基于侧扫声纳方法的框架式人工鱼礁测量

Frame-type artificial reef measurement by side-scan sonar

  • 摘要: 为研究应用侧扫声纳技术评估已建人工鱼礁工程建设质量的可行性,于2017年4月应用侧扫声纳技术对已建1年的资源保护型人工鱼礁区进行现场勘测,随机选取AR1与AR2 2种人工鱼礁各15个,通过分析软件处理侧扫声纳实测数据,可获人工鱼礁的高度、沉降量、礁体布局等状态信息。结果显示,勘测礁区AR1型礁体高度为3.74~4.76 m,平均为4.44 m,沉降率为13.52%~32.20%,平均为19.20%;AR2型礁体礁体高度为2.57~3.45 m,平均为2.85 m,沉降率为13.67%~35.75%,平均为28.66%。截至调查时间为止,2种混凝土礁体结构较完整,个别礁体倾倒,实际礁体布局与预设布局有一定偏差。2种礁体沉降度单因素方差分析结果表明,2种礁体在投放海区的抗沉降能力差异显著,AR1型礁体抗沉降能力优于AR2型礁体。

     

    Abstract: To study the feasibility of assessing artificial reef construction quality by side-scan sonar, we conducted a field survey of a one-year-old stock protection artificial reef area using side-scan sonar technology in April, 2017. We selected two types of artificial reefs, AR1 and AR2, with 15 randomly selected reefs for each type. After software processing, the information of artificial reef height, settlement, structure and other data were obtained. The results show that the height of AR1 reef body was 3.74–4.76 m (average: 4.44 m), and the settlement rate was 13.52%–32.20% (average: 19.20%). The height of AR2 reef body was 2.57–3.45 m (average: 2.85 m), and the settlement rate was 13.67%–35.75% (average: 28.66%). By the time of investigation, two kinds of concrete reef structures were relatively complete, while individual reefs were dumped, and the actual reef layout had certain deviation from the preset layout. The results of single factor analysis of variance show that significant difference existed between the two types of reefs in anti-settling capacity, and AR1 had better reef-settling capacity than AR2.

     

/

返回文章
返回