Volume 16 Issue 1
Feb.  2020
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Abstract
References
Related Articles
LIAO Xiuli, HUANG Honghui, QI Zhanhui, DAI Ming, LIU Huaxue. Comprehensive rating quantitative assessment on aquaculture environment of subtropical bay in northern South Sea China[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2020, 16(1): 98-109. DOI: 10.12131/20190067
Citation: LIAO Xiuli, HUANG Honghui, QI Zhanhui, DAI Ming, LIU Huaxue. Comprehensive rating quantitative assessment on aquaculture environment of subtropical bay in northern South Sea China[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2020, 16(1): 98-109. DOI: 10.12131/20190067
shu

Comprehensive rating quantitative assessment on aquaculture environment of subtropical bay in northern South Sea China

  • South China Sea Fisheries Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences/Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Fishery Ecology and Environment/Key Laboratory of Open-Sea Fishery Development, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Guangzhou 510300, China

More Information
  • Received Date: March 20, 2019
  • Revised Date: October 07, 2019
  • Available Online: October 28, 2019
    Graphical Abstract
    • Abstract
  • According to the ecological environment survey data of three subtropical aquaculture bays (Maowei Sea, Dapeng Cove and Baisha Bay) along the northern coast of the South China Sea from 2011 to 2012, and by appling methods of comprehensive grading evaluation of aquaculture area as well as river comprehensive water quality index (Iwq) evaluation, we compared the advantages and disadvantages of ecological environment of the same level quantitatively based on classification of marine environment. The results show that only two of the 12 voyages in the three bays (autumn and winter in Dapeng Cove) had a good environmental rating, and the other 10 were medium. In spring, the rating of the three bays was medium and with simila index. In summer, autumn and winter, the environmental quality of Baisha Bay was the worst. In the past two years, five water environmental factors had been alarmed, and the three bays were at risk of eutrophication. The influence of seasonal change on the bay environment increased with the increase of latitude. It is found that the improved Iwq index is more efficient in comparing the environmental conditions of the same level, but its comparability among different levels is uncertain.
    • FullText(HTML)
    • References (40)
  • [1]
    杨宇峰, 姜胜, 王朝晖, 等. 中国海水养殖发展状况与养殖海域赤潮生态防治[J]. 海洋科学, 2004, 28(7): 71-75. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3096.2004.07.016
    [2]
    张雅芝. 我国海水鱼类网箱养殖现状及其发展前景[J]. 海洋科学, 1995(5): 21-24.
    [3]
    KARAKASSIS I, TSAPAKIS M, HATZIYANNI E, et al. Impact of cage farming of fish on the seabed in three Mediterranean coastal areas[J]. ICES J Mar Sci, 2000, 57(5): 1462-1471. doi: 10.1006/jmsc.2000.0925
    [4]
    董双林, 潘克厚, BROCKMANN U. 海水养殖对沿岸生态环境影响的研究进展[J]. 青岛海洋大学学报, 2000, 30(4): 575-582.
    [5]
    周毅, 杨红生, 张福绥. 海水双壳贝类的生物沉积及其生态效应[J]. 海洋科学, 2003, 27(2): 23-26. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3096.2003.02.008
    [6]
    BRICKER S B, CLEMENT C G, PIRHALLA D E, et al. National estuarine eutrophication assessment: effects of nutrient enrichment in the nation's estuaries[J]. IEEE T Energy Conver, 1999, 10(2): 261-267.
    [7]
    FERREIRA J G, BRICKER S B, SIMAS T C. Application and sensitivity testing of a eutrophication assessment method on coastal systems in the United States and European Union[J]. J Environ Manag, 2007, 82(4): 433-445. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2006.01.003
    [8]
    BORJA A, BRICKER S B, DAUER D M, et al. Overview of integrative tools and methods in assessing ecological integrity in estuarine and coastal systems worldwide[J]. Mar Pollut Bull, 2008, 56(9): 1519-1537. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2008.07.005
    [9]
    OSPAR. Draft Common Assessment Criteria and their application within the comprehensive procedure of the common procedure[C]//Proceeding of the Meeting of the Eutrophication Task Group (ETG). London, 9–11 October 2001. London: OSPAR Convention for the Protection of the Marine Environment of the Northeast Atlantic, 2001.
    [10]
    罗先香, 朱永贵, 张龙军, 等. 集约用海对海洋生态环境影响的评价方法[J]. 生态学报, 2014, 34(1): 182-189.
    [11]
    蒲新明, 傅明珠, 王宗灵, 等. 海水养殖生态系统健康综合评价: 方法与模式[J]. 生态学报, 2012, 32(19): 6210-6222.
    [12]
    谢玲, 李海燕, 徐华兵, 等. 深澳湾海水养殖生态系统健康评价[J]. 生态学杂志, 2014, 33(5): 1233-1242.
    [13]
    崔力拓. 河北省海域贝类养殖区生态环境质量评价研究[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2011, 39(10): 6004-6006. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0517-6611.2011.10.127
    [14]
    钟硕良, 阮金山, 吴立峰, 等. 厦门海域贝类养殖生态环境质量评价和类别划分研究[J]. 海洋水产研究, 2008, 29(6): 15-26.
    [15]
    吴海燕.近岸海域生态质量状况综合评价方法及应用研究[D].南京: 南京大学, 2012: Ⅰ-Ⅱ.
    [16]
    LIAO X L, HUANG H H, DAI M, et al. The synthetic evaluation and early warning of aquaculture area in Dapeng Cove of Daya Bay, South China Sea[C]//The 5th International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedical Engineering (iCBBE 2011) Proceedings-Volume 3, Wuhan, China, 2011: 2430-2434.
    [17]
    徐祖信. 我国河流单因子水质标识指数评价方法研究[J]. 同济大学学报(自然科学版), 2005, 33(3): 321-325. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0253-374X.2005.03.008
    [18]
    徐祖信. 我国河流综合水质标识指数评价方法研究[J]. 同济大学学报(自然科学版), 2005, 33(4): 482-488. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0253-374X.2005.04.012
    [19]
    LIU X B, LI G F, LIU Z G, et al. Water pollution characteristics and assessment of lower reaches in Haihe River Basin[J]. Procedia Environ Sci, 2010(2): 199-206.
    [20]
    中国海湾志编纂委员会. 中国海湾志: 第十二分册(广西海湾) [M]. 北京: 海洋出版社, 1993: 144-213.
    [21]
    蓝文陆, 王晓辉, 黎明民. 应用光合色素研究广西钦州湾丰水期浮游植物群落结构[J]. 生态学报, 2011, 31(13): 3601-3608.
    [22]
    韦蔓新, 赖廷和, 何本茂. 钦州湾近20a来水环境指标的变化趋势Ⅰ平水期营养盐状况[J]. 海洋环境科学, 2002, 21(3): 49-52. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-6336.2002.03.011
    [23]
    韦蔓新, 赖廷和, 何本茂. 钦州湾丰, 枯水期营养状况变化趋势及其影响因素[J]. 热带海洋学报, 2003, 22(3): 16-21. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-5470.2003.03.003
    [24]
    韦蔓新, 童万平, 赖廷和, 等. 钦州湾内湾贝类养殖海区水环境特征及营养状况初探[J]. 黄渤海海洋, 2001, 19(4): 51-55.
    [25]
    彭鹏飞, 胡超群, 于宗赫, 等. 大鹏澳海水鱼类网箱养殖区水环境的时空变化及营养状态分析[J]. 热带海洋学报, 2012, 31(2): 110-117. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-5470.2012.02.015
    [26]
    于宗赫, 江涛, 夏建军, 等. 大鹏澳牡蛎养殖区生态服务价值评估[J]. 水产学报, 2014, 38(6): 853-860.
    [27]
    沈国英, 黄凌风, 郭丰, 等. 海洋生态学[M]. 3版. 北京: 科学出版社, 2010: 303.
    [28]
    徐恭昭. 大亚湾环境与资源[M]. 合肥: 安徽科学技术出版社, 1989: 8.
    [29]
    郑兵. 深澳湾环境因子的变化特征与龙须菜养殖的生态效应[D]. 汕头: 汕头大学, 2009: 7-8.
    [30]
    曹会彬. 深澳湾养殖环境调查与贝藻养殖容量研究[D]. 汕头: 汕头大学, 2011: I.
    [31]
    崔毅, 陈碧鹃, 马绍赛. 乳山湾浮游植物与环境因子的相关关系研究[J]. 应用生态学报, 2000, 11(6): 935-938. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-9332.2000.06.030
    [32]
    王兆礼, 朱长波, 张汉华, 等. 深澳湾网箱养殖对周边水环境和牡蛎生长的影响[J]. 广东农业科学, 2013(10): 134-137. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-874X.2013.10.040
    [33]
    吴日升, 李立. 南海上升流研究概述[J]. 台湾海峡, 2003, 22(2): 269-277.
    [34]
    杜虹, 郑兵, 陈伟洲, 等. 深澳湾海水养殖区水化因子的动态变化与水质量评价[J]. 海洋与湖沼, 2010, 41(6): 816-823. doi: 10.11693/hyhz201006003003
    [35]
    李占东, 林钦, 黄洪辉, 等. 大鹏澳网箱养殖海域水质评价及因子分析[J]. 海洋水产研究, 2005, 26(3): 35-40.
    [36]
    徐永健, 钱鲁闽. 水动力条件对龙须菜N吸收的影响[J]. 海洋环境科学, 2004, 23(2): 32-35. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-6336.2004.02.009
    [37]
    王首吉, 杜虹, 梅志平, 等. 春季深澳湾龙须菜固碳量及其影响因素[J]. 海洋环境科学, 2016, 35(3): 343-348.
    [38]
    张安弘. 广东深澳湾养殖区颗粒有机物和沉降颗粒物分布特征研究[D]. 广州: 暨南大学, 2016: 5.
    [39]
    YOKOYAMA H. Environmental quality criteria for fish farms in Japan[J]. Aquaculture, 2003, 226(1/2/3/4): 45-56.
    [40]
    黄洪辉. 海湾网箱养鱼生态环境影响与养殖容量研究[D]. 北京: 中国科学院研究生院, 2005: 106.
    • Related Articles

  • Related Articles

    [1]JIANG Yongsheng, ZHOU Shanshan, ZHOU Yongdong, XU Kaida, ZHEN Xiaoman, JIAO Lishi, ZHANG Qiuhong, QU Yao. Effects of water temperature in transportation on mortality and physiological indicators of Sepiella japonica[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2024, 20(4): 107-115. DOI: 10.12131/20240089
    [2]LI Haohua, LIAO Tao, BAI Chan, QIU Liang, ZU Xiaoyan, LI Hailan, CHEN Liping, XIONG Guangquan, WANG Juguang. Effects of pre-transport density and temperature domestication on simulated transport of juvenile Ictalurus punctatus[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2024, 20(2): 160-171. DOI: 10.12131/20230154
    [3]WANG Chaoqi, XU Bingjie, WU Tao, YANG Ling, LIU Yiming, PAN Ying. Comparative study on breeding density of Lutraria sieboldii in nursery culture and adult culture in Beibu Gulf beaches of Guangxi Province, China[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2023, 19(4): 105-115. DOI: 10.12131/20230046
    [4]CHEN Xu, ZHAO Wang, CHEN Mingqiang, TAN Chunming, YU Gang. Effects of salinity stress on oxygen consumption rate, ammonia excretion rate and immune-related enzyme activities of Strombus luhuanus[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2022, 18(5): 160-165. DOI: 10.12131/20210346
    [5]CHEN Xiaojiang, XIONG Liling, WU Jiangu, QI Lu, WANG Quan. Effects of anesthetic MS-222 and eugenol on oxygen consumption rate and ammonia excretion rate of Sinogastromyzon szechuanensis[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2020, 16(4): 69-74. DOI: 10.12131/20190261
    [6]CAO Xiaocong, HUANG Xiaolin, SUN Xinyi, LIN Heizhao, SHU Hu, YANG Yukai, HUANG Zhong. Anaesthesia effects of eugenol on juvenile Siganus oramin[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2019, 15(3): 50-56. DOI: 10.12131/20180232
    [7]LI Dandan, CHEN Pimao, ZHU Aiyi, YUAN Huarong, CHEN Wenjing, LONG Xinling, WANG Wenjie. Recovery level of metabolic enzymes in juvenile black sea bream (Sparus macrocephlus) after exhaustive exercise[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2018, 14(6): 59-65. DOI: 10.12131/20180064
    [8]LI Dandan, CHEN Pimao, ZHU Aiyi, YUAN Huarong, FENG Xue, WANG Wenjie, CHEN Wenjing, LONG Xinling. Effect of transport density on survival rate of black seabream sealed in oxygenated plastic bag during stock enhancement[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2018, 14(5): 36-44. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-0780.2018.05.005
    [9]YANG Qibin, YE Le, WEN Weigeng, WANG Yu, JIANG Shigui. Effect of salinity on molting, survival, growth and feed conversion rate of juvenile Penaeus monodon[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2008, 4(1): 16-21.
    [10]TANG Xianming, SUI Zhao, TIAN Jingbo, WANG Guofu. Effects of salinity on metabolic rate of juvenile turbot (Scophamus maximus)[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2006, 2(4): 54-58.

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(11)

    1. 王大伟，邢盈，蒋成宇，胡淼，赵金良. 放养密度对鳜幼鱼HPI轴激素、应激酶活力及呼吸频率的影响. 淡水渔业. 2025(02): 26-32 .
    2. 何静怡，魏涯，岑剑伟，郝淑贤，陈胜军，黄卉，赵永强，王悦齐，杨少玲，林织. 基于梯度降温的草鱼暂养及有水保活运输技术. 食品科学. 2024(04): 271-278 .
    3. 何静怡，郑伟，黄卉，岑剑伟，赵永强，王田，魏涯，郝淑贤，杨少玲，陈琛. 不同温度、盐度条件对草鱼暂养及应激保活的影响. 大连海洋大学学报. 2024(04): 597-605 .
    4. 梁雪莹，郑晓婷，陈秋羽，谢静怡，董宏标，李勇，杨金龙，陈成勋，张家松. 模拟运输胁迫对牛蛙幼蛙生理机能的影响. 广东海洋大学学报. 2024(06): 118-126 .
    5. 刘浩，李洁，李亚军，康鹏天，张国维，邵东宏，王建福. 水体中泥沙含量对虹鳟生存、生理和体表微生物的影响. 中国水产科学. 2024(11): 1365-1374 .
    6. 唐忠林，张佳佳，周国勤，陈树桥，徐钢春，徐跑，强俊，王佩佩. 丁香酚对“优鲈3号”幼鱼运输水质及其血液、肌肉生理指标的影响. 水产科技情报. 2023(01): 44-52 .
    7. 王文雯，杨静茹，付正祎，于刚，马振华. 运输时间对高体鰤幼鱼应激、代谢、抗氧化和免疫的影响. 中国渔业质量与标准. 2023(02): 25-36 .
    8. 李哲，周珊珊，王好学，王嘉浩，陈璐，徐开达. 运输振荡对条石鲷幼鱼生理应激和水体总氨氮含量的影响. 水产科技情报. 2023(05): 327-332 .
    9. 范宏博，胡丁月，徐莉，孙浩，刘峰，刘春娥，张小栓. 运输密度和时间对单环刺螠保活运输品质的影响. 农业工程. 2023(10): 72-77 .
    10. 虞为，陈雪晴，杨育凯，张燕娃，黄小林，黄忠，李涛，马振华，吴洽儿，于刚，周传朋，林黑着. 饲料中添加雨生红球藻对尖吻鲈生长性能、抗氧化能力及免疫状态的影响. 南方水产科学. 2022(05): 46-54 . 本站查看
    11. 陈旭，赵旺，陈明强，谭春明，于刚. 盐度胁迫对红娇凤凰螺耗氧率、排氨率以及免疫相关酶活性的影响. 南方水产科学. 2022(05): 160-165 . 本站查看

    Other cited types(4)

Catalog

    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML
    Article views (4934) PDF downloads (39) Cited by(15)
    Related

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co., Ltd.  

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return