F X, et al. Design of trawl otter boards using computational fluid dynamics[J]. Fish Res, 2015, 161: 400-407. doi: 10.1016/j.fishres.2014.08.011
    [22]
    TAKAHASHI Y, FUJIMORI Y, HU F X, et al. Shape optimization for otter board using computational fluid dynamics analysis and response surface methodology[J]. Nippon Suisan Gakkaishi, 2017, 83(6): 950-960. doi: 10.2331/suisan.16-00076
    [23]
    凌桂龙. ANSYS Workbench 15.0从入门到精通[M]. 北京: 清华大学出版社, 2014: 20-60.
    [24]
    SHIH T H, LIOU W W, SHABBIR A, et al. A new k-ϵ eddy viscosity model for high reynolds number turbulent flows[J]. Comput Fluids, 1995, 24(3): 227-238. doi: 10.1016/0045-7930(94)00032-T
    [25]
    CHEN Y L, YAO Y M, ZHANG Z M, et al. Numerical analysis of a mid-water trawl system with a 6-DOF otter board model and sea-trial verification[J]. IEEE Access, 2018, 6: 68429-68439. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2879899
    [26]
    REITE K J, SORENSEN A J. Mathematical modeling of the hydrodynamic forces on a trawl door[J]. IEEE J Oceanic Engin, 2006, 31(2): 432-453. doi: 10.1109/JOE.2006.875098
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(4)

    1. 尹海晓, 王志康, 罗小勇, 王铭, 郭云, 李凯. 不同生长条件对藻源有机物化学特征的影响. 给水排水. 2019(02): 134-140 .
    2. 曾玲, 龙超, 文菁. 营养盐限制对利玛原甲藻生长和产毒的影响. 广东农业科学. 2018(02): 135-144 .
    3. 徐煜, 徐武杰, 文国樑, 胡晓娟, 苏浩昌, 杨铿, 李卓佳, 曹煜成. 颤藻浓度和水温对凡纳滨对虾响应颤藻粗提液毒性的影响. 南方水产科学. 2017(01): 26-32 . 本站查看
    4. 孙志伟, 邱丽华, 段舜山, 蔡卓平, 李卓佳, 文国樑. 化感作用抑制有害藻类生长的研究进展. 生态科学. 2015(06): 188-192 .

    Other cited types(1)

Catalog

    Article views PDF downloads Cited by(5)
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return