RAPD标记在合浦珠母贝家系F1代的分离方式

喻达辉, 王小玉, 郭奕惠, 黄桂菊, 王爱民

喻达辉, 王小玉, 郭奕惠, 黄桂菊, 王爱民. RAPD标记在合浦珠母贝家系F1代的分离方式[J]. 南方水产科学, 2005, 1(6): 1-7.
引用本文: 喻达辉, 王小玉, 郭奕惠, 黄桂菊, 王爱民. RAPD标记在合浦珠母贝家系F1代的分离方式[J]. 南方水产科学, 2005, 1(6): 1-7.
YU Dahui, WANG Xiaoyu, GUO Yihui, HUANG Guiju, WANG Aimin. Segregation of RAPD markers in F1 generation of Pinctada fucata family[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2005, 1(6): 1-7.
Citation: YU Dahui, WANG Xiaoyu, GUO Yihui, HUANG Guiju, WANG Aimin. Segregation of RAPD markers in F1 generation of Pinctada fucata family[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2005, 1(6): 1-7.

RAPD标记在合浦珠母贝家系F1代的分离方式

基金项目: 

国家“863”高技术研究发展计划项目 2002AA603022

广东省自然科学基金项目 037148

广东省科技计划项目 2002B2150101

详细信息
    作者简介:

    喻达辉(1963-),男,副研究员,从事海洋生物技术研究。E-mail:pearlydh@pub.guangzhou.gd.cn

    通讯作者:

    王爱民,E-mail:aimwang@hotmail.com

  • 中图分类号: Q753

Segregation of RAPD markers in F1 generation of Pinctada fucata family

  • 摘要:

    对RAPD标记在合浦珠母贝F1代全同胞家系共27个样品中的分离方式进行了研究。从21条RAPD随机引物中筛选了8条引物用于扩增分析,结果共扩增出49个位点,其中正常位点47个(95.9%),异常位点2个(4.1%),即子代有扩增带而双亲无。47个正常位点中3个位点在F1中不分离(6.4%),44个位点发生分离(93.6%,即多态位点)。卡方检验表明,44个分离位点中32个符合孟德尔分离规律(72.7%),12个位点发生偏分离(27.3%)。符合孟德尔分离位点中按1:1分离位点占43.8%,3:1分离位点占56.2%,其中,父本特有标记、母本特有标记和双亲共有标记分别占28.2%,15.6%和56.2%,父本特有标记略多于母本特有标记。根据“双假测交”理论,1:1分离位点是构建F1代家系的作图位点。较高的1:1分离位点表明,利用RAPD标记构建合浦珠母贝遗传连锁图谱是可行的。

    Abstract:

    The mode of segregation of random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) markers in 27 F1 full siblings of Pinctada fucata from a single pair of parents was studied using eight 10-mer primers screened from 21. Of the total 49 loci amplified, 47 loci are normal, accounting for 95.9%, and two loci are unexpectedly amplified in F1 but not in parents. There are 44 loci segregating in the F1 individuals, accounting for 93.6%. Chi square tests indicate that the segregation of 12 loci are deviated significantly from Mendelian fashion, while the segregation of 32 loci are in line with Mendelian fashion, among which 1 : 1 segregating loci account for 43.8% and 3 : 1 segregating loci 56.2%. Among the 32 Mendelian segregation loci, paternal specific, maternal specific and biparental loci account for 28.2%, 15.6%和56.2%, respectively, indicating that the number of male specific markers is slightly larger than that of female specific markers. The high percentage of 1 : 1 segregating loci revealed in this study indicates that RAPD markers are useful in construction of linkage map of P.fucata using F1 family materials based on double pseudo-testcross configuration.

  • 致谢: 华南农业大学水产系2005届毕业生伍珊珊参加了部分实验工作,谨此致谢!
  • 图  1   OPM14引物在合浦珠母贝亲本及其F1代的扩增与分离情况

    0.DNA分子量标准(bp); 1.父本;2.母本;3~29.F1代个体

    Figure  1.   Amplification and segregation of RAPD markers in parents and F1 generation using primer OPM14

    0.DNA ladder(bp); 1.male specific marker; 2.female speific marker; 3~29.F1 progenies

    表  1   RAPD位点在F1代的分离与卡方检验

    Table  1   Segregation of RAPD loci in F1 generation and Chi square test

    编号
    no
    RAPD标记
    RAPD marker
    亲本扩增条带
    parentsal bands
    F1代期望比值
    expected ratio in F1
    F1代观测值
    observed value in F1
    卡平方值
    Chi square values
    父本
    母本
    出现:缺失
    presence:absence
    出现
    presence
    缺失
    absence
    1 OPM2-1359 + + 3:1 23 4 1.00
    2 OPM2-1092 + + 3:1 19 8 0.11
    3 OPM2-0960 + - 1:1 13 14 0.00
    4 OPM2-00836 + - 1:1 22 5 9.48*
    5 OPM2-0600 - - 异常分离/abnormal 10 17 -
    6 OPM2-0530 + + 3:1 17 10 1.49
    7 OPM14-1876 + + 3:1 18 9 0.60
    8 OPM14-1705 + + 3:1 11 16 15.12*
    9 OPM14-1272 + + 3:1 17 10 1.49
    10 OPM14-1180 + + 3:1 22 5 0.31
    11 OPM14-1030 + - 1:1 13 14 0.00
    12 OPM14-0754 - + 1:1 11 16 0.59
    13 OPM14-0668 + + 3:1 21 6 0.01
    14 OPM14-0580 + - 1:1 16 11 0.59
    15 OPM17-1753 + - 1:1 5 22 9.48*
    16 OPM17-1046 + + 3:1 6 21 37.35*
    17 OPM17-0836 + + 3:1 23 4 1.00
    18 OPM17-0726 + - 1:1 16 11 0.59
    19 OPM17-0622 + + 3:1 12 15 11.6*
    20 OPM20-1351 + - 1:1 15 14 0.00
    21 OPM20-0719 + + 子代不分离/no segregation
    22 OPM20-0585 - + 1:1 23 6 8.83*
    23 OPM20-0466 + + 子代不分离/no segregation
    24 OPM20-0423 + + 3:1 22 7 0.01
    25 S4-1542 + - 1:1 5 22 9.48*
    26 S4-1327 + + 3:1 5 22 42.98*
    27 S4-0940 + - 1:1 11 16 0.59
    28 S4-0861 + + 3:1 21 6 0.01
    29 S4-0668 + + 3:1 20 7 0.01
    30 S4-0583 - + 1:1 18 9 2.37
    31 S4-0423 - + 1:1 24 3 14.81*
    32 S10-1763 + + 3:1 12 14 10.05*
    33 S10-1583 - + 1:1 11 15 0.35
    34 S10-1225 + - 1:1 12 14 0.04
    35 S10-0828 + + 3:1 23 3 1.85
    36 S10-0689 + + 3:1 22 4 0.82
    37 S10-0308 + - 1:1 25 1 20.35*
    38 S11-1093 + + 3:1 20 7 0.01
    39 S11-0889 + - 1:1 13 14 0.00
    40 S11-0600 + - 子代不分离/no segregation
    41 S11-0485 + + 3:1 14 13 6.53*
    42 S11-0376 - + 1:1 13 14 0.00
    43 S11-0313 + + 3:1 20 7 0.01
    44 S17-1307 + + 3:1 18 9 0.6
    45 S17-1085 + + 3:1 22 5 0.31
    46 S17-0936 + - 3:1 25 2 3.57
    47 S17-0717 - + 1:1 19 8 3.70
    48 S17-0500 + + 3:1 25 2 3.57
    49 S17-0320 - - 异常分离/abnormal 11 16 -
    注:*表示显著偏离孟德尔分离比例Note: * denotes significant deviation from Mendelian segregation ratio.
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1]

    Williams J G, Kubelik A R, Livak K J, et al. DNA polymorphisms amplified by arbitrary primers are useful as genetic markers[J]. Nucleic Acids Res, 1990, 18(22): 6531-6535. doi: 10.1093/nar/18.22.6531

    [2]

    Welsh J, Michael M. Fingerprinting genomes using PCR with arbitrary primers[J]. Nucleic Acids Res, 1990, 18(24) : 7213-7218. doi: 10.1093/nar/18.24.7213

    [3]

    Klinbunga S, Ampayup P, Tassanakajon A, et al. Development of species-specific markers of the tropical oyster (Crassostrea belcheri) in Thailand[J]. Mar Biotechnol, 2000, 2(5): 476-484. doi: 10.1007/s101260000028

    [4]

    Tassanakajon A, Pongsomboon S, Jarayabhand P, et al. Genetic structure in wild populations of black tiger shrimp (Penaeus monodom) using randomly amplified polymorphic DNA analysis[J]. J Mar Biotechnol, 1998, 6(4): 249-254. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20100163

    [5]

    Yue G, Li Y, Chen F, et al. Comparison of three DNA marker systems for assessing genetic diversity in Asian arowana (Scleropages formosus)[J]. Electrophoresis, 2002, 23(7-8): 1025-1032. doi: 10.1002/1522-2683(200204)23:7/8<1025::AID-ELPS1025>3.0.CO;2-Y

    [6]

    Byrne M, Murreli J C, Allen B. An integrated genetic linkage map for eucalypts using RFLP, RAPD and isozyme markers[J]. Theor Appl Genet, 1995, 91(6-7) : 869-875. doi: 10.1007/BF00223894

    [7]

    Hashizume T, Shimamoto I, Harughima Y, et al. Construction of a linkage map for watermelon[Citrullus lanatus (Thunb)] using random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD)[J]. Euphytica, 1996, 90(3) : 265-273. doi: 10.1007/BF00027475

    [8]

    Kubisiak T L, Nelson C D, Nance W L, et al. RAPD linkage mapping in a longleaf pine×slash pine F1 family[J]. Theor Appl Genet, 1995, 90(7): 1199-1127. doi: 10.1007/BF00222931

    [9] 尹佟明, 朱立煌, 黄敏仁, 等. 利用RAPD标记构建响叶杨和银白杨分子标记连锁图谱[J]. 植物学报, 1999, 41(9) : 956-961. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1672-9072.1999.09.009
    [10]

    Hemmat M, Weeden N F, Manganaris A G, et al. Molecular marker linkage map for apple[J]. J Hered, 1994, 85(1): 4-11. doi: 10.1046/j.1420-9101.1994.7010097.x

    [11] 甘四明, 施季森, 白嘉雨, 等. RAPD标记在桉属种间杂交一代的分离方式研究[J]. 林业科学研究, 2001, 14(2) : 125-130. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-1498.2001.02.002
    [12] 刘孟军, Shin Y U, Yae B W. RAPD标记在苹果属种间杂交一代的分离方式[J]. 园艺学报, 1998, 25(3) : 214-219.
    [13] 申雪艳, 孔杰, 岳志芹, 等. RAPD标记在中国对虾Fenneropenaeus chinensis单对交配亲本及其子一代的分离方式[J]. 高技术通讯, 2004, 14 (9): 100-105. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1002-0470.2004.09.022
    [14]

    Liu Z, Li P, Argue B J, et al. Inheritance of RAPD markers in channel catfish (Ictalurus punctatus), blue catfish (I. furcatus), and their F1, F2 and backcross hybrids[J]. Anim Genet, 1998, 29(1): 58-62. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2052.1998.00284.x

    [15]

    Appleyard S A, Mather P B. Investigation into the mode of inheritance of allozyme and random amplified polymorphic DNA markers in tilapia Oreochromis mossambicus (Peters)[J]. Aquac Res, 2000, 31(4): 435-445. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2109.2000.00464.x

    [16]

    Elo K, Ivanoff S, Vuorinen J A, et al. Inheritance of RAPD markers and detection of interspecific hybridization with brown trout and Atlantic salmon[J]. Aquac, 1997, 152(1): 55-65. doi: 10.1016/S0044-8486(96)01529-3

    [17] 房经贵, 章镇, 马正强, 等. AFLP标记在两个芒果品种间杂交F1代的多态性及分离方式[J]. 中国农业科学, 2000, 33(3) : 19-24. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0578-1752.2000.03.004
    [18]

    Liu Z, Nichols A, Li P, et al. Inheritance and usefulness of AFLP markers in channel catfish (Ictalurus punctatus), blue catfish (I. furcatus), and their F1, F2, and backcross hybrids[J]. Mol Gen Genet, 1998, 258(3): 260-268. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2052.1998.00284.x

    [19]

    Li Q, Park C, Kobayashi T, et al. Inheritance of microsatellite DNA markers in the Pacific abalone Haliotis discus hannai[J]. Mar Biotechnol, 2003, 5(4): 331-338. doi: 10.1007/s10126-002-0116-8

    [20]

    Spruell P, Pilgrim K L, Greene B A, et al. Inheritance of nuclear DNA markers in gynogenetic haploid pink salmon[J]. J Hered, 1999, 90(2): 289-296.

    [21] 王爱民, 邓凤姣, 张锡元, 等. 马氏珠母贝遗传多样性的RAPD分析[J]. 武汉大学学报, 2000, 46(4) : 467-470. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1671-8836.2000.04.017
    [22] 王爱民, 阎冰, 叶力, 等. 三个野生种群马氏珠母贝遗传多样性的RAPD分析[J]. 农业生物技术学报, 2003, 11(2) : 163-168.
    [23] 苏天凤, 蔡云川, 张殿昌, 等. 合浦珠母贝3个养殖群体的RAPD分析[J]. 中国水产科学, 2002, 9(2) : 106-109. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1005-8737.2002.02.003
    [24]

    Liu Z J, Cordes J F. DNA marker technologies and their applications in aquaculture genetics[J]. Aquac, 2004, 238(1): 1-37. doi: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2004.05.027

    [25]

    Faure S, Noyer J L, Horry J P. A molecular marker-based linkage map of diploid bananas (Musa acuminata)[J]. Theor Appl Genet, 1993, 87(4) : 517-526. doi: 10.1007/BF00215098

    [26] 甘四明, 施季森, 白嘉雨, 等. 尾叶桉和细叶桉无性系的RAPD指纹图谱构建[J]. 南京林业大学学报, 1999, 23(1) : 11-14. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.1999.01.003
    [27]

    Ayliffe M A, Lawrence G J, Ellis J G, et al. Heteroduplex molecules formed between allelic sequences cause nonparental RAPD bands[J]. Nucleic Acid Res, 1994, 22(9) : 1632-1636. doi: 10.1093/nar/22.9.1632

    [28] 刘萍, 孔杰, 石拓, 等. 中国对虾黄渤海沿岸群亲本及子一代RAPD分析[J]. 海洋水产研究, 2000, 21(1) : 13-21. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7075.2000.01.003
    [29]

    Van Open M J H. Tracking dispersal rates: phylogeography of the Antarctic disjunct seaweed Acrosiphonia arcta[J]. J Phycol, 1994, 30(1): 67-80. doi: 10.1111/j.0022-3646.1994.00067.x

图(1)  /  表(1)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  5324
  • HTML全文浏览量:  156
  • PDF下载量:  3585
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2005-08-09
  • 修回日期:  2005-08-21
  • 刊出日期:  2005-12-19

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回