Volume 15 Issue 5
Oct.  2019
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Abstract
References
Related Articles
LI Xin, LAI Zini, YANG Wanling, WANG Chao. Water quality evaluation of Pearl River Delta based on environmental factors and phytoplankton[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2019, 15(5): 25-34. DOI: 10.12131/20190020
Citation: LI Xin, LAI Zini, YANG Wanling, WANG Chao. Water quality evaluation of Pearl River Delta based on environmental factors and phytoplankton[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2019, 15(5): 25-34. DOI: 10.12131/20190020
shu

Water quality evaluation of Pearl River Delta based on environmental factors and phytoplankton

  • 1.

    Pearl River Fisheries Research Institute, Chines Academy of Fishery Science, Guangzhou 510380, China

  • 2.

    College of Fisheries and Life, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai 201306, China

More Information
  • Received Date: January 15, 2019
  • Revised Date: May 03, 2019
  • Accepted Date: May 27, 2019
  • Available Online: June 04, 2019
    Graphical Abstract
    • Abstract

  • In order to select asuitable method for water quality evaluation in the Pearl River Delta (PRD), we accessed and analyzed the water environment factors and phytoplankton data in PRD in 2015. Four phytoplankton indices, including Shannon index, evenness index, richness index and biomass index, were selected from six common phytoplankton indices based on similarities by using self-organizing map (SOM). Then, we compared the water quality evaluation results of the above indices and environmental factors. The results based on dissolved oxygen and ammonia nitrogen could reflect the spatial differences between city centers and other regions, but total nitrogen and total phosphorus were not suitable for water quality evaluation. However, the results based on Shannon and biomass indices could reflect the differences between city centers and other regions, but evenness and richness indices were not suitable for water quality evaluation. Except for total nitrogen and total phosphorus, the evaluation results of other environmental factors and four phytoplankton indices show that the water quality of the survey area was generally good, but the water quality of stations around the city was slightly poor. Thus, issolved oxygen, ammonia nitrogen, Shannon index and biomass index are suitable environmental factors and phytoplankton index for water quality evaluation.

    • FullText(HTML)
    • References (49)
  • [1]
    陈坚雄. 珠江三角洲水文监测站网优化与系统整体规划研究[D]. 武汉: 武汉大学, 2004: 24-25.
    [2]
    WANG C, LI X, WANG X, et al. Spatio-temporal patterns and predictions of phytoplankton assemblages in a subtropical river delta system[J]. Fund Appl Limnol, 2016, 187(4): 335-349. doi: 10.1127/fal/2016/0866
    [3]
    杨婉玲, 赖子尼, 曾艳艺, 等. 珠江中下游表层水体CODMn时空分布特征及水环境评价[J]. 生态环境学报, 2017, 26(4): 643-648.
    [4]
    杨婉玲, 赖子尼, 曾艳艺, 等. 珠三角河网水、沉积物中As含量分布特征及污染评价[J]. 生态环境学报, 2015(5): 831-837.
    [5]
    王帅, 赖子尼, 杨婉玲, 等. 珠江河口表层沉积物有机氮和总氮的分布[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2009, 35(19): 9081-9083. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0517-6611.2009.19.112
    [6]
    邴欣欣, 赖子尼, 高原, 等. 珠三角河网初级生产力时空差异及其影响因素[J]. 南方水产科学, 2017, 13(2): 1-8. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-0780.2017.02.001
    [7]
    詹玉涛, 范正华. 釜溪河浮游植物分布及其与水质污染的相关性研究[J]. 中国环境科学, 1991, 112(1): 29-33.
    [8]
    郭沛通, 林育真. 东平湖浮游植物与水质评价[J]. 海洋湖沼通报, 1997(4): 37-42.
    [9]
    彭凯, 李太民, 刘利, 等. 苏北骆马湖浮游植物群落结构及其水质生物评价[J]. 湖泊科学, 2018, 30(1): 183-191.
    [10]
    LEPISTO L, HOLOPAINEN L L, VUORISTO H. Type-specific and indicator taxa of phytoplankton as a quality criterion for assessing the ecological status of Finnish boreal lakes[J]. Limnologica, 2004, 34(3): 236-248. doi: 10.1016/S0075-9511(04)80048-3
    [11]
    LIU C, LIU L, SHEN H. Seasonal variations of phytoplankton community structure in relation to physico-chemical factors in Lake Baiyangdian, China[J]. Procedia Environ Sci, 2010, 2: 1622-1631. doi: 10.1016/j.proenv.2010.10.173
    [12]
    胡芳, 许振成, 姚玲爱, 等. 剑潭水库浮游植物群落特征与水环境因子关系研究[J]. 环境科学学报, 2014, 34(4): 950-958.
    [13]
    Van DAM H, MERTENS A, SINKELDAM J. A coded checklist and ecological indicator values of freshwater diatoms from the Netherlands[J]. Neth J Aquat Ecol, 1994, 28(1): 117-133. doi: 10.1007/BF02334251
    [14]
    王超, 赖子尼, 李新辉, 等. 西江下游浮游植物群落周年变化模式[J]. 生态学报, 2013, 33(14): 4398-4408.
    [15]
    KOLKWITZ R, MARSSON M. Ökologie der tierischen Saprobien.Beiträge zur Lehre von der biologischen Gewässerbeurteilung[J]. Int Rev Gesamten Hydrobiol Hydrogr, 1909, 2: 126-152. doi: 10.1002/(ISSN)1522-2632
    [16]
    SHANNON C E, WEAVER W. The mathematical theory of communication[M]. Illinois: University of Illinoi Press, 1949: 1-117.
    [17]
    PIELOU E C. Shannon's formula as a measure of specific diversity: its use and misuse[J]. Am Nat, 1966, 100(914): 463-465. doi: 10.1086/282439
    [18]
    赵秀侠, 方婷, 杨坤, 等. 安徽沱湖夏季浮游植物群落结构特征与环境因子关系[J]. 植物科学学报, 2018, 36(5): 687-695.
    [19]
    金香琴, 胡国宏. 吉林省兴隆水库浮游植物群落结构特征及其与环境因子的关系[J]. 东北师大学报(自然科学版), 2018, 50(3).
    [20]
    WU J T. A generic index of diatom assemblages as bioindicator of pollution in the Keelung River of Taiwan[J]. Hydrobiologie, 1999, 397: 79-87. doi: 10.1023/A:1003694414751
    [21]
    程军明, 张曼, 王良炎, 等. 三种浮游植物指示法在景观性河流水体营养状态评价中的应用[J]. 生态科学, 2015, 34(3): 37-43. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-6361.2015.03.007
    [22]
    朱为菊, 庞婉婷, 尤庆敏, 等. 淮河流域春季浮游植物群落结构特征及其水质评价[J]. 湖泊科学, 2017, 29(3): 637-645.
    [23]
    邓培雁, 雷远达, 刘威, 等. 七项河流附着硅藻指数在东江的适用性评估[J]. 生态学报, 2012, 32(16): 5014-5024.
    [24]
    薛浩, 郑丙辉, 孟凡生, 等. 基于着生硅藻指数的梧桐河水生态健康评价[J]. 生态毒理学报, 2018, 13(4): 83-90.
    [25]
    林青, 由文辉, 徐凤洁, 等. 滴水湖浮游动物群落结构及其与环境因子的关系[J]. 生态学报, 2014, 34(23): 6918-6929.
    [26]
    郭春燕, 冯佳, 谢树莲. 山西晋阳湖浮游藻类分布的时空格局及水质分析[J]. 湖泊科学, 2010, 22(2): 251-255.
    [27]
    粟丽, 黄梓荣, 陈作志. 水东湾春、秋季浮游植物群落结构特征[J]. 南方水产科学, 2015, 11(4): 27-33. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-0780.2015.04.004
    [28]
    MAGURRAN, ANNE E. Ecological diversity and its measurement[M]. New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1988: 23-25.
    [29]
    况琪军, 马沛明, 胡征宇, 等. 湖泊富营养化的藻类生物学评价与治理研究进展[J]. 安全与环境学报, 2005, 5(2): 87-91. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-6094.2005.02.024
    [30]
    KATSIAPI M, MOUSTAKA-GOUNI M, SOMMER U. Assessing ecological water quality of freshwaters: PhyCoI−a new phytoplankton community Index[J]. Ecol Inform, 2016, 31: 22-29. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoinf.2015.11.004
    [31]
    曹明, 蔡庆华, 刘瑞秋, 等. 三峡水库库首初期蓄水前后理化因子的比较研究[J]. 水生生物学报, 2006, 30(1): 12-19. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-3207.2006.01.003
    [32]
    聂泽宇, 梁新强, 邢波, 等. 基于氮磷比解析太湖苕溪水体营养现状及应对策略[J]. 生态学报, 2012, 32(1): 48-55.
    [33]
    张洪, 林超, 雷沛, 等. 海河流域河流富营养化程度总体评估[J]. 环境科学学报, 2015, 35(8): 2336-2344.
    [34]
    任岩, 张飞, 王娟, 等. 新疆艾比湖流域地表水丰水期和枯水期水质分异特征及污染源解析[J]. 湖泊科学, 2017, 29(5): 1143-1157.
    [35]
    MORGAN A M, ROYER T V, DAVID M B, et al. Relationships among nutrients, chlorophyll-a, and dissolved oxygen in agricultural streams in Illinois[J]. Environ Qual, 2006, 35(4): 1110-1117. doi: 10.2134/jeq2005.0433
    [36]
    MINAUDO C, MEYBECK M, MOATAR F, et al. Eutrophication mitigation in rivers: 30 years of trends in spatial and seasonal patterns of biogeochemistry of the Loire River (1980−2012)[J]. Biogeosciences, 2015, 12(8): 2549-2563. doi: 10.5194/bg-12-2549-2015
    [37]
    CHEUNG K C, POON B T, LAN C Y, et al. Assessment of metal and nutrient concentrations in river water and sediment collected from the cities in the Pearl River Delta, South China[J]. Chemosphere, 2003, 52(9): 1431-1440. doi: 10.1016/S0045-6535(03)00479-X
    [38]
    孙林华, 付金沐. 重污染河流多源污染识别及环境背景值的确定——以宿州奎河氨氮为例[J]. 地球与环境, 2014, 42(1): 90-94.
    [39]
    张涛, 胡冠九, 范清华, 等. 太湖入湖河流总氮与氨氮相关性特征分析研究[J]. 环境科学与管理, 2015, 40(2): 21-23. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-1212.2015.02.006
    [40]
    张莺. 湖北省河流中氨氮的污染状况与特征[J]. 环境科学与技术, 2001, 24(z2): 30-31. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-6504.2001.z2.013
    [41]
    DESCY J P. Ecology of the phytoplankton of the River Moselle: effects of disturbances on community structure and diversity[J]. Hydrobiologia, 1993, 249(1/2/3): 111-116.
    [42]
    KARYDIS M, TSIRTSIS G. Ecological indices: a biometric approach for assessing eutrophication levels in the marine environment[J]. Sci Total Environ, 1996, 186(3): 209-219. doi: 10.1016/0048-9697(96)05114-5
    [43]
    DANILOV R, EKELUND N G. The efficiency of seven diversity and one similarity indices based on phytoplankton data for assessing the level of eutrophication in lakes in central Sweden[J]. Sci Total Environ, 1999, 234(1/2/3): 15-23.
    [44]
    罗梅, 刘昔, 陈国梁, 等. 城市景观河道浮游植物与水质评价[J]. 环境工程学报, 2016, 10(12): 7380-7386. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.201507237
    [45]
    张婷, 李林, 宋立荣. 熊河水库浮游植物群落结构的周年变化[J]. 生态学报, 2009, 29(6): 2971-2979. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0933.2009.06.025
    [46]
    陈红. 灞河城市段浮游生物群落特征及水质评价[D]. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学, 2018: 25-26.
    [47]
    秦娇娇, 王艳. 浮游植物多样性指数的应用及评价[J]. 沈阳师范大学学报 (自然科学版), 2014, 32(4): 502-505.
    [48]
    雷安平, 施之新, 魏印心. 武汉东湖浮游藻类物种多样性的研究[J]. 水生生物学报, 2003, 27(2): 179-184. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-3207.2003.02.015
    [49]
    李喆, 姜作发, 霍堂斌, 等. 黑龙江中游浮游植物多样性动态变化及水质评价[J]. 中国水产科学, 2012, 19(4): 671-678.
    • Related Articles

  • Related Articles

    [1]WANG Zhilong, XIA Yun, XIE Jun, SHU Rui, WANG Guangjun, YU Ermeng, LEI Xiaoting, GONG Wangbao. Comparative analysis of muscle quality, intestinal morphology and microbial composition in two cultured frogs species[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2024, 20(1): 173-183. DOI: 10.12131/20230159
    [2]ZHAO Wenyu, YU Dawei, DONG Junli, XIA Wenshi, LI Lihua. Effect of different molecular weight chitosan coating on preservation of fish fillets during refrigerated storage[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2022, 18(2): 150-157. DOI: 10.12131/20210333
    [3]TAO Feiyan, PAN Chuang, CHEN Shengjun, HU Xiao, DENG Jianchao, LI Chunsheng, RONG Hui, WANG Yueqi. Microbial analysis of Litopenaeus vannamei during partial freezing storage by Illumina high throughput sequencing[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2021, 17(2): 104-113. DOI: 10.12131/20200211
    [4]ZHANG Jiasong, DUAN Yafei, ZHANG Zhenzhen, DONG Hongbiao, LI Zhuojia. Research progress of intestinal microbial flora in shrimp[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2015, 11(6): 114-119. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-0780.2015.06.016
    [5]YOU Gang, WU Yanyan, LI Laihao, YANG Xianqing, QI Bo, CHEN Shengjun. Effect of inoculating compound lactic acid bacteria on microbial, nitrites and nitrosamines of salted fish[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2015, 11(4): 109-115. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-0780.2015.04.016
    [6]SHI Haifeng, GAO Jian, YING Jie, LIN Jianyu, XU Xinbo, LUO Hongyu. Preservation effects of water-soluble chitosan on surimi product[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2011, 7(4): 49-54. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-0780.2011.04.008
    [7]DIAO Shiqiang, LI Laihao, CEN Jianwei, WU Yanyan. Preservation effect of ozone water on anchovy (Engraulis japonius) during controlled freezing-point storage[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2011, 7(3): 8-13. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-0780.2011.03.002
    [8]WU Yunhui, LIN Lifang, QIU Chengyu. Application of sodium carboxymethylcellulose coating in preservation of razor clam[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2011, 7(2): 68-72. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-0780.2011.02.011
    [9]ZOU Li, MIAO Zhenqing, YU Cungen, CHEN Zhihai, ZHENG Ji, ZHANG Feijun, SHUI Bonian. Analysis of composition and diversity of catches by stow net[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2010, 6(6): 46-53. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-2227.2010.06.008
    [10]DIAO Shiqiang, CHEN Peiji, LI Laihao, YANG Xianqing, WU Yanyan, HAO Shuxian, CEN Jianwei. Research on the application of ozone ice in Litopeneaus vannamei preservation[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2008, 4(1): 53-57.

Catalog

    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML
    Article views (5140) PDF downloads (66) Cited by()
    Related

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co., Ltd.  

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return