Volume 16 Issue 1
Feb.  2020
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Abstract
References
Related Articles
LIU Zuoyi, QI Shibin, HE Ning, KOU Jiefeng, SUN Kaifeng. Effects of nitrogen, phosphorus and carbon on growth of seven marine microalgae[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2020, 16(1): 87-97. DOI: 10.12131/20190089
Citation: LIU Zuoyi, QI Shibin, HE Ning, KOU Jiefeng, SUN Kaifeng. Effects of nitrogen, phosphorus and carbon on growth of seven marine microalgae[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2020, 16(1): 87-97. DOI: 10.12131/20190089
shu

Effects of nitrogen, phosphorus and carbon on growth of seven marine microalgae

  • 1.

    South China Institute of Environmental Sciences, Ministry of Ecology and Environment, Guangzhou 510535, China

  • 2.

    School of Life Science, Resources and Environment, Yichun University, Yichun 336000, China

More Information
  • Received Date: April 23, 2019
  • Revised Date: August 21, 2019
  • Available Online: October 08, 2019
    Graphical Abstract
    • Abstract
  • In order to screen fine algae species (strains) for in situ treatment of aquaculture tail water, we investigated the effects of nitrogen (nitrate, ammonium and urea), phosphorus (phosphate) and carbon (carbonate) on the growth of seven marine microalgae (Cochlodinium geminatum, Karenia mikimotoi, Skeletonema costatum, Chaetoceros muelleri, Phaeocystis globosa, Platymonas subcordiformis, Nannochloropsis oculata) in batch cultures. The results reaveal that the growth rates of microalgae were positively correlated with nutrients concentration. Compared with the control, the enhancements on the specific growth rate were 35%, 19% and 19% in C. geminatum, S. costatum and N. oculata under carbonate treatments. The enchancements on the specific growth rate under phosphate, nitrate, ammonium and urea were 25.01%−446.60%, 16.54%−77.52%, 15.79%−88.82% and 25.16%−71.43%, respectively. In general, the maximal specific growth rates (highest in P. globosa) of seven marine algae under carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus were negatively correlated with cell size, while those of P. subcordiformis and N. oculata were not significantly different with red tide microalgae except P. globosa. The nitrate and phosphate uptake rates were positively correlated with cell size, but the utilization efficiency of nitrogen/phosphorus per cell was negatively correlated with cell size. The N/P ratios in all culture medium increased. The phosphorus uptake rates were higher than nitrogen uptake rates. P. subcordiformis and N. oculata can be used in algal absorption of nitrogen and phosphorus in aquaculture tail water.
    • FullText(HTML)
    • References (34)
  • [1]
    张景平, 黄小平, 江志坚, 等. 珠江口海域污染的水质综合污染指数和生物多样性指数评价[J]. 热带海洋学报, 2010, 29(1): 69-76. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-5470.2010.01.011
    [2]
    SHI X Y, LI H M, WANG H. Nutrient structure of the Taiwan Warm Current and estimation of vertical nutrient fluxes in upwelling areas in the East China Sea in summer[J]. J Ocean Univ China, 2014, 13(4): 613-620. doi: 10.1007/s11802-014-2481-0
    [3]
    HUNG J J, HUANG W C, YU C S. Environmental and biogeochemical changes following a decade's reclamation in the Dapeng (Tapong) Bay, southwestern Taiwan[J]. Est Coast Shelf Sci, 2013, 130(SI): 9-20.
    [4]
    李仕平, 李仙, 张光磊, 等. 东寨港海水增养殖区水质状况及变化趋势研究[J]. 海南师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 30(4): 430-435.
    [5]
    HERATH S S, SATOH S. Environmental impact of phosphorus and nitrogen from aquaculture[M]. England: Woodhead Publishing, 2015: 369-386.
    [6]
    EDWARDS P. Aquaculture environment interactions: past, present and likely future trends[J]. Aquaculture, 2015, 447: 2-14. doi: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2015.02.001
    [7]
    蒋增杰, 方建光, 毛玉泽, 等. 海水鱼类网箱养殖水域沉积物有机质的来源甄别[J]. 中国水产科学, 2012, 19(2): 348-354.
    [8]
    韩芳, 霍元子, 杜霞, 等. 象山港网箱养殖对水域环境的影响[J]. 上海海洋大学学报, 2012, 21(5): 825-830.
    [9]
    陈一波, 宋国宝, 赵文星, 等. 中国海水养殖污染负荷估算[J]. 海洋环境科学, 2016, 35(1): 1-6, 12.
    [10]
    王申, 高珊珊, 蒋力, 等. 水产养殖系统氮磷营养盐收支及其生态影响研究[J]. 水产学杂志, 2018, 31(5): 50-57. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-3832.2018.05.011
    [11]
    李金亮, 陈雪芬, 赖秋明, 等. 凡纳滨对虾高位池养殖氮、磷收支研究及养殖效果分析[J]. 南方水产, 2010, 6(5): 13-20. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-2227.2010.05.003
    [12]
    刘永士, 臧维玲, 侯文杰, 等. 凡纳滨对虾生长及养殖池氮、磷收支随养殖时间的变化[J]. 大连海洋大学学报, 2013, 28(2): 143-147. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-1388.2013.02.006
    [13]
    夏丽华, 徐珊, 陈智斌, 等. 广东省海岸带海水养殖业污染贡献率研究[J]. 广州大学学报(自然科学版), 2013, 12(5): 80-86.
    [14]
    XIE B, YU K J. Shrimp farming in China: operating characteristics, environmental impact and perspectives[J]. Ocean Coast Manage, 2007, 50(7): 538-550. doi: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2007.02.006
    [15]
    朱蓉, 张洪海, 张婧, 等. 不同氮磷比和铁浓度对两种海洋微藻生产二甲基硫和二甲巯基丙酸内盐的实验研究[J]. 中国海洋大学学报 (自然科学版), 2018, 48(12): 62-70.
    [16]
    唐启升, 丁晓明, 刘世禄, 等. 我国水产养殖业绿色、可持续发展保障措施与政策建议[J]. 中国渔业经济, 2014, 32(2): 5-11. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-590X.2014.02.001
    [17]
    MARTINEZ-CORDOVA L R, LÓPEZ-ELÍAS J A, LEYVA-MIRANDA G, et al. Bioremediation and reuse of shrimp aquaculture effluents to farm whiteleg shrimp, Litopenaeus vannamei: a first approach[J]. Aquacult Res, 2011, 42(10): 1415-1423. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2109.2010.02730.x
    [18]
    AL-HAFEDH Y S, ALAM A, BUSCHMANN A H. Experiments on an integrated aquaculture system (seaweeds and marine fish) on the Red Sea coast of Saudi Arabia: efficiency comparison of two local seaweed species for nutrient biofiltration and production[J]. Rev Aquacult, 2012, 4(1): 21-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-5131.2012.01057.x
    [19]
    刘梅, 原居林, 何海生, 等. 微藻在南美白对虾养殖废水中的生长及净化效果[J]. 应用与环境生物学报, 2018, 249(4): 866-872.
    [20]
    田立丹, 王素英. 常见废水与螺旋藻生长的适配性研究[J]. 水产科学, 2011, 30(6): 325-330. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-1111.2011.06.004
    [21]
    GUILLARD R R L. Culture of phytoplankton for feeding marine invertebrates[M]//SMITH W L, CHANLEY M H. Culture of marine invertebrate animals. New York: Plenum Press, 1975: 26-60.
    [22]
    GUILLARD R L, RYTHER J H. Studies of marine planktonic diatoms. I. Cyclotella nana Hustedt and Detonula confervacea (Cleve) Gran[J]. Can J Microbiol, 1962, 8: 229-239. doi: 10.1139/m62-029
    [23]
    梁英, 李泽邦, 刘春强, 等. 不同磷源对3种海洋微藻生长和种间竞争的影响[J]. 海洋湖沼通报, 2017(5): 132-140.
    [24]
    俞群娣, 王亚军, 余新威, 等. 微小亚历山大藻(Alexandrium minutum)的氮磷吸收, 生长, 产毒动态变化[J]. 海洋与湖沼, 2018, 49(2): 346-351.
    [25]
    韦桂秋, 王华, 蔡伟叙, 等. 近10年珠江口海域赤潮发生特征及原因初探[J]. 海洋通报, 2012, 31(4): 466-474.
    [26]
    王朝晖, 林朗聪, 康伟, 等. 有毒有害赤潮藻类旋沟藻(Cochlodinium schütt)研究进展[J]. 暨南大学学报(自然科学与医学版), 2011, 32(1): 109-114. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-9965.2011.01.023
    [27]
    WANG B, XIN M, WEI Q, et al. A historical overview of coastal eutrophication in the China Seas[J]. Mar Pollut Bull, 2018, 136: 394-400. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2018.09.044
    [28]
    RAVEN J A, GIORDANO M, BEARDALL J. Insights into the evolution of CCMs from comparisons with other resource acquisition and assimilation processes[J]. Physiol Plantarum, 2008, 133(1): 4-14. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3054.2007.01024.x
    [29]
    BENSCHOP J J, BADGER M R, PRICE G D. Characterisation of CO2 and HCO3 − uptake in the cyanobacterium Synechocystis sp. PCC6803[J]. Photosynth Res, 2003, 77(2/3): 117-126. doi: 10.1023/A:1025850230977
    [30]
    FU M Z, WANG Z L, LI Y, et al. Phytoplankton biomass size structure and its regulation in the Southern Yellow Sea (China): seasonal variability[J]. Cont Shelf Res, 2016, 29(18): 2178-2194.
    [31]
    赵艳芳, 俞志明, 宋秀贤, 等. 不同磷源形态对中肋骨条藻和东海原甲藻生长及磷酸酶活性的影响[J]. 环境科学, 2009, 30(3): 693-699. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0250-3301.2009.03.012
    [32]
    YAMAGUCHI H, SAKAMOTO S, YAMAGUCHI M. Nutrition and growth kinetics in nitrogen-and phosphorus-limited cultures of the novel red tide flagellate Chattonella ovata (Raphidophyceae)[J]. Harmful Algae, 2008, 7(1): 26-32. doi: 10.1016/j.hal.2007.05.011
    [33]
    王小冬, 王艳. 赤潮异弯藻和海洋卡盾藻抗氧化酶活性对氮磷比失衡的响应[J]. 海洋环境科学, 2012, 31(3): 337-340. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-6336.2012.03.007
    [34]
    康燕玉, 梁君荣, 高亚辉, 等. 氮、磷比对两种赤潮藻生长特性的影响及藻间竞争作用[J]. 海洋学报(中文版), 2006, 28(5): 117-122. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0253-4193.2006.05.015
    • Related Articles

  • Related Articles

    [1]ZHU Shuli, CHEN Weitao, WU Zhi, XIA Yuguo, YANG Jiping, LI Yuefei, LI Jie. Preliminary investigation of fish diversity in middle and lower reaches of Pearl River based on environmental DNA technology[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2024, 20(1): 120-129. DOI: 10.12131/20230111
    [2]XIE Yufang, WU Peng, LIU Yong, XIAO Yayuan, TANG Guanglong, WANG Teng, LIN Lin, LI Chunhou. Study on habitat suitability of Coilia mystus in Pearl River Estuary, China[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2023, 19(1): 22-29. DOI: 10.12131/20220029
    [3]LI Hongting, ZHANG Shuai, ZOU Keshu, CHEN Zuozhi, CHEN Xiaolei, JIANG Peiwen, CAO Yiting, LI Min. Establishment and optimization of environmental DNA extraction method from water of Pearl River Estuary[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2022, 18(3): 30-37. DOI: 10.12131/20210304
    [4]CHEN Zhi, CAI Xingwei, ZHANG Qingfeng, LI Gaojun, MA Chunlai, SHEN Zhixin. Preliminary construction and comparative analysis of environmental DNA metabarcoding reference database of freshwater fishes in Hainan Island[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2022, 18(3): 1-12. DOI: 10.12131/20210339
    [5]XIONG Pengli, CHEN Zuozhi, HOU Gang, ZHANG Shuai, QIU Yongsong, FAN Jiangtao, XU Shannan. Decadal change in biological traits of Collichthys lucidus in Pearl River Estuary[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2021, 17(6): 31-38. DOI: 10.12131/20210072
    [6]YAN Yali, ZHANG Nan, GUO Huayang, GUO Liang, ZHU Kecheng, LIU Baosuo, ZHANG Dianchang. Species identification and phylogenetic relationship in Siganidae based on DNA barcoding[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2019, 15(1): 100-105. DOI: 10.12131/20180083
    [7]SHUAI Fangmin, LI Zhiquan, LIU Guowen, LI Xinhui, LI Yuefei, YANG Jiping, LI Jie. Resource status of Japanese eel (Anguilla japonica) in the Pearl River Estuary[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2015, 11(2): 85-89. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-0780.2015.02.012
    [8]GAO Yuan, LAI Zini, WANG Chao, PANG Shixun, WEI Taili, XIE Wenping, YANG Wanling. Community characteristics of zooplankton in Pearl River Estuary in summer of 2006[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2008, 4(1): 10-15.
    [9]WANG Di, LIN Zhaojin. Spatial and temporal variations of fish community structure in the Pearl River Estuary waters[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2006, 2(4): 37-45.
    [10]YANG Lin, ZHANG Xufeng, ZHANG Peng, TAN Yongguang. Composition of by-catch of shrimping beam trawl in the Pearl River Estuary, China[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2005, 1(1): 27-34.

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(11)

    1. 郭瑶杰，万武波，王海山，叶乐，陈治. 3组常用鱼类eDNA宏条形码通用引物对三亚水环境样品的物种检出效果比较. 南方水产科学. 2025(01): 66-76 . 本站查看
    2. 薛向平，孙朝徽，刘霞，惠筠，李学军，李秀启，司飞. 基于COI基因的黄河河南-山东段鲤群体遗传结构分析. 淡水渔业. 2025(02): 43-52 .
    3. 朱书礼，陈蔚涛，武智，夏雨果，杨计平，李跃飞，李捷. 基于环境DNA技术的珠江中下游鱼类多样性初步研究. 南方水产科学. 2024(01): 120-129 . 本站查看
    4. 于耀鲜，邢冉冉，邓婷婷，王琳，卢思远，王宏勋，王丽梅，陈颖. 基于重组酶介导等温扩增-CRISPR/Cas12a的青鱼物种快速鉴定研究. 食品安全质量检测学报. 2024(04): 40-48 .
    5. 徐颖琪，梁绪虹，陈新军，宋成辉，彭祖焜，王丛丛. 基于COⅠ基因构建西北太平洋常见鱼类DNA条形码参考数据库. 上海海洋大学学报. 2024(04): 823-835 .
    6. 张浩博，王晓艳，陈治，钟兰萍，高天翔. 基于环境DNA metabarcoding的舟山及其邻近海域鱼类空间分布格局的初步研究. 水产学报. 2024(08): 125-138 .
    7. 李筱芹，吴开阳，倪达富，杨丽亚，鲁桃秀，张连博，邓华堂，吴彤飞，何荣超，付梅，姚维志，吕红健. 基于环境DNA技术的梯级水坝对长江上游重要支流鱼类多样性的影响研究——以綦江为例. 生态学报. 2024(19): 8865-8883 .
    8. 陈炳耀，信誉，路方婷，孙婧，刘杉，李敏，吴斌，王崇瑞，张衡，周玉香，白玲. 长江江豚监测现状及展望. 中国环境监测. 2023(02): 1-10 .
    9. 陈治，蔡杏伟，申志新，张清凤，李芳远，谷圆，李高俊，赵光军，王镇江. 海南岛淡水鱼类eDNA宏条形码COⅠ通用引物的筛选. 渔业科学进展. 2023(06): 40-57 .
    10. 刘乙蒙，刘洋，刘必林，俞晔伟，宋成辉，王丛丛. Cyt b和12S rRNA基因条形码在灯笼鱼科鱼类物种鉴定中的应用. 中国水产科学. 2023(09): 1112-1126 .
    11. 蒋佩文，李敏，张帅，陈作志，徐姗楠. 基于环境DNA宏条码和底拖网的珠江河口鱼类多样性. 水生生物学报. 2022(11): 1701-1711 .

    Other cited types(5)

Catalog

    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML
    Article views (6202) PDF downloads (102) Cited by(16)
    Related

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co., Ltd.  

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return